1 / 21

Cyclical Program Review 2015-16 Staff Session August 2014

Cyclical Program Review 2015-16 Staff Session August 2014. Contact details. Claire O’Brien QUQAP Coordinator quqap@queensu.ca Ext 75536 Peggy Watkin Associate Director (Academic Initiatives) Peggy.watkin@queensu.ca Ext 75322. Today’s presentation. Cyclical Program Review-what it is

gail-zamora
Télécharger la présentation

Cyclical Program Review 2015-16 Staff Session August 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cyclical Program Review 2015-16Staff SessionAugust 2014

  2. Contact details Claire O’Brien QUQAP Coordinator quqap@queensu.ca Ext 75536 Peggy Watkin Associate Director (Academic Initiatives) Peggy.watkin@queensu.ca Ext 75322

  3. Today’s presentation • Cyclical Program Review-what it is • Who does what • Key points in CPR • Staff roles

  4. What is Cyclical Program Review? • A process aimed at continuous program enhancement • A requirement stipulated by the Council of Ontario Universities • Review process involves the whole unit/department: staff, faculty and students. • Happens once every 8 years

  5. Who is involved? • Department/Academic Unit • Faculty/School • School of Graduate Studies (when a graduate program is involved). • Office of the Provost and Vice-Principal (Academic)

  6. Department/Academic Unit • Prepares nominations for Review Team Members, and rank orders them • Important to start this early on • Template on Provost’s Office QUQAP website • Develops self-study, including CVs and relevant supporting documentation • October 2014 to April 2015

  7. Faculty/School • Provides support to academic unit with review process • Reviews and pre-approves self-study

  8. Faculty/School: Review team • Reviews and pre-approves Review Team nominees • Secures Review Team members once nominee list is approved • Consulting with academic unit, sets date and schedule for Review Team site visit • Arranges travel and accommodation for external reviewers, pays travel expenses and honoraria.

  9. School of Graduate Studies • Where graduate program involved, provides academic units with support for review process • Reviews and pre-approves self-study • Reviews and pre-approves Review Team nominees

  10. Office of the Provost • Responsible for overall process and official documentation • Provost (or delegate) provides final approval for Review Team nominees • Reserves the right to approve self-study before it is sent to Review Team • Supports the Senate Committee on Cyclical Program Review • Liaises with COU Quality Council

  11. Every time I learn something new, it pushes some old stuff out of my brain

  12. Key points in Review Timeline • Development of the self-study documents • Site visit by review team • Review by various levels of governance, leading to Final Assessment Report and Implementation Plan

  13. An Effective Self-Study is: • Reflective, analytical, inquiry-based (SWOT) • Focussed on student learning • Curriculum aligned to learning outcomes • A collaborative process involving all faculty

  14. Unit Staff Role in Self-Study • Providing support for QUQAP committee • Possibly helping arrange faculty session (retreat?) to review curriculum and learning outcomes.

  15. Staff Role in Self-Study (cont) • Project management; keeping development of self-study on track • Collating and formatting documents, including faculty CVs • Ensuring partners have been consulted (CTL, OIRP, Equity Office, Library services) • Arranging for involvement/consultation of students

  16. Review Team Site Visit • In many ways, a central piece of the review process • Good to begin identification of possible reviewers early in the process • Faculty office responsible for much of the organization of the schedule, in conjunction with Unit

  17. Review Team Site Visit: Evening Before

  18. Review Team Site Visit: Day 1

  19. Review Team Site Visit: Day 2

  20. Thank you! • Please check the Provost’s office website for the guide to QUQAP and the templates you’ll need • http://www.queensu.ca/provost/responsibilities/qualityassurance.html

More Related