1. After Action Review Tempest Express 4

2. AGENDA • AAR ROE • REVIEW GOALS • PARTICIPANT COMMENTS • GOALS SCORE-CARD

3. AAR ROE • INTERACTIVE PROCESS • MAXIMUM AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION • FOCUS ON IMPROVING THE PROCESS

4. MPAT TE- 4 Workshop Goals • Improve Interoperability and Multinational Cooperation • Reduce Crisis Response Time and Increase Planning Effectiveness • Develop and Become Familiar With MNF SOP

5. CPG 1 – LTC Vagi Oala CPG 2 – MAJ Tim Garriock CPG 3 – MAJ Shariff IO/NGO – Sharon McHale CECG – MAJ Tony Krogh Senior Mentor – BG(ret) Hvidegaard MPAT TE-4 PARTICIPANT COMMENTS

6. CPG 1SUSTAIN / IMPROVE • SUSTAIN • Academic reviews immediately prior to each CAP session • IMPROVE • Prepare / Provide glossary and acronym list to be handed out before starting the conference • Make CPGs smaller to reduce noise level and maximize participation by all delegates (create a fourth CPG) • Consider providing a facilitator/mentor to each CPG

7. CPG 1 WORKSHOP DESIGN COMMENTS • Is the schedule a good template for future workshops? • Need more time for CPG planning sessions • “Kick start” mission analysis with product already partially completed • Is the balance between work and cultural interaction about right? • Excellent balance; perhaps ENDEX social event? • Are the CAP academics beneficial? • MNF SOP workshop participants missed out • Were the subject matter briefs beneficial? • Need more emphasis on PK, less on HA

8. CPG 2SUSTAIN / IMPROVE • SUSTAIN • Social event and Dinner were extremely valuable for team building • COA comparison final process • IMPROVE • Consider rethinking the conference focus (Training or Teambuilding) • Have COA leads fully develop COA before conference and guide the group through the process (have canned solution to keep process moving) • Prepare Staff Estimates ahead of time

9. CPG 2WORKSHOP DESIGN COMMENTS • Is the schedule for MPAT TE-4 a good template for future workshops? • IPB prepared staff estimate needs to be promulgated in more detail • Is the balance between work and cultural interaction about right? • Outstanding. • Are the CAP academics beneficial? • Varied answers – repetitive – possibly OK; • Baseline of operational terms, processes, etc needs to be established and all need to be aware – battle book?; • All need to participate in first week training; • DJTFAC did an outstanding job. • Were the subject matter briefs (ICRC, NGO’s etc) beneficial? • Additional briefs from those who “have been there” – mil/civ • Clear objectives to SME’s so briefs are relevant

10. CPG 3SUSTAIN / IMPROVE • SUSTAIN • NGO, COE, UN, Retired Service member participation – great value • Keep Tempest Express focused on planning • IMPROVE • Integrate MPAT into an execution exercise so that the MPAT planners can see the total process • Add a media panel as part of academics so that MPAT planners can get to know and understand the media’s roles and point of view similar to what was done with NGOs, UN etc…

11. CPG 3WORKSHOP DESIGN COMMENTS • Is the schedule for MPAT TE-4 a good template for future workshops? • YES • Is the balance between work and cultural interaction about right? • YES • Are the CAP academics beneficial? • YES • Were the subject matter briefs (ICRC, NGO’s etc) beneficial? • YES

12. IO / NGOSUSTAIN / IMPROVE • SUSTAIN • IO/NGO PARTICIPATION • COA DEVELOPMENT PROCESS • RED CELL TEAM • IMPROVE • USE HUMANITARIANS AS ‘RESPONSE CELL’ FOR CTF PLANNERS • EXPAND TO INCLUDE DONORS AND HOST NATION REPS • MORE CONCENTRATION ON COORD PROCESS DURING EXECUTION PLANNING PHASE OF CAP • TERMINOLOGY

13. CECGSUSTAIN / IMPROVE • SUSTAIN • Detailed scenario and database information • Automated RFI tool • IMPROVE • Enhance RFI tool to include functional area categories • Create a tool to provide daily RFI summaries • Develop queries/reports based on RFI categories

14. MPAT TE- 4 Workshop Goals • Improve Interoperability and Multinational Cooperation • Reduce Crisis Response Time and Increase Planning Effectiveness • Develop and Become Familiar With MNF SOP

15. MPAT TE-4 ANY CLOSING COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS