1 / 30

Short-Term Recovery of Limb Muscle Strength After Acute Stroke

Short-Term Recovery of Limb Muscle Strength After Acute Stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 125-30 Andrews AW, Bohannon RW Department of Physical Therapy Education, Elon University, Elon. Background. Strength after stroke correlates with functional activities

evers
Télécharger la présentation

Short-Term Recovery of Limb Muscle Strength After Acute Stroke

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Short-Term Recovery of Limb Muscle Strength After Acute Stroke Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 125-30 Andrews AW, Bohannon RW Department of Physical Therapy Education, Elon University, Elon

  2. Background • Strength after stroke • correlates with functional activities • e.g. transfer, gait, stair climbing • Predict the future outcome • e.g. status of motor function, functional status at discharge, length of stay, discharge destination, mortality

  3. Background • Previous studies used MMT to measure strength • Strength scores use ordinal scale that is not norm referenced • Force transducer provide force measurement in real numbers

  4. Background • Previous researchers have used instruments to measure post-stroke recovery of muscle strength, but only single joint or action • e.g. grip strength, knee flexion and extension • Changes of strength noted in none affected side were not compared with normative reference values

  5. Background • Comorbid diseases occur more frequently among stroke survivors than matched controls • Relation of comorbidities with functional outcomes and mortality have been addressed • no studies about the influence of comorbidities on the recovery of strength

  6. Purposes • Norm-referenced • Objective measurements • Muscle strength impairment at admission and discharge • Relation between comorbidities and the recovery of strength

  7. Norm reference • Normative Values for Isometric Muscle Force Measurements Obtained With Hand-held Dynamometers • Physical Therapy 1996; 76:248-59 • A Williams Andrews, Micheal W Thomas, Richard W Bohannon

  8. Tested by dynamometer • 156 subjects, ages of 50-79 years • Tested action: • Shoulder flexion, abduction, medial and lateral rotation • Elbow flexion and extension • Wrist extension • Hip flexion and abduction • Knee flexion and extension • Ankle dorsiflexion

  9. Result: gender, age, and weight were identified as independent predictors of force for all muscle actions • Y= a - b*(S) + b*(W) – c* (A) • Multiple correlations associated with the regression equations: 0.624-0.869

  10. Subjects • 50 inpatients in rehabilitation unit at the University of North Carolina Hospitals between 1994-1997 • Rehabilitation emphasizing early movement, exercise with resistance, balance training in sitting and standing, daily functional activities • 3 hours of PT, OT and recreational therapy on weekday and at least 1 hour on weekend day

  11. Subjects • Diagnosis of acute stroke • Sudden loss of neurological function, caused by vascular injury to the brain • More than 90% of patients had neuroimaging evidence of acute stroke

  12. Exclusion criteria • Unable to follow directions • e.g global aphasia • Strength testing was contraindicated • e.g. Recent cardiac surgery

  13. Subject characteristics

  14. comorbidies • Only comorbidies known to affect strength or mobility were recorded, e.g. arthritis, hip fracture, peripheral arterial disease, traumatic injury, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcohol abuse, joint replacement, congestive heart failure, diabetes

  15. Methods • Retrospective analysis • convenience sample • single-blinded • One examiner • Tested on admission and discharge • Same testing device (Hand-held dynamometer) and protocol

  16. Tested actions • Shoulder abduction • Elbow flexion • Elbow extension • Wrist extension • Hip flexion • Knee extension • Ankle dorsiflexion

  17. Test position • Gravity neutral position • Dynamometer was placed perpendicular to the body segment • As distal as possible • Peak forces abtained

  18. Statistical analysis • Systat, version 10.0 • Mixed model (2×2×7×2×3) ANOVA • t-test

  19. Results

  20. Results

  21. Results

  22. Discussion • 7/7increase in strength on the weaker side • 4/7 increase in strength on the stronger side • Greater mean percentage increase on the weaker side • Greater potential for progress in weaker side • Thrust of rehabilitation intervention • Therapist emphasized strength gaze in weaker side • Natural neurological recovery

  23. All 3 muscle of strong L/E showed a significant increase in muscle strength • Early standing and gait activities • Support most of their weight in standing through the stronger L/E

  24. All muscle actions on BOTH sides were weaker than predicted • 10% or less of the corticospinal axons remain ipsilateral • Inactive for most of the day– disuse atrophy • Lack of exercise and nutritional support • Subjects with stroke may have led sedentary lifestyle

  25. Presence of comorbidities and previous stroke did not adversely affect subject’s strength • acute cerebral lesion is the primary factor responsible for determining the degree of strength impairment • Short term recovery • May be found in larger sample of subjects

  26. Limitation • Larger sample maybe needed • Longer period of F/U • DC on 29.4±15.4 days poststroke  may not be applicable in subjects who are more than 1 month poststroke

  27. Limitation • Comorbidity index • Single unblinded examiner • Examiner also provide rehabilitation interventions to the subjects

  28. conclusion • Muscle strength increased inBOTH sides • Early movement, exercise with resistance and function was insufficient to increase strength of BOTH sides to levels equal to pred. values  need for strengthening ex. • Comorbidities and previous stroke did not affected recovery of strength in early time post stroke. Extent of cerebral lesion maybe a much greater influence

  29. Criticism • Strength: • Objective, measurement in real number • Multiple joint test (including U/Es and L/Es) • Weakness: • Statistics model is too complicated (2×2×7×2×3 ANOVA) • Insufficient data was shown • Insufficient explanation for the statistics result • Insufficient explanation for the modification of testing position • Unknown neurological status of the subjects

  30. Thank you for your attention

More Related