1 / 25

Argumentation

Argumentation. Identifying Arguments. What Cannot be argued Discrete Facts without interpretation- Obama won the 2008 election Impossibilities (who would win the bear or the lion) Preferences (Mr. Pibb is better than Dr. Pepper) Beliefs beyond Human experience (invoking God)- .

forest
Télécharger la présentation

Argumentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Argumentation

  2. Identifying Arguments • What Cannot be argued • Discrete Facts without interpretation- Obama won the 2008 election • Impossibilities (who would win the bear or the lion) • Preferences (Mr. Pibb is better than Dr. Pepper) • Beliefs beyond Human experience (invoking God)-

  3. Analyzing Arguments and Evidence • Components of a valid argument • Examine the Accuracy • Supporting reasons are true and accurate • The Structure of the argument is valid • Valid arguments have: • An Argument (what the proponent/opponent wants) • A well justified reason (why they want it) • Accurate and logical • A Policy conclusion • The policy based on this conclusion

  4. How to Analyze the Argument • Is the argument empirical? • Does the argument present any supporting data? • What is the source of the data? Is it trustworthy?

  5. Interest Groups as Actors What is Important What is not Grassroots (unless astroturf) Unconventional tactics Everything that is not on the left hand side. • Money • Size • Cohesiveness

  6. How to determine power? • At the Federal Level • www.opensecrets.org • At the State Level • http://www.followthemoney.org/

  7. When Looking at Politicians Who Matters Who Does Not Old elected officials (George W. Bush) Candidates and partieswho do not have a chance Lower-level bureaucrats • Must be elected, or well known candidates • The more senior the better • The more members of their party in the legislature, the better

  8. Decision makers are more important than non-decision makers

  9. An example of an Argument • Argument: We need to insure the 30+ Million Americans do not have health care • Reason: Persons without health care drive up the cost of insurance for all Americans • Conclusion: We should implement a single-payer plan proposed by Congress What is missing from this argument?

  10. What Qualifies as evidence • Research studies and Surveys • Method • Phone, in person, mail • Sample size • Larger is better if collected properly • Sponsor • Many research studies are very dated

  11. What qualifies as Evidence • Case Studies • An application of the policy solution to a smaller group • State level • Municipal. • Be Careful • May not be generalizable • Apples to oranges • Remember that the United States is unique

  12. What Qualifies as Evidence • Expert Testimony • http://www.kvue.com/news/politics/Professor-Hutchison-campaign-on-death-watch-after-poll-83486467.html • Can be misleading • Personal experience is the weakest form of evidence • Precedents • Previous attempts at policy • Examine the similarities and dissimilarities • E.g. 1994 vs. 2010 Health Care Bill

  13. Fallacies

  14. Fallacies • A way of making a persuasive argument, via a mistake in reasoning • Faulty Logic

  15. Ecological Fallacy • Using Aggregate Data to infer individual opinions. (taking means or grouped data and using it to explain the actions of individuals) • Also called the fallacy of division- if the whole possesses a quality, but the parts might not • On Grandpa Simpson wanting to help: "Call this an unfair generalization if you must, but old people are no good at everything." Moe the Bartender from the Simpsons

  16. Exception Fallacy • Taking individual behavior and applying to a group. • Stereotyping • Applying the preferences of one actor to a class of political actors • Using one extreme “story” to justify macro-level policy

  17. Hasty Generalization • Using a small or non-representative sample to prove a point. (a type of exception fallacy) • I know a guy who didn’t vote for McCain, because of Palin, so she must have cost him the election • Everyone I know voted for Rick Perry in Iowa, how did he lose?

  18. Faulty Generalization • An example of the exception fallacy • Evaluating all with criteria that apply only to some • Be wary of saying that “Democrats”, “Republicans”, Liberals, Conservatives, believe something. Attach names with parties.

  19. AD HOMINEN ("to the man“) • Discredit a person's qualities or circumstances • Don’t trust Dick Cheney, everyone knows he’s evil. • Any Examples?

  20. APPEAL TO AUTHORITY • Expert Authorities can be useful for argumentation (e.g. Federal Data). • Fallacious if the authority is not really an expert or when there are trust issues • Because Sean Penn likes Hugo Chavez, he has to be a good guy after all. • Television Ad’s do this all the time with endorsements

  21. EMOTIONAL APPEAL • Appeals to fear and pity with little relevance to the issue • Often Involve threats, pity, appeals to fear, evoke sympathy. • Cutesy stories • Here is a example

  22. SLIPPERY SLOPE • One undesirable effect will automatically lead to another and another • We elect Obama and we will all be socialists, and then communists

  23. Argument from Ignorance • In Logic, all hypotheses are false until proven true. • In this case, you assume something is true until proven false. • Kennedy assassination was an inside job • 9/11 was an inside job- prove me wrong.

  24. For Submission 2 • Present arguments that make sense • Present arguments from actors that are politically relevant • Present arguments that are directly related to the issues.

  25. For Submission 2 • Keep writing 1 page a day or finding 1 good source a day • Spend at least 1 hour a day in a place where you are most comfortable for studying • Don’t

More Related