430 likes | 570 Vues
The Public Charter School Grant Program Workshop. California Charter Schools Conference February 27, 2012. Presented by: California Department of Education Charter Schools Division. Objective.
E N D
The Public Charter School Grant Program Workshop California Charter Schools ConferenceFebruary 27, 2012 Presented by: California Department of Education Charter Schools Division
Objective Develop/Increase Understanding of the Public Charter Schools Grant Program (PCSGP) Work Plan and Scoring Process.
PCSGP Grant • Supplements funding for new charter schools to build capacity to become high-quality sustainable schools. • Available for up to 36 months: • Planning Year • Two Implementation Years
High Quality Charter School • Meets or exceeds academic goals • Has sound governance • Is administered effectively • Has sound fiscal management • Is financially viable • Has effective teachers • Keeps its students • Elicits parent, student, staff, and community support
Work Plan Applicants must complete a Work Plan that includes capacity-building activities designed to enable the school to achieve the performance objectives in the school’s charter.
Capacity Building Activities • Correlated with the school’s charter • Designed to: • Build long-term sustainability • Be aligned with school’s academic achievement goals
Capacity Building Activities (cont.) • Governance Training (1A) • Fiscal Management Training (1B) • Development of Teacher Effectiveness Measures (1C) • Meeting and Exceeding Academic Progress Goals (2A) • Student Retention (2B) • Graduation Rate (high schools only) (2C)
Meeting and Exceeding Academic Progress Goals Prompt 2A • Includes four sub-prompts: • Providing professional development/teacher training • Using data to • Inform instruction • Evaluate programs • Evaluate professional staff • Engaging all students through varied instructional strategies • Using formative and summative assessments to improve instruction • Each sub-prompt must be developed fully
Work Plan Requirements Responses to prompts and sub-prompts should: • Reflect the school’s charter • Be developed by stakeholders • Include at least one objective • Include the full grant period
Work Plan Requirements (cont.) Each Work Plan objective should be followed by concrete activities that: • Include sufficient detail to monitor implementation • Are organized sequentially • Begin with action verbs • Capture the full scope of the work needed to meet the objective
Work Plan Requirements (cont.) • Each activity must include: • A specific timeline for completion • The person responsible for ensuring completion of the activity • The amount budgeted from the PCSGP grant for the activity
Timeline for Completion • Must include • A planned start and end date: October 1—December 15, 2012 • Weekly from September 15, 2012, to June 8, 2013 • August 20 – 31, 2012, and August 19 – 30, 2013 • All years of grant
Timeline for Completion (cont.) • Unacceptable timelines include: • “Ongoing” • Multi-year time spans (fall 2012 to spring 2013)
Person Responsible One individual should be responsible for each activity. This person is accountable for ensuring that the activity is completed. Example: Principal or Director
Amounts Budgeted for Activities • Evince what the school expects to spend for each activity • Link easily to CA Account Codes • Have first year costs easily identifiable in the first year Budget Report • Account for a majority of grant funds • Include all years of the grant
Cost Breakout for Activity Example: $2,430 • Consultant fees: 2 contractors @ $150 per hour X 8 hours (including two hours or preparation time = $2,400 • Materials: 25 pages X 24 copies X .05 per page = $30 • Teacher stipends = $0 part of regular contract time
Narrative Outline • Objective 1: • Activity 1: • Timeline: • Person Responsible: • Budget Cost: • Activity 2: • Timeline: • Person Responsible: • Budget Cost: • Objective 2
Narrative Outline • Objective 1: • Activity 1: • Timeline: • Person Responsible: • Budget Cost: • Activity 2: • Timeline: • Person Responsible: • Budget Cost: • Objective 2
Example of Completed Narrative Response Area: 2A–Use of Data (b) Objective 1: The school will develop and fully implement an assessment and monitoring system to track student mastery of key standards and appropriately modify instruction to improve student achievement.
Example (Cont.) Activity 1: Adopt user-friendly and easily accessible data management system. Timeline: By 6/1/2012 Person Responsible: Principal PCSGP $ Budgeted: $2,500 for office computer and printer, $10,000 for laptops with data management software for 8 teachers, $5,000 for data management software, $5,000 for consultant to set up system = $22,500 (100% of cost) in Planning Year
Example (Cont.) Activity 2: Establish explicit expectations and policies for the regular and uniform administration and analysis of common benchmark assessments. Timeline: By 6/30/2012 Person Responsible: Principal PCSGP $ Budgeted: $5,000 (5% of salary) in Planning Year.
