1 / 13

Finding Order in ESP Events?

C.M.S. Cohen R.A. Mewaldt, G.M. Mason, J.C. Kasper, I.G. Richardson, M.A. Lee, G.C. Ho. Finding Order in ESP Events?. Introduction. Spring 2008 AGU Meeting: ESP spectral properties Selected events from Richardson list No CIRs, No SEP injections, Valid parameters 30 shocks

forrest-hogan
Télécharger la présentation

Finding Order in ESP Events?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. C.M.S. Cohen R.A. Mewaldt, G.M. Mason, J.C. Kasper, I.G. Richardson, M.A. Lee, G.C. Ho Finding Order in ESP Events?

  2. LWS Team Meeting Introduction • Spring 2008 AGU Meeting: ESP spectral properties • Selected events from Richardson list • No CIRs, No SEP injections, Valid parameters • 30 shocks • Examined ULEIS hourly O intensities • Selected events with clear 0.5 MeV/n peak within 2 hrs. after shock passage • 15 events • Combined ULEIS+SIS spectra • Fit with E-R form to get break points for He-Fe • Examined Q/M dependences • Examined Ebreak(O) dependence on shock parameters

  3. LWS Team Meeting AGU Results • Issues • ULEIS-SIS mismatch • Missing SIS data • ‘Bad’ fits = pre-event intensity • Resolutions • ULEIS corr. for saturation • ?? • Attempt to subtract pre-event intensity But for the AGU, I decided to press on…

  4. LWS Team Meeting Oxygen Ebreakvs shock parameters No Correlations

  5. LWS Team Meeting Q/M Dependences Not systematic, Fe sometimes different

  6. LWS Team Meeting Q/M power-law index correlations No Correlations

  7. LWS Team Meeting ULEIS Saturation Wind/STEP used to determine He/CNO and then replace ULEIS He with scaled ULEIS O spectrum

  8. LWS Team Meeting Pre-event intensity corrections O • Increases not always seen in SIS data • Increases not always seen at same time in ULEIS+SIS data • Selection via O yields different events than selection via He • Pre-shock peaks? • Integration times? He

  9. LWS Team Meeting Pre-event intensity corrections O • Increases not always seen in SIS data • Increases not always seen at same time in ULEIS+SIS data • Selection via O yields different events than selection via He • Pre-shock peaks? • Integration times? He

  10. LWS Team Meeting Pre-event intensitycorrections O • Increases not always seen in SIS data • Increases not always seen at same time in ULEIS+SIS data • Selection via O yields different events than selection via He • Pre-shock peaks? • Integration times? He

  11. LWS Team Meeting Event selection issues (current) • How to select events? • Peak-shock timing • Okay to be before shock arrival (how much)? • How much after shock arrival is okay? • With what tolerance do energies need to peak together? • Increases • How much is required? • At what energy? • For what element? • Background • How to determine? • How to subtract?

  12. LWS Team Meeting Why different responses? • Shock 1 • V=733, R=2.17, Th=78 • Shock 2 • V=734, R=2.81, Th=51

  13. LWS Team Meeting Why different responses? • Shock 1 • V=733, R=2.17, Th=78 • Shock 2 • V=734, R=2.81, Th=51

More Related