1 / 28

Illinois-American Water Company & Great River’s Land Trust

Water Quality Trading – Point Source for Non-point Source Sediments: Piasa Creek Watershed Project. Illinois-American Water Company & Great River’s Land Trust. Legend of the Piasa Bird. Location of Alton IL. Great River Road Scenic Highway. “Old” Alton Water Treatment Facility.

hawa
Télécharger la présentation

Illinois-American Water Company & Great River’s Land Trust

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Water Quality Trading – Point Source for Non-point Source Sediments:Piasa Creek Watershed Project Illinois-American Water Company & Great River’s Land Trust

  2. Legend of the Piasa Bird

  3. Location of Alton IL

  4. Great River Road Scenic Highway

  5. “Old” Alton Water Treatment Facility

  6. “Wet” Alton Water Treatment Facility

  7. “New” Alton Water Treatment Facility

  8. The Challenge • Old facility • Site specific exemption • Non-standard NPDES permit • Direct discharge allowed • Exempt from TSS and total iron effluent standards • New facility • “Old” regulatory relief does not apply • Must apply for/justify new relief

  9. The Regulators • IL Pollution Control Board (IPCB) • Writes environmental law • Arbitrates contested issues • IL EPA • Administers/enforces environmental law • Writes/issues NPDES permit • Cannot write a permit that IL law does not allow for

  10. The Stakeholders • Owner, Illinois-American Water Company • Regulators, IEPA, IPCB • Local Interest Groups (economic, aesthetic) • Environmental groups (local, state, national) • Customers

  11. The Study (SSIS) • Site Specific Impact Study • ENSR environmental engineers • Consider all regulatory tests (BPJ,BPT, BCT) • Compare residual management control technologies • Two Alternatives • Lagoons, dewatering, landfilling • Direct discharge

  12. The comparison Direct Discharge • No water quality impacts • No landfill depletion • No aesthetic impacts on area • No cost • No brainer (?) Lagoon & Landfill • $7.4 million capital costs, $0.42 million annual O&M • Avg 4 trucks/day on Scenic Route 3 • 8,800 yd3/yr of landfill space • Local Opposition

  13. The Impacts • SSIS findings: • TSS impact insignificant • 91% of solids originate from river • Metals nil (note reliance on PAS) • No harm to aquatic life • No unnatural buildup • Mussel survey no problems • IEPA – nope!

  14. The Solution • Partnership with Great Rivers Land Trust (GRLT) • Piasa Creek Watershed Plan • Sustainable reduction in overall sediment loading to the Mississippi River • IL-AWC contribution of $4.15 million over 10-year period • Minimum 2:1 reduction (6600 ton/year) • Regulatory Approval • IEPA, IPCB • Adjusted Standard AS 99-6 written into IL law • Terms of AS 99-6 and contract w/GRLT written into special conditions of NPDES permit

  15. Great Rivers Land Trust • Local Non-Profit Organization • Primary Mission: • Preservation of scenic and ecologically valuable land along the Alton Lake Heritage Corridor, 20,000 acres • Land preservation efforts accomplished through easements and land acquisitions • Goal: 5,000 to 10,000 acres protected in next 10 years

  16. Piasa Creek Watershed Plan • Primary Objective: • “To enhance and restore the natural non-point source pollutant mitigation functions of the watershed”

  17. Piasa Creek Watershed

  18. Watershed Major Problem Areas • Planning and Regulation • Sewage • Stormwater Runoff and Erosion • Uncontrolled urbanization • Sediment • Road salts, fertilizers, pesticides • Septic tank effluent • Other pollutants

  19. Meeting the Objective • Land acquisition and conservation easements • Grassed waterways • Filter strips • Storm water detention basins • Terraces • Grade control structures • Stream bank stabilization • Educational programs (communities, schools, landowners)

  20. Project Timeline • Year 1 (2001): Update 1995 plan, identify potential sediment reduction sites, contact landowners. • Years 2-5: Install sediment control structures. • Year 6: IEPA review. • Years 6-10: Installation of sediment control structures continues. Achieve 2:1 suspended solids reduction.

  21. Project Metrics • Goal 6600 tons/year sediment reduction • Use accepted sediment control practices • Sediment savings estimated in partnership with SWCD • Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation • Resource inventory worksheets for each project • Projected year-end 2003: 2613 tons/year

  22. Streambank Erosion

  23. Streambank Stabilization

  24. Storm water basins

  25. Erosion control

  26. Boy Scout Lake

  27. The Benefits • Avoid capital and O&M $ for lagooning, landfilling • Rate impact on customer reduced • No sludge hauling trucks along the Great River Road • Save landfill space • Reduced net sediment load to the river • Precedent/model for other creative beneficial partnerships

  28. Questions? Brent Gregory, Director Water Quality Illinois-American Water Company 618-239-3249 bgregory@illinoisamerican.com

More Related