Example (Cont.) Activity 3: Assign data administrator to maintain and update data system. Timeline: By 7/27/12 Person Responsible: Principal PCSGP $ Budgeted: $33,000 in Implementation Year 1(30 percent of salary of hired staff).
Example (Cont.) Activity 4: Develop common benchmark assessments at each grade level based on state standards. Timeline: 8/1/12–10/31/12 Person Responsible: Principal (to assign lead teacher at each grade level) PCSGP $ Budgeted: $32,000 in Implementation Year 1(20% salary X 8 teachers X .25)
Example (Cont.) Activity 5: Train all staff on adopted system, including the accurate entry and retrieval of data and the generation of data reports Timeline: 10/1/12 Person Responsible: Data Admin. PCSGP $ Budgeted: None
Example (Cont.) Activity 6: Train all staff on how to analyze assessment data and effectively apply data to modify classroom instruction and target student needs. Timeline: 11/5/12 Person Responsible: Principal PCSGP $ Budgeted: None
Example (Cont.) Activity 7: Establish common cut points for proficiency levels tied to the state performance levels. Timeline: By 11/15/12 Person Responsible: Principal (working with teacher leads) PCSGP $Budgeted: $8,000 in Implementation Year 1(teacher stipends for 16 hours after school).
Example (Cont.) Activity 8: Develop calendar for administering assessments (at six-week intervals). Timeline: By 11/15/12 Person Responsible: Principal (working with lead teachers) PCSGP $ Budgeted: None
Example (Cont.) Activity 9: Monitor that assessments are administered according to timetable. Timeline: To begin 12/1/12 Person Responsible: Principal and Data Administrator PCSGP $ Budgeted: None (ongoing activity and therefore not allowable cost under grant)
Example (Cont.) Activity 10: Schedule one period per six weeks for teachers to convene by grade level and examine student assessment data and strategies to increase learning. Timeline: To begin 1/15/13 and occurring every six weeks Person Responsible: Principal PCSGP $Budgeted: None (Teachers meet during regular school day).
Grant Screening and Scoring Handouts: • Rubric for Scoring the Public Charter Schools Grant Program Work Plan • Sample Budget Form
Work Plan Budgeted Costs • The Work Plan is reviewed to determine if the budgeted costs: • Are allowable, • Account for a majority of the grant funds requested, and • Include the complete grant period.
Work Plan Scoring • A score of 1–4 is assigned to each prompt and sub-prompt within the Work Plan. • A score of 1 or 2 in any prompt or sub-prompt results in denial of the application.
Scoring Rubric 4 points: Excellent. There are major strengths contained in the response to the criteria. 3 points: Good. Strengths outweigh weaknesses. 2 points: Fair. Some important weaknesses. 1 point: Inadequate/Unsatisfactory. Major weaknesses outweigh any strengths.
Budget Report #1 Budget Report #1 is reviewed to determine if it includes all: • Work Plan costs for the first year and • Grant funds requested for the first year.
Sample Budget Section • FY 2011 Quarter 3 • Expenditure ($): 25,000 • Description (2,000 Characters or Less): Director’s salary (100% of salary) to attend CCSA conference, meet with authorizer, plan and conduct parent meetings, interview and hire staff, prepare draft handbook, work with office manager on opening procedures
Quarterly Benchmark Reports (QBRs) • Grantees • Submit four reports: • January 15 (October–December) • April 15 (January–March) • July 15 (April–June) • October 15 (July–September) • Provide an update on implementation of Work Plan activities during the quarter by: • Describing all PCSGP expenditures • Reporting all PCSGP expenditures • Uploading documentation for all expenditures • CDE uses reports to verify appropriate use of funds and compliance with grant requirements
Work Plan Documentation Documentation of Work Plan activities may include: • Personnel Activity Reports • Invoices for equipment and materials • Consultant invoices or contracts • Expense reports with receipts • Certificates of Completion • Conference registration receipts • Letters from facilitators or board members to confirm training took place
Comprehensive Phase Report Grantees annually update the Work Plan in the Comprehensive Phase Report by describing the: • Progress of activities completed towards meeting the Work Plan objectives. • Relevance of expenditures toward meeting the Work Plan objectives.
Budget Report #2 Repeats the steps for Budget Report #1 looking at the Work Plan activities for the second year of grant funding.
Resources • Webcasts on the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/cs/as/pcsgp2010.asp • PCSGP Request for Applications http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/fo/r1/pcsgp11rfa.asp