1 / 25

2 nd General Assembly – NIVA HQ

The JERICO project aims to enhance the sustainability and coordination of European coastal observatories. This report from the recent General Assembly held at NIVA HQ in Oslo outlines the progress made in harmonizing existing infrastructures and sharing best practices. Through improved access to data and tools, JERICO seeks to address the complexities of coastal environments while meeting new EU directives. With contributions from various partners, the project is well-positioned to support future marine research and operational services across Europe.

erling
Télécharger la présentation

2 nd General Assembly – NIVA HQ

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2nd General Assembly – NIVA HQ MANAGEMENT REPORTING (WP11) May 5 to 7 2014 / Oslo / Norway

  2. JERICO • A • Joint • European • Research • Infrastructure network • for Coastal • Observatories

  3. JERICO (I3) Towards a long-term and sustained European network of coastal observatories Marine Core Services (DG ENT / GMES) Coastal modelling Oceanic modelling Coastal and shelf seas continuous in situ measurements GMES-MYOCEAN National/regional activities/projects Rivers discharges EURO ARGO (ESFRI) Fisheries data EUROFLEETS (I3) Social/commercial activities EMSO (ESFRI) MY OCEAN GROOM Marine data thematic centers SEADATANET (I3) standards and web portal WISE-Marine (DG ENV) EMODNET (DG MARE)

  4. MAIN OBJECTIVE • Prepare for the future European Network of operational coastal observatories through: • Better coordination • Increased harmonisation of existing infrastructures • Exchange of know-how and definition of Best Practices • Promoting coastal oceanography through TNA • Agreed deployment strategy

  5. Why JERICO ? • To address the challenge of observing the complexity and high variability of coastal areas at Pan-european level • New requirements arising from WFD and MSFD • Operational marine services (GMES) • In the last decades marine observing systems have been implemented in coastal and shelf seas around Europe • They mostly answer local/regional monitoring and oceanographic research demands • Hetereogeneity and geographical dispersion are often a limit • Often driven through short-term research projects. Sustainability is not guaranteed • One of the main challenges for the European research community is now to increase the consistency and the sustainability of these infrastructures by addressing their future within a shared pan-European framework. www.jerico-fp7.eu

  6. A VISION ? The JERICO vision is to make a significant contribution to the harmonisation of existing European coastal observatories and to support future strategic developments. JERICO will promote easier access to the infrastructures and data. JERICO will: - increase knowledge and understanding of marine systems, strengthen the evidence base for environmental assessments, - provide data and information required to improve predictions of future human and climate-driven environmental change and the strategies to combat them. - support developments of new tools and technologies for the monitoring of key oceanographic parameters in coastal systems. www.jerico-fp7.eu

  7. How the project is structured ?

  8. Work Packages links www.jerico-fp7.eu

  9. NIVA IMR SYKE SMHI DMI MI NERC CEFAS BL P A R T N E R S DELTARES NIOZ IBWPAN MUMM HZG CNRS/INSU IFREMER OGS INGV CNR CMCC IH AZTI CSIC PdE IO-BAS UOM HCMR

  10. GENERAL ASSEMBLY • INFORMATION • COMMUNICATION, JERICO website • MANAGEMENT, COORDINATION (WP11) • TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL REPORTS • FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT • WP ACTIVITIES (coordination, tasks, workshops, deliverables, milestones, ...) • APPROVALS & CONCLUSIONS

  11. INFORMATION • October 2012: 1st general assembly - CRETE • October 2012: FCT & 1st calibration experiment – BREST (F) • April 2013: Ferrybox meeting – HELSINKY (FI) • May 2013: Steering committee n°3 – GALWAY (IR) • June 2013: Mid Term Review – PARIS (F) • October 2013: Workshop WP10 – VILLEFRANCHE (F) • Start of the 2nd calibration experiment • November 2013: WP2 meeting with EUROGOOS • February 2014: Strategy meeting – Brussels • March 2014: FCT at OI – LONDON (UK)

  12. INFORMATION • TNA calls • 2nd Call in 2012 (January to March) • 3rd Call in 2012 (September toNovember) • TNA selection panel • Dr. Janet Newton, biological oceanographer, P.I. at the  University of Washington and the Executive Director for the Northwest Association of Networked Ocean Observing Systems (NANOOS) • Dr George Zodiatis, Physical Oceanographer, University of Cyprus. • Dr. Richard Dewey, Physical Oceanographer, University of Victoria, Canada. • Dr Hans Dalhin, Director of EUROGOOS • Dr Roger Proctor, Program Leader, IMOS, University of Tasmania, Australia • Dr Franciscus Colijn, University of Kiel • Dr Laurent Mortier, GROOM coordinator, UPMC/LOCEAN laboratory • Dr Alicia Lavin IEO, Spain

  13. INFORMATION • MID TERM REVIEW – 18/19 June 2014 ( Paris) • The project has proven to be useful for a large community and has excellent long term perspectives if the effort can be sustained. • The project is on track; delays exist of course but do not put the project at danger if no further delays will be encountered • Good progress (the project has achieved most of its objectives and technical goals for the period with relatively minor deviations) • Overall recommendations : • Interactions between WP need to be strengthen and shown in the next reporting periods (in particular when preparing the common strategy and label definition and OSSE exercises).

  14. INFORMATION • NEXT OFFICIAL MEETINGS • Steering committee n°4: Oslo, May 2014 • Final NA workshop (WP3 & 4): TBD, end of 2014 • Steering committee n°5: TDB, Jan/Feb 2015 • Stakeholder meeting: TDB, 2015 • Final GA: France, April 2015  All

  15. COMMUNICATION

  16. COMMUNICATION - JERICO WEBSITE • www.jerico-fp7.eu • A practical link with the partners: • General information: next events (FCT), project news • Access to deliverable • Information on TNA and Data • Data tool provided by WP6 • OCEANBOARD • OCEANBOARD : a well adapt tool to touch the professional or non professional public. • JERICOPROF and JERICOPUB

  17. WP11-Coordination & Management P. Farcy, Ifremer, with N. Beaume & I. Puillat Jerico@ifremer.fr

  18. WP 11 - Management • Task 1: day to day management • Task 2: financial follow-up • Task 3: Technical reporting, M18, 36, 48 • Task 4: Quality assurance plan (with HCMR) • Identity set (with NIVA) • Task 5: Consortium animation • Task 6: Other management related issues • Exchanges with Australia and USA • Associated partners

  19. WP11 - MANAGEMENT • Quality assurance plan V4 – available (ask me). • Identity set : the description is on the website. To have the # items (ppt, logo, etc…) please ask to Ingrid or me. • Grant Agreement amendment 1 officially sent to the commission •  waiting for the signature by UE

  20. WP11 - MANAGEMENT • CNRS: Article 10 for 2 CNRS/University labs (Bordeaux & Perpignan) • Unit cost for glider infrastructure • NERC: SA/TNA infrastructures unavailable • CNR: Some TNA Unit costs to modify • HCMR: Some TNA Unit costs to modify • IBWPAN: CRS infrastructure unavailable • NIVA: One ferrybox unavailable • Sub contracting of NIVA for WP1 (D. Durand) • CSIC: Increase the Unit of Access (90 118)

  21. DELIVERABLES 1st PERIOD

  22. DELIVERABLES 2nd PERIOD

  23. DELIVERABLES 2nd PERIOD

  24. MILESTONES 2nd PERIOD

  25. www.jerico-fp7.eu

More Related