1 / 33

Monolithically Coupled Photo Diode - HBT or a Photo - HBT : A Modeled Comparison

Monolithically Coupled Photo Diode - HBT or a Photo - HBT : A Modeled Comparison. BENNY SHEINMAN, DAN RITTER MICROELECTRONIC RESEARCH CENTER ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TECHNION – ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Workshop outline. Introduction.

ellery
Télécharger la présentation

Monolithically Coupled Photo Diode - HBT or a Photo - HBT : A Modeled Comparison

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Monolithically Coupled Photo Diode - HBT or a Photo - HBT : A Modeled Comparison BENNY SHEINMAN, DAN RITTER MICROELECTRONIC RESEARCH CENTER ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TECHNION – ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

  2. Workshop outline • Introduction. • Phototransistor electrical configurations. • General bandwidth / efficiency limitations in a photo-detector. • Additional limitation in a top illuminated PIN diode / phototransistor. • Electrical modeling of the top illuminatedPIN diode / phototransistor.

  3. Phototransistor structure

  4. Photo-diode, HBT structure

  5. Photo-diode and HBT or PhotoHBT ?

  6. Phototransistor configuration Common Base Hole current flows to ground  no current gain

  7. Phototransistor configuration Common Collector High current gain Low output resistance limits performance.

  8. Phototransistor configuration Common Emitter High current gain. Bandwidth limited by Miller effect:

  9. Miller Effect Integrated PIN HBT Phototransistor

  10. Cascode Configuration Performance comparable to that of a PIN + HBT ?

  11. 650nm Collector 150nm Collector 250 250 F 200 200 t F 150 150 max F Frequency [GHz] Frequency [GHz] t 100 100 F 50 50 max 0 0 0 0 50 50 100 100 150 200 150 250 200 300 2 2 Current Density [KA/cm ] Current Density [KA/cm ] Kirk effect

  12. Kirk effect (cont.) Associated time constant for a 1*10 emitter and a 10 diameter optical window:

  13. Photodetectors bandwidth limitations • Carrier transit time: • RC of detector capacitance and amplifier input resistance: M. Agethen et al. IPRM 2002

  14. Photodetectors quantum efficiency

  15. Ideal Amplifier Only transit time limits performance

  16. Base-collector junction in a phototransistor GaInAs active layers: Base layer highly resistive -

  17. A top illuminated PIN as a notch filter

  18. Additional RC filter bandwidth limitation in a top illuminated PIN diode / phototransistor.

  19. r0 dr r R1 R2 R3 RN C1 C2 C3 CN Io1 Io2 Io3 IoN I2 I4 I3 I1 RC network in a PIN detector Physical structure Electrical equivalent circuit

  20. Spot size radius =12.5

  21. Spot size radius =12.5

  22. Spot size radius =12.5

  23. Spot size radius =12.5

  24. Spot size radius =6

  25. Spot size radius =6

  26. Top illuminated photo-transistoroption 1 Optical window Emitter Contact To base Base Metal Base Mesa

  27. Emitter Base Metal Base Mesa Top illuminated photo-transistoroption 2 Optical window Contact To base

  28. Spot size radius =12.5 2 12.5 Internal contact

  29. 48 0.2pF Model of top illuminated detector Solution of current equations is difficult: - distributed photocurrent • Photodiode capacitance / area Yet for a known capacitance value, a single pole fit gives good results

  30. High efficiency phototransistors • Cover optical window with conducting transparent ITO (Indium Tin Oxide) layer. • Place internal and external contact to the diode: • Backside illumination.

  31. Overcoming the limitations Incorporating novel structures in photo-transistors: • Wave guide photodetectors • Distributed phototransistors • Resonant-cavity-enhanced photodetector. • Uni-traveling-carrier photodiode.

  32. Conclusions • In the cascode configuration, photo-HBT have comparable performance to PIN detector + HBT processed from the same layers. • PIN detector + HBT processed from different layers will have superior performance. • The highly resistive base layer produces an internal filter in the top illuminated PIN detector. • The influence of the filter should be included in the model of the detector.

More Related