1 / 48

Liquid State NMR Quantum Computing

Financial supports from Kinki Univ., MEXT and JSPS. Liquid State NMR Quantum Computing. Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan. Plan of Talk. 1. Introduction 2. NMR 3. NMR Hamiltonian 4. Gate Operations 5. Pseudopure State 6. Measurement

gasha
Télécharger la présentation

Liquid State NMR Quantum Computing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Financial supports from Kinki Univ., MEXT and JSPS Liquid State NMR Quantum Computing Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  2. Plan of Talk • 1. Introduction • 2. NMR • 3. NMR Hamiltonian • 4. Gate Operations • 5. Pseudopure State • 6. Measurement • 7. DiVincenzo Criteria • 8. Summary Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  3. 1. Introduction Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  4. Qubits in NMR Molecule Trichloroethylene Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  5. Plan of Talk • 1. Introduction • 2. NMR • 3. NMR Hamiltonian • 4. Gate Operations • 5. Pseudo-Pure State • 6. Measurement • 7. DiVincenzo Criteria • 8. Summary Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  6. NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance )=MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  7. NMR Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  8. Schematic of NMR Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  9. Molecules used in NMR QC Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  10. Plan of Talk • 1. Introduction • 2. NMR • 3. NMR Hamiltonian • 4. Gate Operations • 5. Pseudopure State • 6. Measurement • 7. DiVincenzo Criteria • 8. Summary Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  11. 3.1 Single-Qubit Hamiltonian Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  12. Hamiltonian in Rotating Frame Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  13. Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  14. 2-Qubit Hamiltonian Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  15. Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  16. Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  17. Plan of Talk • 1. Introduction • 2. NMR • 3. NMR Hamiltonian • 4. Gate Operations • 5. Pseudopure State • 6. Measurement • 7. DiVincenzo Criteria • 8. Summary Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  18. 1-Qubit Gates Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  19. Example: Hadamard gate Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  20. Example: Hadamard gate 2 Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  21. Selective addressing Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  22. In resonance: . Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  23. Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  24. Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  25. 2-Qubit Gates: CNOT Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  26. Plan of Talk • 1. Introduction • 2. NMR • 3. NMR Hamiltonian • 4. Gate Operations • 5. Pseudopure State • 6. Measurement • 7. DiVincenzo Criteria • 8. Summary Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  27. Spins are in mixed state! Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  28. Preparation of a pseudopure state in terms of temporal average method Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  29. Temporal average method Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  30. Averaging three contributions Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  31. Plan of Talk • 1. Introduction • 2. NMR • 3. NMR Hamiltonian • 4. Gate Operations • 5. Pseudopure State • 6. Measurement • 7. DiVincenzo Criteria • 8. Summary Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  32. 6.1 Free Induction Decay (FID) |01〉 |00〉 |10〉 |11〉 Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  33. Free Induction Decay (FID) Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  34. Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  35. 6.2 Quantum State Tomography • We want to “measure” the density matrix. • Measure observable such as magnetizations to find linear combinations of the matrix elements of the density matrix. • Not enough equations are obtained. • Deform the density matrix with pulses to obtain enough number of equations. Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  36. 2-Qubit QST Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  37. Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  38. Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  39. Plan of Talk • 1. Introduction • 2. NMR • 3. NMR Hamiltonian • 4. Gate Operations • 5. Pseudopure State • 6. Measurement • 7. DiVincenzo Criteria • 8. Summary Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  40. DiVincenzo Criteria for NMR QC • A scalable physical system with well characterized qubits. • The ability to initialize the state of the qubits to a simple fiducial state, such as |00…0>. • Long decoherence times, much longer than the gate operation time. • A “universal” set of quantum gates. • A qubit-specific measurement capability. Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  41. Scalability • Selective addressing to each qubit becomes harder and hader as the # of qubits increases. Limited # of nuclear spices and overlap of resonance freqs. • Signal strength is suppressed as the # of qubits increases. Readout problem. Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  42. Initialization (pseudopure state) • # of steps required to prepare a pseudopure state increases exponentially as the # of qubits increases. • No real entanglement Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  43. Long decoherence time • Decoherence time • Single-qubit gate operation time • Two-qubit gate op. time • May execute Shor’s algorithm for 21=3X7. Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  44. A “universal” set of quantum gates. • One-qubit gates by Rabi oscillation. • Two-qubit gates by J-coupling. • Cannot turn off interactions; reforcusing technique becomes complicated as the # of qubits increases. Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  45. Measurement capability. • FID is a well-established techunique. • Quantum State Tomograpy and Quantum Process Tomography are OK. • S/N scales as , which limits the # of qubits to ~ 10. Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  46. Still… • NMR QC is commercially available. • It can execute small scale quantum algorithms. • It serves as a test bed for a real QC to come. • May ideas in other realizations are inspired from NMR. • We use NMR QC to demonstrate theoretical ideas, such as decoherence suppression, optimal control of a Hamiltonian etc. Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  47. Plan of Talk • 1. Introduction • 2. NMR • 3. NMR Hamiltonian • 4. Gate Operations • 5. Pseudopure State • 6. Measurement • 7. DiVincenzo Criteria • 8. Summary Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

  48. Liquid state NMR QC is based on a well-established technology. Most of the materials introduced here have been already known in the NMR community for decades. • There are still many papers on NMR QC. • It is required to find a breakthrogh for a liquid state NMR to be a candidate of a working QC. • ENDOR, Solid state NMR… • Thank you for your attention. Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

More Related