1 / 12

Generalizations about Indians and Empires

Generalizations about Indians and Empires. Where Europeans settled in large numbers, built farms and towns, established mining operations, etc., they soon established control.

gil-cain
Télécharger la présentation

Generalizations about Indians and Empires

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Generalizations about Indians and Empires • Where Europeans settled in large numbers, built farms and towns, established mining operations, etc., they soon established control. • In the interior of the Americas, away from areas of dense European settlement, Indians remained more independent, into the 20th century in some places

  2. L.G. Moses & Margaret Connell Szasz, “’My Father, have pity on me!’ Indian Revitalization Movements of the Late-Nineteenth Century,” in Religion in the West, ed. F.M. Szasz (Manhattan, KA: Sunflower Univ. Press, 1984) • In the Spirit of Crazy Horse (PBS documentary; YouTube) • Karl Jacoby, Shadows at Dawn • http://brown.edu/Research/Aravaipa/peoples.html • PekkaHämäläinen, “The Rise and Fall of Plains Indian Horse Cultures,” Journal of American History 90 (Dec. 2003), 833-62

  3. Middle Ground Relations • French colonization efforts, 1500s-1600s • Wars with the Iroquois, 1609-1701 • Inability to use force to control Indian peoples

  4. Defining the Middle Ground • Places where neither side could determine the relationship (militarily, economically, politically) • For pragmatic reasons, negotiated a third culture, a common world neither wholly Indian nor European • Each side was forced to adapt, but also had some room to adapt on its own terms • Indians and Europeans were not exotic or alien to each other • Sometimes was violent • The middle ground declined when European-Americans became dominant economically and militarily

  5. The “Pays d’en Haut” or Upper Country

  6. Examples of the Middle Ground • Fur trade • “Coureur de bois” & “Voyageurs” • Military relations • Inter-marriage • “country” marriages; “á la façon du pays” • Métis • Missions • Onontio

  7. Ties Between Metropolitan Centers and Frontiers

  8. Impact on Indians • Rising standards of living (e.g., new opportunities for Indian women) • Connection to military alliances • Technological dependence, over time • Environmental degradation • Decline of fur-bearing game and food game in the 1700s, east of the Mississippi • Disease

  9. Decline of the Middle Ground • British conquest of New France (1760) • Proclamation Line (1763) • Economic decline for Indians in eastern North America, 1750-1820 • Social problems in Indian communities • “shatter zones” • American Revolution • Joseph Brant, Molly Brant, & General William Johnson • Impact of the Revolution & Independence • The War of 1812 • Policies in the U.S. and BNA (Canada): reservations & removal

  10. Conclusions • Successful adaptation, resistance for centuries by many Indians • The material basis of Indian decline was environmental (disease, loss of resources), economic (decline of fur trade, greater manufacturing power of European-Americans), and political-military • In North America, they became wards, victims, only after loss of power (no longer could determine the course of their own adaptation)

More Related