Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System. Student Growth Objectives. Before We Begin…. Who uses Student Growth Objectives (SGOs)? How are they used?. Proposed Weighting. Standards 1-6. Standard 7. From NJDOE N.J.A.C.6A:3-5 and 6A:10, March 6, 2013.
01 / 68Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
1 / 17
Télécharger la présentation
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation
Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement.Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien.Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.
Framework for Coherence Why Student Growth Objectives? Looking at student data Differentiation Best practices Formative assessment Lesson plans Professional Development Common planning
Framework for Coherence Formative assessment Looking at student data Differentiation Student Growth Objectives Lesson plans Best practices Professional Development Common planning
Focus on student results Explicit teaching and learning connection Improved instructional practices +Framework for coherence SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT & STUDENT SUCCESS Why Student Growth Objectives?
How Do We DetermineAreas of Focus? • What sources of data are available? • How broad/narrow will our focus be? • Example: Grade 4 math OR • Grade 4 math in the areas of number sense and computation & estimation
How Do We DetermineAreas of Focus? • What sources of data are available? • How broad/narrow will our focus be? • Example: Grade 4 math OR • Grade 4 math in the areas of number sense and computation & estimation
Specific Measureable Appropriate Rigorous, but Realistic Time-bound What Makes Objectives SMART?
SPECIFIC: Focus • Does the objective focus on one content area or specific skills in that content area? • Does the objective focus on the needs of ALL groups of learners?
MEASURABLE • Has an appropriate instrument been chosen to measure the objective? • NOTE: must match the pre-assessment measurement
APPROPRIATE Is it within the teacher’s control to affect change?
TIME-BOUND Is the objective contained to a single school year or course?
PROGRESS Students will score X% greater on the post-test than on the pre-test. ACHIEVEMENT X% of students will achieve a score of X or higher. Progress vs. Achievement
Maria’s Objective Objective Statement: In the current school year, each student will achieve an average of 1 year’s gain using the STAR Math assessment for students below, on, and above grade level as tested in August. • A good objective statement is one that is… • Specific • Measurable • Appropriate • Rigorous, but Realistic • Time-bound
Be the Evaluator: Objective Statement: In the current school year, each student will achieve an average of 1 year’s gain using the STAR Math assessment for students below, on, and above grade level as tested in August.
Anna’s Objective Objective Statement: For the 2011 – 12 school year, 100% of my students will make measurable progress in writing. Each student will improve by one performance level in composition, written expression, and mechanics/usage. Furthermore, 80% of the students will score a “3” or better overall. • A good objective statement is one that is… • Specific • Measurable • Appropriate • Rigorous, but Realistic • Time-bound
Specific: Focused on physical education, specifically the Presidential Fitness sub areas Measurable: Identified Presidential Fitness Test to be used to assess objective Appropriate: The teacher teaches the content and skills contained in the Presidential Fitness Tests. Rigorous, but Realistic: The objective of increasing student performance by 20% is realistic. It is not out of reach and yet not too easy. Time-bound: Goal attainment can be addressed by the end of the year with the final Presidential Fitness Test. Jim Nasium’s SGO During the 2011-12 school year, my sixth grade physical education students will improve performance by 20% on each of the Presidential Fitness Test sub areas.
How SMART is this objective? Anita Knapp – Second Grade Teacher During this school year, my students will improve on word knowledge and oral reading fluency.
Better SGO for Anita Knapp? Objective Statement: During this school year, 100% of my students will improve in word knowledge and oral reading as measured by PALS. Each student will move up at least a grade level in instructional reading level from fall to spring. Furthermore, students who are below grade level in instructional reading level will increase their instructional reading level by 1.5 years.
How SMART is this Objective? Mason Dixon – Government Teacher For the current school year, my students will have the knowledge and skills to be productive members of their society because they will be able to analyze primary and secondary source documents.
Better Objective for Mason Dixon? Objective Statement: During this school year, 100% of my students will improve in analyzing primary and secondary source documents. Each student will increase his/her ability to analyze documents by one level on the rating rubric. Furthermore, 75% of students will score at “proficient” or above.
How Smart is this Objective? Anne Droid – Basic Technical Drawing/Design/CAD (Teacher N) During this school year, 100% of my students will demonstrate measurable progress in the basic technical drawing by improving at least one performance level on the rubric. At least 85% of my students will score proficient on the end of the year performance assessment according to line quality, neatness, accuracy, and title block.
Anne Droid’s Data Percent of students scoring proficient or higher on a four-level rubric
Revise Maria’s SGO Original SGO Statement: In the current school year, the students will achieve an average of 1 year’s gain using the STAR Math assessment for students below, on, and above grade level as tested in August. Revised SGO Statement:
Revise Maria’s SGO Original SGO Statement: In the current school year, the students will achieve an average of 1 year’s gain using the STAR Math assessment for students below, on, and above grade level as tested in August. Revised SGO Statement: In the current school year, all students will achieve at least 1 year’s gain using the STAR math assessment; students in the below grade level category will achieve at least 1.2 year’s gain.