70 likes | 207 Vues
The annual review outlines key performance indicators that highlight faculty and student satisfaction, peer-reviewed publications, and graduate outcomes. Notable increases in faculty satisfaction from 63% to 73% and stable student satisfaction at 92% reflect positive trends. However, a decline in graduates entering further education (14% from 18%) warrants attention. Key indicators to monitor include faculty attrition rates, nationally awarded faculty, and extramural grant support. Discussions will focus on meeting objectives and aligning with university goals for 2010.
E N D
Accountability Example of text from actual annual review of a department administrator: “... the SCCP Key Performance indicators that will be important to parts of your performance review are: • Faculty satisfaction (increased from 63% in 2008 to 73% in 2009) • Student satisfaction (increased from 91% to 92%) • Number of peer reviewed publications (29 for calendar 2008) For your submitted performance goals) I recommend that you add: • Number (%) of graduates going into residencies, fellowships, or grad school. This declined this year to 14% from 18% the prior two years. Other important indicators noted in last years review were: • Faculty attrition rate • Number of nationally awarded faculty • Extramural grant support”
Weighing the important stuffdifferent things deserve different scales
Goals Challenges Determination DJ's Journey
Breakout Sessions
Pillar Goals 2009/2010
Breakout Objectives • Discuss the 2009 Pillars met or exceeded • Identify Pillars not met in 2009 • Review 2010 University Pillars and begin drafting College/Unit Pillars for 2010 (to be due Oct 30th) • Discuss how you will communicate new Pillar Goals to all Return @ 2:00 to debrief