1 / 29

Alternative Assets – Part I

Alternative Assets – Part I. Economics 489 University of Virginia September 5, 2007. Background & History. What Assets Are Not “Alternative Assets?”. Stocks Bonds These are now called “traditional assets”. “Old Fashioned” Asset Allocation. Two assets Diversified stocks (think index)

geneva
Télécharger la présentation

Alternative Assets – Part I

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Alternative Assets – Part I Economics 489 University of Virginia September 5, 2007

  2. Background & History

  3. What Assets Are Not “Alternative Assets?” Stocks Bonds These are now called “traditional assets”

  4. “Old Fashioned” Asset Allocation Two assets Diversified stocks (think index) Diversified bonds Now pick a percentage: For example: 50 % stocks; 50 % bonds More commonly 60 % stocks; 40 % bonds Decide: How much actively managed How much passively managed That’s it

  5. Theory Behind This “The Capital Asset Pricing Model” CAPM Mean Standard Deviation

  6. But That Wasn’t Really CAPM This Is CAPM Mean Risk Free Rate Standard Deviation

  7. Anyway The Language of CAPM is the language of the “traditional” asset allocation: Mean Standard Deviation Correlation Sharpe Ratios Efficiency and Information Ratios Basically the idea of: Diversification Choosing a combination of mean, standard dev Using correlation coefficients to describe “improvements in diversification”

  8. In the mid 1980s Pension funds and endowments began to invest in “real estate” either directly (state of Texas, state of Ohio) or through “funds” (state of Virginia) Rich people began to invest in “hedge funds” and “private equity” funds These are called “high net worth” investors Or, if rich enough, “family offices” These activities were the earliest modern form of “alternative assets”

  9. The 1990s The growth of private equity Endowments and foundations invest in private equity and a few, very few, pension funds Hedge fund takes off in the late 1990s, funded by endowments and high net worth Real estate faltered in the early 1990s because of a real estate collapse in 1989-91

  10. What are the major categories of alternatives? • Real Estate Partnerships (not just real estate, but “real estate partnerships”) • Private Equity • Hedge Funds

  11. What are the “vehicles” or investing in “alternative assets” Partnership or Limited Liability Corporations (LLCs) GP (general partner or managing member) LPs (limited partners – these are the investors) Very recently, some have gone public Fortress Blackstone Lehman Private Equity

  12. Why “partnership” or “LLC” structure? • Avoids regulation • Its not a public company • Not required to file an S-1 or S-11 or whatever • Not required to file 10-Qs or 10-Ks • But….may only deal with “qualified” or “sophisticated” investors • Institutions (endowments, foundations, pensions) • Rich people • Biggest advantage – fee structure

  13. Basis Points – an aside Definition: 100 basis points is one percent or 1 % For Example: If an investment manager charges 50 basis points for Managing $ 100 for a customer, then the annual fee Will be $ 500,000 per year

  14. Applies mainly to private equity and real estate LLCs or partnerships Investor agrees to invest $ 100 million No money is sent until the partnership actually makes an investment Then, a “capital call” is issued and the investor sends in money This does not apply to hedge funds, who receive the entire $ 100 million at the time the investor has formally committed to becoming an LP “Capital Calls” – another aside

  15. Lowest are index funds (Vanguard, Fidelity) Equity: 6 -10 basis points per year Debt: 12 basis points per year Exchange traded funds (index funds that can be purchased as if they were common stocks) Equity: 6 – 60 basis points per year Debt: 12 to 100 basis points per year Professional money management for institutions Equity: 20 to 50 basis points per year Debt: 6 to 25 basis points per year Mutual funds (actively managed) Equity: 150 to 200 basis points Debt: 100 to 150 basis points Investment Management Fees in General

