1 / 24

STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS FOR CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SAMASPUR BIRD SANCTUARY,UTTAR PRADESH.

STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS FOR CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SAMASPUR BIRD SANCTUARY,UTTAR PRADESH. Chinmay N. Korgaonkar,IIFM. Yogesh Gokhale,TERI. Agenda. Introduction to Samaspur Bird Sanctuary. Introduction to the Project by TERI. Stakeholders Analysis. Samaspur Bird Sanctuary.

honora
Télécharger la présentation

STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS FOR CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SAMASPUR BIRD SANCTUARY,UTTAR PRADESH.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS FOR CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SAMASPUR BIRD SANCTUARY,UTTAR PRADESH. Chinmay N. Korgaonkar,IIFM. Yogesh Gokhale,TERI. LAKE 2006.

  2. Agenda • Introduction to Samaspur Bird Sanctuary. • Introduction to the Project by TERI. • Stakeholders Analysis. LAKE 2006.

  3. Samaspur Bird Sanctuary. LAKE 2006.

  4. Introduction to the Project by TERI. • Detailed documentation of flora and fauna. • Resource utilization by migratory waterfowl. • Wetland use by the local communities. • Developing a sound management strategy. LAKE 2006.

  5. Stakeholders Analysis. • Socio-Economic characteristics of wetland users. • Use of Samaspur wetlands. • Migratory Waterfowl. • Problems in conservation efforts for the wetlands. • Possible measures. LAKE 2006.

  6. Methodology. • Transect boat rides in the lakes with forest department staff. • Transect walks with villagers around the lakes. • Informal interactions with individuals. • FGDs in the surrounding villagers. • Interactions with Pradhans of Gram Sabhas in surrounding villages. • Formal interactions with officials of forest department, irrigation department and local media. LAKE 2006.

  7. Stakeholders in the context of conservation of Samaspur wetlands. • Migratory Waterfowl. • Forest Department. • Local Communities. • Irrigation Department. • Local Media. LAKE 2006.

  8. Socio-economic characteristics of wetland users. • Means of Livelihoods. • Literacy. • Electricity. • Medical Facilities • Drinking Water LAKE 2006.

  9. Use of Samaspur wetlands. • Agriculture. • Grazing. • Fishing. • Ground water recharge. • Other uses. LAKE 2006.

  10. Migratory Waterfowl. • Invasion of Echhiornia crassipes. Harmful Effects. • Competition with other aquatic life. • Pollution of water. • Effect on visiting birds. • Threat to the local cattle. • Drainage of water. LAKE 2006.

  11. Migratory Waterfowl • Poaching of visiting birds. • Submergence of agricultural land around the lakes LAKE 2006.

  12. Submergence of agricultural land around the lakes Linkage between the submergence of land and arrival of migratory birds • Availability of shallow water • Left over grains in the fields • Lack of livelihood options. If issue of submergence is solved • Availability of livelihood options • Reduction in vulnerability to the poaching. • Monitoring of lake. • Addition to diversity of fishes in lakes. LAKE 2006.

  13. Problems in the conservation efforts for the wetlands. • Inadequate staff strength at the sanctuary. • Management of Bissaiya Lake. • Non-existence of an efficient local NGO. • Lack of research facilities at the sanctuary. • Conflicts between the local communities and the forest department LAKE 2006.

  14. Conclusions. • Efforts to solve the issue submergence of land • Additional budgetary and staff allocation for the forest department at the sanctuary • Efforts to stop the spread of Water Hyacinth in the lakes. • Continuation and expansion of initiatives like EDCs and health camps • Non-existence of efficient NGOs • Establishment of research facilities at the sanctuary LAKE 2006.

  15. THANK YOU!!Questions please…. LAKE 2006.

  16. Invasion of Water Hyacinth. LAKE 2006.

  17. Bakulai Drain. Condition of Bakulai Drain. LAKE 2006.

  18. Map of Sanctuary. LAKE 2006.

  19. Sharda Canal. LAKE 2006.

  20. Patrolling by Forest Department. LAKE 2006.

  21. Girl carrying luke grass. LAKE 2006.

  22. Location of sanctuary. LAKE 2006.

  23. Agriculture practiced inside the sanctuary. LAKE 2006.

  24. Interaction with villagers. LAKE 2006.

More Related