1 / 10

MIT’s Emergency Response System Evolution and Development

This document outlines the evolution and development of the Emergency Response System at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, led by Director William Van Schalkwyk. It highlights key drivers behind a robust emergency response framework, such as historical incidents, regulatory compliance, business continuity, and community expectations. The timeline details crucial developments from the 1970s to the post-9/11 era, illustrating how MIT has adapted to various types of emergencies including fires, spills, crimes, and natural disasters. Key stakeholders and responders are also identified.

eugenia-garrett
Télécharger la présentation

MIT’s Emergency Response System Evolution and Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MIT’s Emergency Response System Evolution and Development William Van Schalkwyk Director of Environmental, Health and Safety Programs Massachusetts Institute of Technology October 30, 2003

  2. Drivers for a Strong Emergency Response System • History of incidents on campus • Regulatory compliance • Business continuity • Community expectations • Reputational benefit

  3. Evolution of MIT’s Emergency Response System • 1970: Formal response system developed • Student fatality in dorm fire • 1975: Informal emergency response group formed within Department of Facilities • 1990: Incident Management System established • State Police helicopter crashes across from Walker • MIT confined space rescue team (Dept. of Facilities) are first responders

  4. Continued Evolution of MIT’s Emergency Response System • 1995: Formal training of first emergency response group • Dept. of Facilities • Safety Program • Environmental Medical Services • 1999: Y2K campus wide committee • 2001: Post- 9/11 review • National and regional threats • Island Status in a major emergency

  5. 5 Types of Emergencies • Fire • Spills and release • Crimes • Serious injury and/or death • MIT community member • On-campus injury or death • Natural disasters and utility emergencies

  6. 3 Levels of Classification • Level 1: Localized fire/incident - No Alarm • Trash can fire immediately extinguished • Occur daily • Level 2: Fire/incident - Alarm Triggered • Ranges from soldering that sets off smoke alarm to lab fire with chemical contamination • 4 to 12 significant incidents annually • First responders often among those injured • Level 3: Incident beyond single campus building; local or regional disaster • None since 9/11

  7. Threats Unique to MIT • Broad range of hazardous materials and nuclear reactor • Highly visible target • Protestors • Boston/Cambridge location

  8. Potential Responders, Investigators and Onlookers at an MIT Emergency

  9. MIT Campus Partners in Emergency

  10. Number of Responding Agencies by Classification Level

More Related