1 / 7

RFID Tag Antennas as Scatterers Preliminary Report

RFID Tag Antennas as Scatterers Preliminary Report. Daniel M. Dobkin March 2005. Experimental Configuration. MPR6000 + nominal 8 dBi vertically polarized panel antenna; 27 dBm nominal output power, 0 nominal delay (about 10% duty cycle), class 1 only

fathia
Télécharger la présentation

RFID Tag Antennas as Scatterers Preliminary Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RFID Tag Antennas as ScatterersPreliminary Report Daniel M. Dobkin March 2005

  2. Experimental Configuration • MPR6000 + nominal 8 dBi vertically polarized panel antenna; 27 dBm nominal output power, 0 nominal delay (about 10% duty cycle), class 1 only • Alien ‘I’ tags on foam board (configuration varied) • Agilent 4417 A power meter in peak-reading mode • Each data point = 20-30 seconds to capture best peak

  3. First set: 9 tags on board • Board configuration: • Result: • That is: • Horizontally oriented tags have little effect on vertically-polarized impinging radiation • Vertically polarized tags reduce received signal by about 8 dB at 10-15 cm distance

  4. Second set: 18 tags on board • Board configuration: • Result: • That is: • Adding more tags leads to slightly increased received signal • Note we are sitting in the ‘bright spot’ centered behind the obstacle…

  5. Lateral slice • Check signal distribution behind obstacle: • Slightly higher attenuation but no sign of a ‘bright spot’ around the center • Remember we’re hopping and selecting for best signal; optimal scattering configuration accidentally encountered in each case?

  6. In-plane obstacle • Reorient TX and RX antennas for horizontal polarization • Interpose board with 6 rows of tags laid out horizontally, varying relative height

  7. In-plane obstacle: results • Strong attenuation in plane of tags • as much as 22 dB • Attenuation extends out of plane of tags • Receiver remains in shadow even when obstructing tags are 15 cm above it • Apparent shadow edge is sharp! 18 dB in 5 cm • Sloppy experimental procedure: why is unobstructed signal 13 dB higher than before? • I didn’t record any change in distance • Horizontal polarization – floor bounce? If so, must be folded into results…repeat with vertical polarization?

More Related