70 likes | 193 Vues
This document outlines the draft performance requirements for stave core systems presented at the Liverpool WP4 meeting on July 11, 2013. It defines crucial elements such as geometrical, thermo-mechanical, and electrical performance specifications necessary for module integration. Key requirements include ensuring modules remain cool, facilitating proper insertion, and providing the necessary voltages and signals. The presentation emphasizes the importance of properties consistency among staves, aiming for an optimized design to reduce complexity in module mounting. Feedback from attendees is encouraged to refine the draft further.
E N D
Stave Core Thermo-mechanical and Electrical Performance Requirements (Tim) Liverpool WP4 Meeting (11/7/13)
Why & What ? • Why? • It’s a WP4 deliverable • M4.1 (2013/Q3) • Draft stave thermo-mechanical and electrical performance requirements documented • It might be useful! • What? • What do we mean by ‘stave’ • Stave core / Stave core + EOS / Stave core + EOS +modules ? • What do we mean by ‘performance requirements’? • Geometrical • Thermo-mechanical • Electrical • Don’t worry – It’s only a DRAFT! Liverpool WP4 Meeting (11/7/13)
Format? (Stolen from Ian) • Scope • Brief description ? • Assumptions • Co-cured face sheets, titanium tube, Allcomp foam, honeycomb core, Hysol 9396 • Essential Requirements • Keeps modules cool, allows insertion and puts modules roughly in the right place and keeps them there • Capable of supplying correct voltages & signals to/from modules as viewed through EOS connector(s) • Desirable Requirements • Staves should have similar properties & performance characteristics (module noise, cooling performance, stiffness, geometry) • Stave properties should not make module mounting and insertion harder than it needs to be. • Target Parameters • Mass < g • %X0 < % • Noise < e • Cost < £ Liverpool WP4 Meeting (11/7/13)
Examples …. • Mechanical • Geometric tolerances Liverpool WP4 Meeting (11/7/13)
Examples #2 • Thermal Liverpool WP4 Meeting (11/7/13)
Examples #3 • Electrical Liverpool WP4 Meeting (11/7/13)
How do we (I?) Proceed? • Draft of a draft? • Please comment (by e-mail) and I’ll collate • Produce draft • Timescale ~ 2 weeks? • Scope as shown on page 3 • Discussion in UK first • E-mail out to Lynn, Haber et al.. • Should aim for final draft version (!) by end September 2013 Liverpool WP4 Meeting (11/7/13)