1 / 14

The tropical Atlantic circulation: a comparision between ORCA025, ORCA05 and FLAME 1/12°

The tropical Atlantic circulation: a comparision between ORCA025, ORCA05 and FLAME 1/12°. Drakkar-Meeting Grenoble, 25.1.-26.1.2007 Sabine Hüttl. 23°W. 5°S. 0°N. Questions to answer:.

elisa
Télécharger la présentation

The tropical Atlantic circulation: a comparision between ORCA025, ORCA05 and FLAME 1/12°

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The tropical Atlantic circulation:a comparision between ORCA025, ORCA05 and FLAME 1/12° Drakkar-Meeting Grenoble, 25.1.-26.1.2007 Sabine Hüttl

  2. 23°W 5°S 0°N Questions to answer: • 1) How realistic is the mean tropical Atlantic circulation in ORCA025 compared to observations, ORCA05 and FLAME? •  zonal section along equator • meridional section at 23°W • section along 5°S • 2) How fits the variability of the interannually forced runs into • the results from the ORCA05 • runs and similar experiments • within the FLAME framework ?

  3. 0°N Section along the equator 0.8 0.7 FLAME 1/12° ORCA05 • EUC core depths more realistic in ORCA than in FLAME (see Schott et al. 2003 and 2005, Brandt et al. 2006) •  similar velocities and strength, stronger eastward vertical inclination of EUC in ORCA ORCA025

  4. Meridional section at 23°W EUC: 13.8 Sv SEUC: 7.0 Sv observations by Brandt et al. 2006, 11 sections EUC: 12.13 Sv SEUC: 2.61 Sv NEUC: 2.43 Sv

  5. Meridional section at 23°W EUC: 12.13 Sv SEUC: 2.61 Sv NEUC: 2.43 Sv EUC: 18.44 Sv SEUC: 0.00 Sv NEUC: 0.00 Sv

  6. Meridional section at 23°W EUC: 12.13 Sv SEUC: 2.61 Sv NEUC: 2.43 Sv EUC: 19.89 Sv SEUC: 1.94 Sv NEUC: 5.71 Sv

  7. Mean annual cycle of EUC transport 23°W mean 16.91 Sv 19.89 Sv 19.89 Sv 18.44 Sv 12.13 Sv amplitude ann. cycle 8 Sv 10 Sv 10 Sv 14 Sv 8 Sv G70 KAB001 KAB002 ORCA05 FLAME 1/12° transport in Sv • ORCA05 shows too strong annual cycle • ORCA025 and FLAME in good accordance to results from OCCAM ¼° (see Hazeleger et al. 2003)  transport maximum in autumn (response to zonal wind, see Arhan et al. 2006) in all models, second maximum in spring: not in ORCA05, in G70 only weak max.  FLAME (and OCCAM ¼°) maxima occur one month earlier

  8. Interannual EUC transport variability 23°W G70 KAB001 KAB002 ORCA05 FLAME 1/12° transport in Sv interannual anomalies EUC 23°W in Sv • Most observational and model studies agree, that interannual EUC variability is • mainly wind-driven by local surface Ekman divergence. This implies: • differences between different experiments with different surface forcing/parameters: • KAB001 and KAB002 differ in amplitude (different strength of surface restoring) • KAB001/002 and G70 show different behaviour • between variability of the ORCA025-runs, ORCA05 and FLAME 1/12° even the sign is unclear !

  9. Western boundary regime 5°S NBC DWBC ORCA025 KAB001 observations by Schott et al., 2005 NBC: 26.5 Sv DWBC: 25.5 Sv NBC: 28.65 Sv DWBC: 24.01 Sv

  10. Shallow western boundary current 5°S NBC: 29.17 Sv NBC: 21.8 Sv NBC: 28.65 Sv ORCA025 KAB001 ORCA05 FLAME 1/12° • core next to western boundary is realistic only but respresented only in FLAME ! • mean northward NBC from measurements by Schott et al., 2005: 26.5 Sv • differences between ORCA025-runs? (two-core structure around 200m in KAB001 looks strange…)

  11. Shallow western boundary current at 5°S NBC: 28.65 Sv NBC: 30.61 Sv G70 KAB001/002 • both currents are too strong and show high velocities only near the surface • G70 shows stronger current core velocities (around 1.4 m/s) but core still located at the shore

  12. Annual cycle & interannual variability NBC 5°S • only KAB001 & ORCA05 show similar annual cycle (offset) • G70 and FLAME 1/12° totally different structures ! transport in Sv G70 KAB001 ORCA05 FLAME 1/12° • interannual variability of KAB001 and FLAME 1/12° shows some similarity for the last 10 years • ORCA05 and G70 do their own… NBC transport anomaly at 5°S in Sv

  13. Conclusions • 1) Mean tropical Atlantic circulation in ORCA025, ORCA05 and FLAME •  EUC structure and velocities quite realistic in all ORCA runs • western boundary current (NBC) in all ORCA runs not seperated from the coast as observed !  higher resolution ? • mean transports of EUC and NBC in most ORCA runs higher than observations, •  small-scale zonal currents only in ORCA025 and FLAME, but transports too low • 2) Annual cycle and interannual variability • EUC • phases of the annual cycle of the EUC quite robust between different ORCA025- runs and FLAME but amplitudes differ, ORCA05 not able to reproduce observed EUC annual cycle  interannual variability depends on strength of surface restoring and wind-forcing • NBC • annual cycles between KAB001, G70 and FLAME not comparable ! • interannual variability also different…

More Related