1 / 26

Retinex Theory

Retinex Theory. Psych221 Final Project Mike Jahr March 16, 2000. Color Constancy. Color depends on wavelength But, objects reflect different wavelengths under different lighting conditions. Banana in daylight, fluorescent light, no light... To us, they seem to retain their color.

holly
Télécharger la présentation

Retinex Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Retinex Theory Psych221 Final Project Mike Jahr March 16, 2000

  2. Color Constancy • Color depends on wavelength • But, objects reflect different wavelengths under different lighting conditions. • Banana in daylight, fluorescent light, no light... • To us, they seem to retain their color.

  3. How is this possible? • There is more to color than wavelength. • The visual system must somehow “discount the illuminant”

  4. A Juicy Burger

  5. A Closer Look...

  6. What’s going on? • It’s not very saturated, but the red burger has browns, greens, tans… • How can we see these colors in only red and white light?

  7. Enter Edwin H. Land • Land was the founder of Polaroid; interested in color • While running Maxwell’s experiments (3 color projectors), he noticed this • It spawned decades of experiments

  8. The Mondrian Apparatus • Land set up 3 filtered light sources (LMS) • Can calibrate each one;precisely control light • Telescopic photometer Actually closer to a Van Doesburg...

  9. Mondrian Experiments • Measure reflectance from a green patch • Calibrate lights so that a blue patch reflects an identical spectrum • It still looks blue!

  10. More Mondrian • Calibrate lights for even reflectance from the green patch • Cover all other patches; looks gray • Uncover all patches; looks green

  11. Land’s Conclusions • Perceived color depends on reflected spectrum, but also on surroundings • Relative reflectance is more important than absolute reflectance

  12. Discount the Illuminant: Retinex • “A framework for computing perceived colors on the basis of the relative intensities of three wavelengths and their spectral interactions.” • Processed in retina or cortex? Retinex!

  13. Principles of Retinex • Process each receptor class independently • Objective is to calculate illuminant-independent “lightness” values • Lightness values represent perceived color

  14. The Algorithm • Pick a starting pixel x1, then form a path by randomly selecting neighboring pixels • Update an accumulator at each pixel: • Threshold step: if difference is small, use previous sensor response

  15. The Algorithm II • Keep a counter N(x) for each pixel • After a number of paths, normalize A(x) by N(x) for each pixel • Result is L(x), the lightness value • Algorithm has two parameters: • number of paths, length of each path

  16. What is Lightness? • Should not depend on viewing conditions • Should only depend on surface properties • Results in a triplet that is tough to interpret • The retinex color space • Issue: what to do with it?

  17. My Implementation 1 Convert image from RGB to LMS via phosphor spectra and cone sensitivities 2 Run algorithm to get lightness values 3 Do something with lightness values?? • B&W implementation

  18. Retinex Variants • McCann et al. • Retinex with reset • Horn • Determining lightness from an image • Marini • Retinex with Brownian motion

  19. Illusions under Retinex Original image Processed image

  20. More Illusions Original image Retinex image

  21. Biological Basis • Some monkey neurons respond to colors, not wavelengths • Cortical area V4 in prestriate cortex • Even goldfish can discount the illuminant

  22. Problems with Retinex • Too dependent on composition of surfaces in image • Higher-order processes influence color

  23. Conclusion • Retinex is a long-lived theory, has sparked much debate and many imitators • Although not a generally accurate model of human vision, it does perform well in some situations

  24. Appendix • Source files, sample images, sample output, etc. can be found in src/ along with brief explanations of each.

  25. References • E. H. Land, “Recent advances in retinex theory and some implications for cortical applications: Color vision and the natural image,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 5163–5169 (1983). • E. H. Land, “Recent advances in retinex theory,” Vision Res. 26, 7–22 (1986). • B. K. P. Horn, “Determining lightness from an image,” Comp. Graphics Image Process. 3, 277–299 (1974). • D. H. Brainard and B. A. Wandell, “Analysis of the retinex theory of color vision,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 3, 1651–1661 (1986). • J. J. McCann, “Lessons learned from Mondrians applied to real images and color gamuts,” IS&T Rep. 14, 6 (1999). http://www.imaging.org/pubs/reporter/articles/14_6_mccann/index.html

  26. References • E. H. Adelsen, “Lightness perception and lightness illusions,” in M. Gazzaniga, M.S., Ed., The Cognitive Neurosciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 339-351 (1999). http://www-bcs.mit.edu/people/adelson/publications/gazzan.dir/gazzan.htm • F.W. Campbell, F.R.S., “Dr. Edwin H. Land,” Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 40, 195-219 (1994). http://www.rowland.org/land/land.html • D. Marini and L. Marini, “Measuring the colours we receive,” Science Tribune, October (1997). http://www.tribunes.com/tribune/art97/mari.htm

More Related