  16. “two and twenty” Annual “commitment fee” is 2 percent or 200 basis points (regardless of how well the assets are managed) For private equity or real estate, the commitment fee is to be paid even if no investments are ever undertaken and no “capital calls” are ever made Typically paid quarterly (50 basis points per quarter) The “twenty” is the “carried interest” or known more simply as “the carry” Typically paid quarterly with High water marks Sometimes a “hurdle rate” (this is common in private equity and real estate – but uncommon in hedge funds) Other fees Fees never discussed but are permitted by the partnership or LLC agreement Often cover Chartered air flights for fund manager Office expense for manager Etc Almost all agreements permit this Most investors are not aware of this Investors don’t read the agreements Alternative Asset Fee Structure

  17. Give private equity firm $ 100 million Suppose they make no investments over four years Every year you will pay them $ 2 million Except for your payment of $ 2 million, nothing else ever happens – you give them no more money because they made no “capital calls” Give a hedge fund $ 100 million with a “2 and 20” fee structure End of year one: fund makes 20 percent gross return Fees: $ 2 million commitment fee 20 % of $ 20 million gross return = $ 4 million “carry” fee Total fees: $ 6 million Investors make 14 % net: $ 20 million minus $ 6 million The following year fund loses $ 12 million Fees: 2 % of $ 114 million equals$ 2.28 million Investors lose 14+ %: $ 2.28 million in fees and $ 12 million in gross loses No “carry” Investor now as $ 99.72 million; Fees over two years amount to $ 8.28 Million Examples

  18. Example Suppose you raise a $ 100 million fund Management fee will be $ 2 million first year regardless of how well the fund performs Make 20 percent in first year (market might be up 30 percent) Performance fee with be 20 percent of $ 18 million, or $ 3.6 million Clients make 14.4 percent net of fees Net Fee Earned – 560 basis points (which means 5.6%)

  19. Make $ 20 million gross first year Fee is $ 5.6 million $ 114.4 million Then lose $ 20 million Start with Fee is $ 2.288 million $ 100 million $ 92.112 million left Gross returns are zero for the two years, but fees amount to $ 7.888 million

  20. Gross return is zero in two years $ 100 million $ 86.4 million Make $ 50 million fee is $ 11.6 million Lose $ 50 million First year Fee is $ 2 million $ 48 million Total fees $ 13.6 million

  21. High Water Mark At year end (or quarter end depending on fund rules), performance fee is limited to 20 percent of (end of period value less previous highest end of period value)

  22. Example Performance fee only on this difference No performance fee

  23. Better Example Performance fee here No performance fee here

  24. Sometimes this refers only to the “high water mark” But, in some cases, it calls for a return of performance fees earned in prior periods The “Clawback”

  25. Other Terms of LLCs • Lock-up • Restricts the ability of an investor to withdraw their money • PE or RE lock-ups are typically 7 – 10 years • Hedge funds usually do not have “lockups” • “Liquidity” • Daily liquidity • Quarterly liquidity • Restrictions on “liquidity”

  26. Who are the Investors • Originally rich people • High net worth investors (“sophisticated”) • Family offices • Institutions up to 2000 • Real estate 1980s, then bust in late 80s • Private equity – boomed in the 90s • Hedge funds – substantial growth second half of the 1990s

  27. 2000-2003 Today 13,300 12,000 This drop created the the stampede for hedge funds by institutions 8,000 780 Mch 2000 Nov 2003 1981

  28. Post 2003 • An explosion in demand for real estate funds, private equity funds, hedge funds (Hedge funds went from $ 40 billion in 1981 to $ 800 billion in 2001 to $ 1.7 trillion in 2007) • However returns were a different picture • Stocks and bonds had an explosive rally from 2003 to the present • Hedge funds have performed poorly (compared to stocks) • Real estate and private equity funds have been the very top performer of all asset classes • If you use five year return comparisons from 2001-2006, then funds with alternatives look good because of hedge funds. If you look only at 2005-07, then hedge funds are a drag on performance but private equity and real estate are a boon to performance

  29. More Next Week

More Related