1 / 33

Project Status

Project Status. John N. Galayda. LCLS Project Summary Assessment. Technical Status, Accomplishments Current Status, Conventional Facilities Contingency Analysis. Project Walk-Down- Organization/Hires. Jess Albino starting 14 August Assoc. Dir. Engineering – Two interviews

hbessie
Télécharger la présentation

Project Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project Status John N. Galayda

  2. LCLS Project Summary Assessment • Technical Status, Accomplishments • Current Status, Conventional Facilities • Contingency Analysis

  3. Project Walk-Down- Organization/Hires • Jess Albino starting 14 August • Assoc. Dir. Engineering – Two interviews • 3 more candidates • Offer out after Labor Day • Barry Miller will continue working with LCLS beyond October • James Dee, procurement representative in the field, arriving August 10 • Joe Frisch joining Paul Emma’s group • Diagnostics Expert

  4. Project Walk-Down - Injector • Laser installed, operating • 3 mJ in the UV • Gun slightly late to power up, not a concern • Power supplies tested with controls • Scanning wires tested with controls • Magnets • Gun solenoid measured (unique challenge) • Dogleg magnets BX01/02 measured, passed • 23 Injector quads measured, passed • 3 GTL quads measured – passed as quads, flunked as dipoles • Linac solenoid in measurement • BXS injector spectrometer core delivered from LBNL- coils near completion at SLAC

  5. Light from Thales Jedi 120 Hz pump laser

  6. Project Walk-Down - Injector • SAD draft in preparation • Magnet measurements proceeding • Potential conflict with SPEAR chicane magnet measurement • MCOR30 supplies testing underway via EPICS

  7. Linac • BC-1 Dipoles (Scanditronix) – Arrived Monday • BC-1 “tweaker” quads delivered, measured • Refurbishment of some FFTB magnets underway • Blanket Ordering agreements in place and in use

  8. Controls • SLAC expert engaged in connecting existing Linac software applications to LCLS • Modernization of applications will be delayed • Implementation of fast feedback may be delayed until 2007 • SPPS experience suggests this will have minor effect on commissioning • Accelerator Controls Budget • Growth in PS installation • Working to cut it down

  9. Undulator • Single-Undulator Test results show great progress • ‘Long-term test’ beginning at ANL, a continuation of SUT • Undulator vacuum chamber design still in question • Welding tests on the 4-weld chamber are underway • Magnet measurements at SLAC • Dover bench ready to measure Keff • New system for undulator measurement- first data

  10. Six undulators from Hi-Tech on the way to SLAC. 08/18/06

  11. Strongbacks, magnets, and poles staged for assembly @Metalex

  12. X-Ray Transport/Optics/Diagnostics • Design for gas attenuator is maturing • prototype results very nice • Incorporate gas fluorescence intensity monitor in the middle of attenuator • Offset mirrors issues • Radiation safety • Must proceed to specification and order

  13. X-Ray Experiment Systems • Layout of experiments influenced by recent thought within LUSI teams • Diffractive deflection of x-ray beam to each of several set-ups • Deflectors in the FEE • Radiation safety • Passing XR beam through a hutch to a downstream experiment • Analogous to some experience at SSRL

  14. LCLS Installation and Commissioning Time-Line Drive-Laser Commissioning undulator hall ready LTU/und. Install First FEL Light Drive-Laser Install linac/BC2 Install First Spont. Light M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J 2006 2007 2008 June 2006 Gun/Inj./BC1 Install (8/21 – 1/5) Gun/Inj./BC1 Commissioning linac/BC2 Commissioning FEL Comm. LTU/undulator Commissioning Revised June 7, 2006 – P. Emma

  15. Civil Construction • Turner Project Executive: Bill Jangraw • Jacobs Contract Administrator: Jim Cranston • Proposed construction schedule: • Beampath installation can begin November 2007 • Beam Transport Hall • Undulator Hall • Front End • Near Hall • Press-fit to funding profile (M. Reichanadter presentation) but- • Contingency inadequate for this stage of Project

