Results of 3D View Synthesis Experiments Using Semi-Automatic Depth Exploration Methods
180 likes | 320 Vues
This paper details the experiments conducted on 3D view synthesis utilizing semi-automatic depth estimation methods. The results indicate that semi-automatic DERS methods outperform automatic ones, though further key frames are needed for enhanced quality. Depth maps were assessed across three frames, demonstrating that half-pixel precision yields improved performance over pixel and quarter-pixel methods. Quality evaluation indicates that the synthesized view’s quality is more dependent on the image compression quality than on depth map accuracy. The findings highlight the significance of quantization parameters on the synthesized view's PSNR.
Results of 3D View Synthesis Experiments Using Semi-Automatic Depth Exploration Methods
E N D
Presentation Transcript
M17051 - Newspaper sequence - Results of 3DV/FTV Exploration Experiments with depths and view synthesis. Krzysztof KlimaszewskiOlgierd StankiewiczKrzysztof Wegnerteam supervisor: Marek Domański Chair of Multimedia Telecommunications and MicroelectronicsPoznań University of Technology, Poland October, 2009, Xi’an
EE1 • ‘Newspaper’ sequence • Recommended settings • Semiautomatic DERS5.0 + VSRS3.5 • Half-pixel • new manual information for key frames • Smoothing coefficient 1.0-4.0
Background – wrong depth M16756 - Results of Exploration Experiments
new MDM file Frame 100 Frame 200
new MEM file Frame 100 Frame 200
Best results • Half-pixel precisionis 0.3dB betterthan pixel precisionwhich is 0.2dB betterthan quarter-pixel-precision • Results aresubjectively better
Depth map obtained for frame 0, 100, 200
Conclussions • Semi-automatic DERS is better than automatic DERS • Still more key frames is needed to achieve better quality
EE 4 • JMVM 5.0.6 • GOP length was set to 16 • Targeted bitrates 0.75, 1.5, 3, 6 Mbps for 2 view case • QP – Quantization index for views • QD – Quantization index for depth maps M16756 - Results of Exploration Experiments
Quantization parameters • Selected QP and QD indexespairswhichmeettargetedbitrate
Summary • Quality of synthesized view depends more on quality of compressed/decompressed image (QP parameter) than on quality of compressed/decompressed depth (QD). • The usual approach of choosing the minimal QP does not give the best results in some cases, but the differences of quality measures are neglible. • When quality of synthesized view is calculated with original view as a reference, no quality improvement is observed when increasing bitrate from 3 Mbps to 6Mbps in terms of PSNR, PSNR (pspnr) and PSPNR. • Quality of synthesized views (PSNR as well as PSPNR) increases, when measured with reference synthesized from uncompressed data in the similar way as for 2D sequences – approximately constant increase of quality for increase of bitrate by a factor of two.