1 / 22

Enhancing Accreditation Perspectives in Clinical Education Programs

This session led by Brian Bogdanowicz, Director of Clinical Education at The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, aims to shift the approach of program directors and athletic training faculty by adopting the mindset of site visitors. Attendees will learn to evaluate their programs critically, engage in discussions across different programs, and familiarize themselves with the updated 2005 Accreditation Standards. The session emphasizes the importance of accreditation in ensuring quality education while providing strategies to interact effectively with site visit teams.

heba
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing Accreditation Perspectives in Clinical Education Programs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mock Program Review Brian Bogdanowicz Director of Clinical Education The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

  2. Goals of this Session • Change our perspective from Program Directors & Athletic Training faculty → site visitors • Leave ready to evaluate our programs with eyes of a site visitor • Encourage discussion b/n different programs & program faculty • Become more familiar with the new 2005 Accreditation Standards

  3. Disclaimer!!! • What we CANNOT do… • Address specific questions relating to your programs • These questions should be submitted to JRC-AT office through official communication (mail or e-mail) • Make assumptions that our findings of today's scenarios are endorsed by JRC-AT or other organizations

  4. Lets remember… • The Purpose of Accreditation • Provide a MINIMUM standard of education • Protect the public • Protect the student • So the accreditation documents are guidelines that establish the minimum standards • Room for improvement & advancement

  5. My two cents… • The site visit team is there to verify info from the self-study • They should not be “out to get you” like a detective pursuing Americas most wanted • They can even assist you sometimes, so don’t miss the opportunity to utilize the visit team to help the program

  6. With that thought in mind…. • Lets put on our site visitor hats! • The following scenarios should be discussed at each table • Determine if non-compliances are present • Explain why or why not?

  7. Scenario 1

  8. Scenario 1

  9. Scenario 2

  10. Scenario 2

  11. Scenario 3

  12. Scenario 3

  13. Scenario 4

  14. Scenario 4

  15. Scenario 5

  16. Scenario 5

  17. Scenario 6

  18. Scenario 6

  19. Scenario 7

  20. Scenario 7

  21. Scenario 8

  22. Scenario 8

More Related