1 / 28

Survey about the physics of z’ gauge boson

Survey about the physics of z’ gauge boson. Qisheng zhu 11-03-31. outline. Introductions Models Model independent approach Current constraints Summary and conclusions. Introductions. Motivations : Implications :. models. Divide into two types : 1: Perturbative (E6,GLR,GSM models)

hao
Télécharger la présentation

Survey about the physics of z’ gauge boson

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Survey about the physics of z’ gauge boson Qisheng zhu 11-03-31

  2. outline • Introductions • Models • Model independent approach • Current constraints • Summary and conclusions

  3. Introductions Motivations : Implications:

  4. models • Divide into two types : 1: Perturbative (E6,GLR,GSM models) 2: strongly coupled gauge theories.

  5. E6 models • the surviving E6 generator

  6. Generalised left-right symmetry models (GLR)

  7. Generalised sequential models (GSM)

  8. table:model parameters and couplings.

  9. Strong coupled model • Four site higgsless model

  10. Z’ mass and z-z’ mixing

  11. Z’ couplings • weak angle • new gauge coupling

  12. New chiral coupling • vector and axial couplings.

  13. Z’ production and decay in the narrow width approximation • In the narrow width approximation (NWA) • The peak cross-section

  14. assuming only sm particles in the final states • Wu, Wd only depend on the collider energy and the z’ mass , • All the model dependence of the cross-section is therefore contained in the two coefficients, cu and cd. These parameters can be calculated from the couplings and vector/axial couplings.

  15. Finite width effect • the experimental search for an extra Z′ boson and the discrimination of the SM backgrounds could strongly depend on the realistic Z′ width. • Moreover the theoretical prediction of the Z′ production cross section also depends on its width.

  16. Di-lepton invariant mass distribution for the Z′ boson production in various models at the Tevatron (left panel) andLHC@7TeV (right panel).

  17. Current constraints • From precision electroweak data : Include purely weak ve and v-hadron weak neutral current (WNC) scattering, and weak electromagnetic interference in heavy atoms and in e+-e- ,and ppbar scattering, precision z-pole physics. • From collider

  18. Constraints from collider

  19. Expected lhc potential at 7TeV to probe Z’ models • the LHC@7TeV can extend the limits on Mz’ by about 500 GeV when compared to the Tevatron. For example, the limit on the SM-like Z′ boson could be extended from 1020 GeV to about 1520 GeV

  20. Probe the spin • a spin-0 particle could correspond to a sneutrino in R-parity violating supersymmetric (SUSY) models. A spin-2 resonance could be identified as a Kaluza-Klein (KK) excited graviton in Randall-Sundrum models. However a spin-1 Z′ is by far the most common possibility usually considered. • Following the discovery of a resonance in the di-leptons channels, the next step would be to establish its spin-1 nature.

  21. This can be done by the angular distribution in the resonance rest frame, which for spin-1 is where theta* is the angle between the incident quark or lepton and fermion f .For a hadron collider one does not know which hadron is the source of the q ,the ambiguity washes out in the determination of the distribution characteristic of spin 1. • The spin can also be probed in e+e− by polarization asymmetries

  22. Summary and conclusions • Perturbative gauge models and strongly coupled models, each class of models is defined in terms of a continuous mixing angle variable. • in order to facilitate the connection between experimental data and theoretical models, we advocated the narrow width approximation. • the experimental limits on the z’ boson cross section can be expressed as contour in the cu-cd plane, with a unique contour for each value of z’ boson mass. • the narrow width approximation requires an appropriate di-lepton invariant mass window cut around the mass of z’ mass .

  23. A limitation of this approach is that it ignores the effect of the SUSY and exotics (and right-handed neutrinos) on the width 􀀀Z′ • Another limitation of our approach is that it ignores the effects of Z − Z′ mixing which is quite model dependent, However such effects must be small due to the constraints from electroweak precision measurements, so such effects will not have a major effect.

More Related