1 / 20

Application of High-Speed Turbocompressors at Municipal WWTPs in Michigan

Application of High-Speed Turbocompressors at Municipal WWTPs in Michigan. Jim Flamming, P.E. , Senior Process Engineer, Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber, Inc. Aeration Blowers. Aeration consumes 40-70% of energy used in activated sludge plants (WEF MOP OM-9)

ethan-ballard
Télécharger la présentation

Application of High-Speed Turbocompressors at Municipal WWTPs in Michigan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Application of High-Speed Turbocompressors at Municipal WWTPs in Michigan Jim Flamming, P.E. , Senior Process Engineer, Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber, Inc.

  2. Aeration Blowers • Aeration consumes 40-70% of energy used in activated sludge plants (WEF MOP OM-9) • For supplying diffused aeration grids, 2 types: • Positive Displacement • Approx. 60% efficient • Typically smaller (<100 hp) • Output varies with speed,not pressure • Factory or OEM packages available • Widely applied, low capital costs

  3. Aeration Blowers • Multistage Centrifugal: • Approx. 65-75% efficient • Wide range of sizes, typ. >50 hp • Output varies with pressure • Widely applied for over 100 yrs. • Can be more expensive initially than positive displacement • PD and multistage blowers are the workhorses of the industry.

  4. But Times Are Changing! • With renewed emphasis on energy efficiency, new styles of blowers are starting to be applied. • High speed turbocompressorsoffer several potential advantages over traditional blowers: • Higher efficiencies • Lower maintenance costs • Variable output • Quiet operation

  5. High Speed Turbocompressors • Operate at very high speeds:25,000 to 45,000 rpm • No contact bearing surface: magnetic or airfoil bearings • No contact = no friction = no wear parts • Oil free operation; no lubrication requiredor bearings to service • Very low maintenance

  6. High Speed Turbocompressors • 10-20% improvement in efficiency • Operate on VFDs; maintaining best efficiency at turndowns of up to 50% of max output • No contact – very low vibrations – low noise (<70 dB at operating speed) • Factory supplied package units with controls • Typically small footprints

  7. High Speed Turbocompressors • Different styles from different manufacturers • Magnetic Bearings – ABS/HST, Hoffman Revolution, Atlas Copco ZB-VSD; Spencer AyrJet • Air Foil Bearings – HIS HT; K-Turbo; APG-Neuros; Turblex • Magnetic bearings prevent any contact during operation, but typically cost more upfront • Most are direct drive units; Turblex also providesa separately geared unit with additional control capability

  8. ABS/HST • Of the direct drive units, so far ABS/HST has the most installations in the U.S. at municipal WWTPs (61 units at 21 WWTPs, and 1300 units worldwide) • Built in Sweden • Only one with direct drive installations so far in Michigan, at three sites, which we will review as case studies

  9. ABS/HST • Five models • 93-536 HP • 600-10,400 scfm • 5.5 – 18.2 psig discharge pressure

  10. ABS/HST

  11. Case StudiesMichigan WWTPs

  12. Marquette WWTP • Replaced RBCs with three plug flow 500,000-gallon nitr. basins; plus one 500,000-gallon WAS tank • 1 50-hp and 1 75-hp blower to three 200-hp turbocompressors (ABS HST SP6000-1-L-5) each 4,337 scfm at 8 psig • Start up July 2008

  13. Coldwater WWTP • Trickling filter-solids contact plant • NH3 violations, May 2007 • Installed new IFAS, which required added aeration (presented in Session 1) • Existing plant had two75-hp, 900-scfm blowers

  14. Coldwater WWTP • Installed two 93-hp ABS/HST S2500-2-A-5; each 1,257 scfm at 8 psig • Placed in new building; existing blowers remain as backup units • City doesn’t have historical flow and hp draw data for blowers; difficult to compare

  15. Reed City WWTP • Three basin SBR plant • Industrial/municipal WW • Utilized three 150-hp PD blowers which had HIGH rates of failure • Replaced units with four111-hp HST S2500-1-H-5;each 1,969-scfm at 8 psig innew blower building

  16. Reed City WWTP

  17. Reed City WWTP • After installation, plant measured output: • Old blowers rated for 3,000 scfm withtwo blowers running • New HSTs – 3,600 scfm at 80 hp • DO’s higher in SBRs • Low noise • Virtually no vibration • Still in start-up; addressing electrical issues at site

  18. Some Things To Consider… • HSTs may not be suitable for every plant • Relatively high initial capital costs; need to do a life cycle cost analysis; magnetic vs. air-foil • Not cost-effective at lower HP requirements • Would not want to parallel with PD blowers • Sophisticated electronics, need to review existing electrical service and power quality • Faults happen during start-up

  19. Conclusions • The world of wastewater treatment is changing • New PLC-based controls open up the possibility for new kinds of technologies • Offer better efficiencies and less maintenance • While not for every application, HSTs offer some intriguing advantages that are worth consideration .

  20. Thank you Any Questions?

More Related