1 / 14

Why are these papers important?

Discussion of: “The Diffusion of Green Labels in the Residential Sector: Evidence from Europe” Dirk Brounen and Nils Kok “Green Residences” Dora Costa and Matt Kahn by Christopher Knittel, UC Davis and NBER Green Building, The Economy & Public Policy December 3, 2009.

haruki
Télécharger la présentation

Why are these papers important?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Discussion of:“The Diffusion of Green Labels in the Residential Sector: Evidence from Europe”Dirk Brounen and Nils Kok“Green Residences”Dora Costa and Matt Kahn by Christopher Knittel, UC Davis and NBERGreen Building, The Economy & Public PolicyDecember 3, 2009

  2. Why are these papers important?

  3. Bottom line • Two very nice, interesting, and important papers • Both bring very rich data sets to issues surrounding the energy efficiency of residential home buildings and energy use, more generally • My comments are going to be of the “I want more” variety

  4. Brounen and Kok: “Green labels” • Exploits the fact that since 1/08 “every” Dutch housing market transaction requires an “energy performance certificate” • Score ranges from G to A+++ • Post-1999 construction and monuments are exempt from mandatory disclosure, can also get a waiver • Data: • Transaction level data for sales with property characteristics, post-law only • Analysis: • Probability of having a certificate • Time on the market • Transaction price

  5. Probability of having a certificate • Logit probability model as a function of vintage, monument, housing type, quarter of transaction, property and neighborhood characteristics/fixed effects • Includes entire sample • Actually two separate decisions: • 1. Do I get a waiver when I am “required”, • 2. Do I get a certificate when I am not required • Might be interesting to disentangle these • Also, I’d be interested in knowing if there are “peer” effects, or evidence of “unraveling” • Does what the energy efficiency of you, relative to your neighbors, matter? • Certification of recent sales matter?

  6. Time on market and price regressions • Regress time on market and price on: • Set of score dummies, • Vintage dummies, • TOM (if price regression) (?), • Housing type dummies, new construction, • Quarter of transaction dummies, • Size, rooms, monument, central heat, maintenance interior/exterior, neighborhood characteristics • Variation: within vintage differences in Energy Score • E.g., on average how much more does a 19XXs, detached, `A’ home sell for compared to a 19XXs, detached, `G’ home • May want to think of ways to account for selection

  7. TOM & price results • TOM results: • Across all transactions, greener buildings take longer to sell • Note: omitted group here is no-certificate or `G’ • Would like to see the G category separated • Across just certificated transaction, not the case • Explanation for difference? • Price results: • More efficient homes sell for more • Only show results for certificated sample. Why? • Estimates are large: • `A’ homes sell for 12% more than G homes • Comment: Can we push on them more? • Compare the price effects with the costs of going from G to A • Does the investment pay when information is available? • Can we get pre-law data and attempt to estimate benefit pre-information?

  8. Concern: More time should be spent on… • Is it only energy efficiency that is different? • Why is one 1980s home more efficient than another? • We may think it is because it was recently renovated • Did the renovation only change the efficiency? • Or, is most of the variation coming from differences at the time of construction? • They control for central heating, whether interior and exterior that is “good”, whether insulation is “good” • Is that enough? Would like to see more discussion • Quality variables have wrong sign • Pre-law data available? • Not a perfect fix, but may be able to track the same house being sold under both regimes

  9. Costa and Kahn: “Green residences” • Uses a number of exciting Sacramento region household-level data sets to get at issues of: • How construction vintage (i.e., codes) is associated with usage • Whether the price of electricity, at the time of construction, is correlated with usage • Correlations between usage and neighborhood demographics (e.g., ideologies) • State-wide media conservation campaigns (“Flex your Power”) • How sale prices are correlated with solar panels • How much of the Rosenfeld curve can be explained by changes in demographics

  10. Results • Seven data sets, tons of tables! • Too many to list

  11. Questions • Am I reading these as interesting correlations, or something more? • I wasn’t sure • At one point the paper calls the coefficients “treatment effects” • This raises the issue just discussed • Teach everyone Spanish? Ban Fox News? • Can we provide additional evidence? • For many of the RHS variables we can probably come up with plausible treatment effects • E.g., Large Plasma TV, one small LCD • Can compare these to the estimates • Requires additional assumptions, but may be fairly convincing bounds • PV results too large?

  12. Give me more! • I think the media campaign results should be their own paper • More needs to be done, but this is an important result • Spend an entire paper convincing the reader that nothing else was going on during these campaigns • Time and Time-squared included, which is promising • Almost an RD design • Show the pictures! • Can we see the drop in graphs? • What were the costs of the campaign? • Is it cost effective?

  13. Nitpicking • Rosenfeld effect (It’s own paper, too) • Give me more! Discuss econometrics issues more • Think more about what should be included and what shouldn’t • For example, hybrid coefficient may grab some of liberal coefficient • Functional forms • We tend to migrate to lnY on lnX • Does that make sense here? • Do we think a plasma TV adds a certain percentage to usage? • Solar panels?

  14. Summary • Two interesting papers using awesome data • Both can push results more and do more to convince us that the estimates are causal

More Related