SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Focus on feedback

gizela avatar
13 diapositives · 337 Views · Aug 21, 2014

Focus on feedback. Carol Johnston Ciannon Cazaly. Focus on feedback. QoT CEQ Teaching structure at Melbourne Importance of feedback in Formative Assessment Move to modularisation and multiple choice What do student want in feedback ?. The study. Assignment analysis

Focus on feedback - slide 1
01 / 13Focus on feedback
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Focus on feedback
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Focus on feedback Carol Johnston Ciannon Cazaly

  2. Focus on feedback • QoT • CEQ • Teaching structure at Melbourne • Importance of feedback in Formative Assessment • Move to modularisation and multiple choice • What do student want in feedback ?

  3. The study • Assignment analysis • Student and tutor survey • Student and tutor semi structured interviews

  4. Survey • Quantity • Quality • Timing • Student action • Feed Forward Brown, Gibbs and Glover (2003).

  5. 49% response rate • Respondents: Females 69% and international students 15% cf whole cohort 50% female and 30% international; 80% respondents studied at uni for two years or less • No significant differences between local and international students • Males more positive about the feedback they receive than females

  6. Quantity – want more feedback • Timing – seen as too late • Quality –around 20% did not find it useful • Action – do read feedback provided 39% do not • Feed forward – most student satisfied 18% were not

  7. The Assignment1000 words, 20% • 31% of students allowed assignments to be analysed – 99 assignments • Coded three times • Quantity- 8 tutors, 8 interventions per assignment • Quality • Content • Motivational • Feed forward • Depth Glover and Brown (2006)

  8. Depth of feedback • Category 1: a tutor acknowledgement of an error, issue or problem, and draw the student’s attention to the weakness; • Category 2: acknowledge an error, issue or problem and provide a correct response or advice on seeking a correct response. • Category 3: acknowledgement of an error and correct response, the tutor comment also provides a reason why the student’s answer was inappropriate. There is an element of feed forward in category three comments.

  9. Strategies for improvement • Train tutors to increase depth of feedback and instruct students in how to use this form of feedback. • Support students in understanding language of feedback • Model answers ??? Cumulative marking schemes ?? • Raise level of communication about feedback so that perceptions of tutors and students can be more closely aligned.