1 / 67

A Long-Range Multimodal Strategy

Development of The Tennessee Statewide Travel Demand Model. G. P. L. A. N. o. D. T. T. A Long-Range Multimodal Strategy. Presented By:. Presentation Agenda. General Model Design. Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs). Review. Development of Synthetic Trip Tables.

eldon
Télécharger la présentation

A Long-Range Multimodal Strategy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Development of The Tennessee Statewide Travel Demand Model G P L A N o . D T T A Long-Range Multimodal Strategy Presented By:

  2. Presentation Agenda General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Review Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Validation Procedures & Results Model Application (2003 & 2030)

  3. General Model Design Model Characteristics • Address Major Corridor Movements • Relatively Easy to Maintain and Update • Uses Existing Data Resources • Uses Existing Software for Application • Links to Existing GIS Databases/Software • Sensitive to Shifts in Socioeconomic/Land Use Patterns • Assess Impacts of Shifts in Travel Modes • Assess Freight Movements

  4. General Model Design Potential Methodologies • Traditional Four Step TDM Procedures • Trip Generation • Trip Distribution • Mode Choice • Traffic Assignment • Trip Table Expansion (FRATAR) • Preparation of Base Trip Table(s) • Development of Expansion Factors

  5. General Model Design Steps In Model Development • Development of Highway Network & TAZs • Selection of Detail for Highway Network • Definition of TAZs • TAZ/Network Compatibility • Synthetic Matrix Estimation (SME) • Development of Seed Matrices • Matrix Estimation • Traffic Assignment

  6. Highway Network/TAZs Network/TAZ Definition • Incorporate All Roadways in TRIMS • 1,283 Miles of Interstate/Freeways • 4,300 Miles of Principal Arterials • 8,271 Miles of Other • Subset of TRIMS • Interstate and Freeways • Principal Arterials

  7. Highway Network/TAZs TRIMS/Model Comparison

  8. TAZ Boundary Highway Network/TAZs REGION 1 Network/TAZs

  9. TAZ Boundary Highway Network/TAZs REGION 2 Network/TAZs

  10. TAZ Boundary Highway Network/TAZs REGION 3 Network/TAZs

  11. TAZ Boundary Highway Network/TAZs REGION 4 Network/TAZs

  12. Highway Network/TAZs National Network

  13. Synthetic Trip Table Development Background • Trip Tables Are One of the Basic Elements of Travel Demand Models • Origin-Destination (O-D) Surveys Traditional Method for Trip Table Development • Developing Trip Tables Using Traffic Counts has been Source of Research for Past 30 Years

  14. Synthetic Trip Table Development Required Inputs • Traffic Counts • Traffic Assignment Network • Seed Trip Table

  15. Synthetic Trip Table Development Required Inputs – Traffic Counts • Sample should come from widely dispersed parts of the network • Counts on Selected Links and on Screenlines/Cutlines • Counts Need to be Directional

  16. Synthetic Trip Table Development Required Inputs – Traffic Assignment Network • Traffic Assignment Network MUST Produce Realistic Results • Equilibrium Assignment Process

  17. Synthetic Trip Table Development Required Inputs – Seed Matrix Potential Sources of Seed Matrix • Default matrix • Prior estimate based on survey measurements • Synthetically generated (e.g., from a doubly-constrained trip distribution model)

  18. Synthetic Trip Table Development Seed Matrix • Serves Two Purposes • Set the dimensions for the output matrix • Provide initial values for the estimated trip table • O-D Matrix Estimation only accounts for trips between zones (diagonal cells will be ignored – trips within a zone) • Every cell that is expected to have a positive flow must have a positive number in the base matrix

  19. Synthetic Trip Table Development Seed Matrix • Three Trip Purposes Used • Work • Other • Non-Home Based • Used Trip Rates and Lengths From National Household Survey • Urban • Rural

  20. Synthetic Trip Table Seed Matrix Seed Matrix – Trip Generation 2001 NHTS Database ● HBW – 1.70 trips/household ● HBO – 3.20 trips/household ● NHB – 2.65 trips/household ● Total – 7.55 trips/household

  21. Synthetic Trip Table Seed Matrix Seed Matrix – Trip Distribution 2001 NHTS Trip Length Distribution - HBW

  22. Synthetic Trip Table Seed Matrix Seed Matrix – Trip Distribution 2001 NHTS Trip Length Distribution - HBO

  23. Synthetic Trip Table Seed Matrix Seed Matrix – Trip Distribution 2001 NHTS Trip Length Distribution - NHB

  24. Synthetic Trip Table Seed Matrix Seed Matrix – Initial Matrix • Not Person Trips; • Merging of HBW, HBO, NHB, Internal-External and External-External Trip Tables; • Seed Matrix represents Passenger Cars and Light Commercial Vehicle Trips Only; and, • Additional Intercity (MPO to MPO) vehicle trips were added in relation to 2000 CTPP Place of Residence and Place of Work Information.

  25. Base Year (2003) Synthetic Trip Table • Traffic Counts • Traffic Assignment Network • Seed Trip Table • Application of TransCAD Matrix Estimation Program

  26. Trip Table Evaluation Good ? NO YES Base Year (2003) Trip Table Matrix Estimation Applicaiton Application of TransCAD Matrix Estimation Program Input Adjustments: Network Seed Table Counts

  27. Matrix Estimation Applicaiton

  28. Matrix Estimation Applicaiton

  29. Matrix Estimation Applicaiton

  30. Matrix Estimation Applicaiton Matrix Evaluation Parameters • Trip Length • Goodness of Fit • Screenlines

  31. Auto Model Validation Procedures VMT

  32. 18 12 94 8 88 82 70 64 Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline – Region 1

  33. Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline Results – Region 1

  34. Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline Results – Region 1

  35. Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline Results – Region 1

  36. Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline Results – Region 1

  37. Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline Results – Region 1

  38. 18 62 54 12 46 4 0 Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline – Region 2

  39. Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline Results – Region 2

  40. Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline Results – Region 2

  41. Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline Results – Region 2

  42. Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline Results – Region 2

  43. 18 48 12 24 6 40 36 0 Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline – Region 3

  44. Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline Results – Region 3

  45. Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline Results – Region 3

  46. Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline Results – Region 3

  47. Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline Results – Region 3

  48. Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline Results – Region 3

  49. Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline Results – Region 3

  50. 18 22 18 12 4 0 0 Auto Model Validation Procedures Screenline – Region 4

More Related