1 / 19

NFA vs DFA

NFA vs DFA. . occurs. No transition:. q. q’. . occurs. One or more transitions:. q. q’. . p. …. DFA :. For every state q in S and every character  in , one and only one transition of the following form occurs:. . q. q’.

emma
Télécharger la présentation

NFA vs DFA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NFA vs DFA  occurs • No transition: q q’  occurs • One or more transitions: q q’  p … DFA: For every state q in S and every character  in , one and only one transition of the following form occurs:  q q’ For every state q in S and every character  in   {e}, one (or both) of the following will happen: NFA:

  2. NFA vs DFA (2) : Q × (  {e}) × (Q) ’: Q’×   Q’ All deterministic automata are non deterministic Given a nondeterministic automaton, it is always possible to find a an equivalent deterministic automaton “doing the same”? That is, given an NFA M = (Q,, ,s,F) does there exists an equivalent DFA M’ = (Q’,, ’,s’,F’)? YES! We are going to construct the DFA by using the given NFA

  3. Equivalence of NFA and DFA Definition. Two automata A and A’ are equivalent if they recognize the same language. Theorem. Given any NFA A, then there exists a DFA A’ such that A’ is equivalent to A

  4. Idea of the Transformation: NFA  DFA There is a transition in the equivalent DFA:  Qi Qj We would like: For every transition in NFA:  qj q qi where Qi (or Qj) is related to qi (or qj)

  5. Idea (2): Remove Non Determinism q1 q2 . . . . . .  q q qn This is the set: DFA NFA q1  q2  q q  qn The states in the DFA will be elements in (Q) (q, )

  6. Step 1: Assign Arcs . . . . . . If in the original NFA:  pj q qi DFA: p1 q1 p2 q2  pm qn

  7. Step 1 : Variation . . . Let S be an state formed by {q1, q2, …, qn}, we denote the set (S, ) as the set of all states that are reachable from states in S by reading  DFA: q1 q2  (S, ) qn

  8. Step 2 : Eliminating e-Transitions (S, )  P’  P’’ … DFA:  P’ P’’ e e … e  (S, )

  9. Step 3: Handling Undetermined Transitions a qj qi q b  b a Suppose that  = { a, b} and we have only a transition for a: NFA: a qj qi q What should we do for b? DFA:

  10. Step 4: Determining Favorable States DFA: . . NFA: . q1 qi q2 qn We will make states favorable in the DFA only if they contain at least one state which is favorable in the NFA

  11. Examples a r r s q q > b b b a r r s q q > e b b

  12. Proof We will show the first one for a “generic” word: w = 1 2 … n Where each i is in  Given an NFA M = (Q,,,s,F) suppose that we use the procedure discussed to obtain a DFA M’ = (Q’,, ,s’,F’). What needs to be shown to prove that M and M’ are equivalent? • For each w accepted by M’, w is also accepted by the NFA • For each w accepted by M, w is also accepted by the DFA

  13. Proof (2) • Suppose that w is accepted by the DFA, what does this means? D: 1 2 n s’ s1 … sn Where s’ and each si and s’ are states in the DFA (i.e., elements in (Q); where Q are the states in the NFA) • Proof by induction on the length n of the word • w = 1 2 … n • n = 1 • n = k  n = k+1

  14. Construction . . . states in the NFA D: q1 q2  (S, ) qm Where S = {q1, q2, …, qm}, Assume no e-transitions for the moment

  15. NFA: 1 2 n s q1 … qn Select state q1 in s1 such that: 1 q1 s Select state qn-1 in sn-1 such that: n qn-1 qn Select state qn in sn such that DFA: 1 2 n We have: s s1 … sn We want: s1 = (s, 1) … sn-1 = (sn-2, n-1) sn = (sn-1, n) qn is favorable in DFA

  16. Dealing with e-transitions (S, )  P’  P’’ … D:  States in NFA P’ P’’ e e … e  (S, ) …

  17. NFA: ’1 ’2 ’m s q1 … qm n qn-1 sn e e P . … . … . . . . . . . e n-1 e qm P’ qn-2 DFA: 1 2 n We have: s’ s1 … sn We want: m  n each ’i is either anj or e

  18. Main Result The other direction is very simple (do it!): For each w accepted by N, w is also accepted by D Theorem. Given any NFA N, then there exists a DFA D such that N is equivalent to D

  19. Homework for Friday Sep. 14 • Write formally the NFA of Slide # 5 in NFA.ppt (class about nondeterministic automata) • That is, write each of the elements of: (Q,, ,s,F). • Use the procedure described in this class or the one in the book (they have some small differences) to obtain the DFA equivalent to the NFA that is on top of Slide # 12 • Also explain in words why these two automata are equivalent • Exercise 1.11 • Problem 1.31 • Problem 1.37 (so for example, C3 is the set of all binary numbers that are multiples of 3 including: 0, 11, 110, 1001, …)

More Related