  16. Civil Construction • Research Yard/FFTB ready for Turner to start • Just in time for Turner mobilization • 11 September: Alpine Road Gate will be dedicated construction entrance

  17. Research Yard Ready for Start of Beam Transport Hall Construction- 28 August 2006

  18. Civil Construction • Group #1 packages awarded, with exception of fire protection • Low bidder raised bid by $400K, claiming a misunderstanding of seismic requirements for support of sprinkler hardware • May re-bid

  19. CLOC • 2-story CLOC out to bid in two groups • Schedule to get bids by • 9/28/06 for CLOC (Bid Group #3) • 10/3/06 for CLOC (Bid Group #4) • About 180 qualified bidders

  20. Bid Group 2 • Estimate was $6.2M – adjusted bids sum to $9.9M • Site walls shifted from bid group #1 to #2 • Est.= $820K , Award=$702K • Low bidder on metal buildings - dropped out • 2nd bidder higher by $800K • Will re-bid • Bidder response disappointing • Despite extended bid deadline • Despite extra effort for outreach • 5 packages with one bid • No bids for ceramic tile, signage

  21. LCLS Projected Total Civil Construction Costs • $104.6 award of all bid packages • Based on market experience for bid groups 1+2 • Added $1M for metal buildings • Assuming re-bid does not help • Extrapolated to 2-floor CLOC (bid groups 3+4) • 2-floor CLOC estimate: • Apply market correction from bid groups 1+2 to 3-floor CLOC • Subtract $3M (trying to be conservative here)

  22. Experience at LLNL • Actual results for $5M buildings built at LLNL • Similarly spartan office buildings for project teams • Price is fixed, bidders propose square footage No award will be made

  23. Clear Evidence of Recent Change in Marketplace • LLNL information is about as close to a physics experiment as one can get • Same building specifications • Same contracting • Same location • Bidders’ perceived risk MUST be low • Different year

  24. CLOC Cost Estimate • Jacobs: $250/gsf • Cost of external HVAC and site preparation not included here (it was in other bid packages) • 3rd floor minimally occupiable • 2-Story CLOC is 49,100 gsf • $597/gsf Project Office extrapolation, in contingency analysis

  25. Contingency Analysis from 7 February Lehman Review

  26. Contingency Analysis 15 June 2006

  27. Contingency Analysis 29 August 2006 • Reduced deficit due to • Reduced TEC (increased contingency) $2.5M • Estimated CF hard cost estimate reduced $1.3M • Technical sys. contingency reduced to 20% $3.0M • Foreseen draws on contingency not shown here $5.4M

  28. Estimate to Complete Still Underway • $5M potential growth from tech. areas • Still struggling to economize • Some scope reductions are still possible • Reduce R&D effort in FY2007-2008 - $3.6M • Aggressive de-staffing in FY2008-2009 • $4M-7M potential • Still needs detailed scrutiny • Bid results will determine • Extremity of measures to close gap

  29. Near Term Strategy • Beam Path & CLOC VE items identified (but not yet in contingency analysis): additional $1.0M - $1.5M • Directed Jacobs to implement VE immediately • Incorporate VE with Turner, post-award

  30. Working on Planning Transit to Operations 45 FTE’s 44 FTE’s 46 FTE’s Annualized

  31. Summary • Injector and Bunch Compressor 1 will be ready for commissioning in January • Preparations for commissioning the injector • Address engineering, physics, operations, safety • Undulator Systems Coming Together • X-Ray Front End design maturing • NO COMPROMISE to capability of FEL

  32. Summary • Facing a very tough decision on CLOC scope • Financial impact versus CLOC functionality • Civil Construction organized, prepared to start • DOE/SLAC/LCLS must rapidly choose a course of action for CLOC construction

  33. End of Presentation

More Related