1 / 28

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 3. TOOLS OF NORMATIVE ANALYSIS. Welfare Economics. Criteria for Evaluating Government Policy Welfare Economics – branch of economic theory concerned with the social desirability of alternative economic states. . Welfare Economics.

gaye
Télécharger la présentation

CHAPTER 3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CHAPTER 3 TOOLS OF NORMATIVE ANALYSIS

  2. Welfare Economics Criteria for Evaluating Government Policy Welfare Economics – branch of economic theory concerned with the social desirability of alternative economic states.

  3. Welfare Economics • Welfare economics is the systematic method of evaluating the economic implications of alternative resource allocations. • Welfare analysis answers the following questions: • i) Is a given resource allocation efficient? • ii) Who gains and who loses under various allocations, and by how much?

  4. Economic Efficiency • An efficient allocation of resources is one in which it is impossible through any change in resource allocation to make 1 person better off without making someone worse off. • Also called PARETO OPTIMALITY

  5. Indifference Curves • Economic model of Preferences/Tastes • Do you prefer to have:  10 CCC and 2 pieces of CC or 8 CCC and 5 pieces of CC or Indifferent ? • Matter of taste

  6. Assumptions Behind Indifference Curves • Preferences are Complete: Consumers can compare and rank all market baskets. Given A & B, a consumer will either prefer A to B, B to A or be indifferent. Note that preferences ignore costs. • Preferences are Transitive: If prefer A to B and B to C, then prefer A to C. • More is preferred to Less: All goods are desirable such that without considering costs, consumers always prefer more to less.

  7. A consumer’s tastes are represented by her/his indifference curves. • Indifference Curve – represents all combinations of market baskets that provide the same level of satisfaction to a person. The consumer is indifferent (in terms of taste) among the baskets on the curve. • A collection of baskets, all of which the consumer considers equally desirable.

  8. Example: Graph of IC • Example: I am indifferent between the following combinations: • 10 CC and 4 CCC; 5CC and 8 CCC; 3 ½ CC and 14 CCC • Draw those points on the graph and connect: One of my indifference curves. • Indifference Map: describes a person’s preferences for all combinations of CCC & CC.

  9. Slope of IC • MRS • The rate at which the individual is willing to trade the y-axis good for the x-axis good. • Steeper IC: x-axis good is valuable to consumer • Flatter IC: x-axis good is not so valuable to consumer

  10. y v u w x Edgeworth BoxPossible distributions of 2 commodities (total available each year) between 2 people. Eve r 0’ Fig leaves per year s 0 Adam Apples per year Edgeworth Box

  11. E1 E2 E3 A3 A2 A1 Indifference curves in Edgeworth Box Eve r 0’ Fig leaves per year s 0 Adam Apples per year Edgeworth Box

  12. Eg Ap Ah Ag Making Adam better off without Eve becoming worse off Eve r 0’ g h A Pareto Efficient Allocation p Fig leaves per year s 0 Adam Apples per year Edgeworth Box

  13. Eg Ep1 Ag Making Eve better off without Adam becoming worse off Eve r 0’ g p Fig leaves per year p1 A Pareto Efficient Allocation s 0 Adam Apples per year Edgeworth Box

  14. Ep2 Eg Ap2 Ag Making both Adam and Eve better off Eve r 0’ g • Pareto efficient • Pareto improvement p Fig leaves per year p2 p1 s 0 Adam Apples per year Edgeworth Box

  15. Ep2 Eg Ag Ap2 Starting from a different initial point Eve r 0’ g k p4 p3 p Fig leaves per year p2 p1 s 0 Adam Apples per year Edgeworth Box

  16. Ep2 Eg Ag Ap2 The Contract Curve Eve r 0’ g The contract curve p4 p3 p Fig leaves per year p2 p1 s 0 Adam Apples per year Edgeworth Box

  17. Contract Curve • Locus of all Pareto efficient points. • Any point in the Edgeworth Box in which Adam’s indifference curve is just touching (tangent to) Eve’s indifference curve is a Pareto efficient point.

  18. Pareto Efficiency in Consumption MRSaf = MRSaf Eve Adam

  19. Efficiency versus Equity Eve r 0’ p3 Fig leaves per year q p5 s 0 Adam Apples per year Edgeworth Box

  20. What is Fair?

  21. Which Allocation is “Best”?Utility Possibilities Curve • A graph showing the maximum amount of one person’s utility given each level of utility attained by the other person. • All points on or below UPC attainable.

  22. Utility Possibilities Curve: From EB to UPC Adam’s utility U p3 p5 q U Eve’sutility

  23. UPC: Where Should Society Be? • Social Welfare Function: Similar to IC, except it embodies society’s views on the relative well-being of its members. • W=F(Uadam, Ueve) • Embodies society’s sense of “fairness”

  24. Social Indifference Curve W = F(UAdam,UEve) Adam’s utility Increasingsocialwelfare Eve’sutility

  25. Maximizing Social Welfare i Adam’s utility iii ii Eve’sutility

  26. Practice • End of Chapter 3, p. 51, #4 • End of Chapter 3, p. 52, #9 • End of Chapter 3, p. 52, #11a, c • End of Chapter 3, p. 52, #13d • End of Chapter 3, p. 52, #14d

  27. Market Failure • Market Power • monopoly • Nonexistence of Markets • asymmetric information • externality • public good

  28. Buying into Welfare Economics • Individualistic outlook • merit goods • Results orientation • Coherent framework for analyzing policy • Will it have desirable distributional consequences? • Will it enhance efficiency? • Can it be done at a reasonable cost?

More Related