Download
size effect on thermal conductivity of thin films n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Size effect on thermal conductivity of thin films PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Size effect on thermal conductivity of thin films

Size effect on thermal conductivity of thin films

181 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

Size effect on thermal conductivity of thin films

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Size effect on thermal conductivity of thin films Guihua Tang, Yue Zhao, Guangxin Zhai, Zengyao Li, Wenquan Tao School of Energy & Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China

  2. 1 Background 2 Local mean free path method 3.1 3 3.2 4 4 Outline Results 1: Local thermal conductivity distribution Results 2:Overall thermal conductivity Conclusions

  3. 1. Background • Boundary or interface scattering becomes important when the characteristic length (film thickness, wire diameter) is comparable with the mean free path. • The thermal conductivity (as well as other transport coefficients, viscosity) becomes size dependent. • Numerous important applications of nanoscale thermal conduction (electronic devices cooling, thermal insulator, thermalelectric conversion, etc.)

  4. Z y The Phonon Gas X is the lattice volumetric specific heat; is the average speed of phonons; is the phonon mean free path. • Specific heat of solid: Lattice vibration in solids. Harmonic oscillator model of an atom • Conduction in insulatorsis dominated by lattice waves or phonons. • Simple expression of thermal conductivity based on the kinetic theory

  5. is bulk mean free path Apply the Matthiessen’s rule • Classical size effect based ongeometric consideration (1) • In the ballistic transport limit, L<<Lb, the MFP is L • L>>Lb, the MFP is the bulk mean free path Lb • Intermediate region:

  6. L A thin film for paths originated from the boundary surface (m≈3) Simple interpolation between the two expressions • Classical size effect based ongeometric consideration (2) • When L<<Lb, assuming that all the energy carriers originate from the boundary surface • L>>Lb, the MFP is the bulk mean free path Lb

  7. L (m≈3) A thin film for paths originated from the centre Interpolation • Classical size effect based ongeometric consideration (3) • The direction of transport was not considered and the anisotropic feature cannot be captured • Filk and Tien employed a weighted average of the mean free path components in the parallel and normal directions of a thin film

  8. L Interpolation (m≈4/3) • Classical size effect based ongeometric consideration (4) A thin circular wire for paths originated from the centre

  9. Thin Film Thin Wire p is the probability of specular scattering on the boundary • Classical size effect based onBoltzmann Transport Equation (BTE) • The relaxation time approximation was adopted. • The distribution function was assumed to be not too far away from equilibrium.

  10. For a thin film: 2. Local mean free path method • For an unbounded phonon gas, the probability of a phonon gas can travel between two consecutive collisions with other phonons at location x and x+dx would be of the form: The probability of a phonon gas having a free path between x and x+dx • When the gas is bounded, a number of phonons will be terminated by the boundary, thus effective MFP < Lb

  11. Semi-infinite film:

  12. Thin film:

  13. 3. Results Local thermal conductivity distribution in a semi-infinitefilm

  14. L Local thermal conductivity distribution in a thin film

  15. Overall thermal conductivity in a thin film VS Kn

  16. 4. Conclusions • An equation to calculate the size-dependent film thermal conductivity has been derived. No Matthiessen’s rule; No interpolation • Local thermal conductivity distribution in the thin film has been obtained. • The present solution seems to overpredicts reduction in thermal conductivity compared to the data in references when Knudsen number is larger than 1. • More cases are needed for further validation and extension to complicated geometric structures.

  17. Thanks for your attention! 09/07/2010