1 / 15

STRENGTH BASED LEADERSHIP GALLUP ®

STRENGTH BASED LEADERSHIP GALLUP ®. Executive Leadership Resources, Inc Ray Watson Jim Downing . PRESENTATION OBJECTIVE. “TO SHOW THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COMPANY PROFITABILITY AND ENGAGED EMPLOYEES”. NOTABLE QUOTE.

holli
Télécharger la présentation

STRENGTH BASED LEADERSHIP GALLUP ®

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. STRENGTH BASED LEADERSHIPGALLUP® Executive Leadership Resources, Inc Ray Watson Jim Downing

  2. PRESENTATION OBJECTIVE • “TO SHOW THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COMPANY PROFITABILITY AND ENGAGED EMPLOYEES”

  3. NOTABLE QUOTE • “NO COMPANY CONSISTENLY GREW REVENUES FASTER THAN ITS ABILITY TO GET ENOUGH OF THE RIGHT PEOPLE TO IMPLEMENT THAT GROWTH” • DAVID PACKARD

  4. EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT LEVELS • GALLUP MEASURED THE WORK-UNIT-LEVEL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMPLOEE ENGAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES THAT THE ORGANZIATION SUPPLIED. (50,000 WORK UNITS – 1.4 MILLION EMPLOYEES SURVEYED EVERY 3-4 YEARS) • ENGAGED EMPLOYEE = 30% IN U.S. (Varies based on type of enterprise) • (Work with passion and feel a profound connection to their company) • NOT ENGAGED = 50% • (Employees are “checked out, putting in time, no passion in their work) • ACTIVELY DISENGAGED = 20% • (Not just unhappy with work, but act out their unhappiness, bad apples)

  5. Engaged vs. disengaged • COOPERS FINDINGS: • IF MANAGER FOCUSES ON WEAKNESSES = 22% DISENGAGMENT • IF MANAGER FOCUES ON STRENGTHS = 1% DISENGAGEMENT • IF MANAGER IGNORES = 40% DISENGAGEMENT

  6. RECOGNITION • 63% INCREASE IN PRODUCTIVITY • 61% INCREASE IN ENGAGEMENT LEVELS • 51% INCREASE IN RETENTION

  7. SO WHAT?

  8. 34 talents (strengths)

  9. The Four Domains of Leadership Strength

  10. Composite Example based on ELRI Experience

  11. FINDINGS

  12. Management Team Profile

  13. PROCESS • ADMINISTER EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY (ANONYMOUSLY) • HAVE ALL MANGERS TAKE STRENGTHSFINDERS FOR TOP 5 ($9.99) • ELRI CAN PROVIDE FIRST LEVEL REPORT ON FINDINGS • HAVE ALL EMPLOYEES TAKE TOP 5 ASSESSEMENT • HAVE ALL MANAGERS TAKE 34 STRENGTHS ASSESSMENT ($89.00) • CONDUCT ONE TO ONE INTERVIEWS WITH ALL MANGERS • CONDUCT 4 HOUR SESSION WITH MANAGERS AND LEADERSHIP TEAM • IDENTIFY GOALS BASED ON FINDINGS • CONDUCT QUARTERLY 4 HR SESSIONS WITH MANAGERS AND LEADERSHIP TEAM TO DONTINUE FOCUS ON STRENGTHS

  14. references • “FIRST BREAK ALL THE RULES” BY MARCUS BUCKINGHAM • “HUMAN SIGMA” BY JOHN H. FLEMING AND JIM ASPLUND • “STRENGTHSFINDER 2.0” BY TOM RATH • “STRENGTHS BASED LEADERSHIP” BY TIME RATH AND BARRY CONCHIE • “THE COMING JOB WARS” BY JIM CLIFTON • “SMART MOVES” BY JOHN THEDFORD • WWW.GALLUPSTRENGTHSCENTER.COM • WWW.EXECLEADERSHIPRESOURCES.COM • RAY: 407-908-9920 (SIGNIFICANCE, RELATOR, ACHEIVER, SELF ASSURANCE, ACTIVATIOR) • JIM: 407-247-3954 (STRATEGIC, INTELLECTION, INPUT, LEARNER, RELATOR)

More Related