1 / 31

Science Curriculum Review Team

Science Curriculum Review Team. April 11, 2011. Agenda. Introductions (those new to the group) Science Data Part II Review/analyze the audit report Begin to draft recommendations for Board

iden
Télécharger la présentation

Science Curriculum Review Team

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Science Curriculum Review Team April 11, 2011

  2. Agenda • Introductions (those new to the group) • Science Data Part II • Review/analyze the audit report • Begin to draft recommendations for Board • Homework: Submit additional recommendations for consideration by the group. Bring these to our 4/26 meeting.

  3. Introductions If you are new to the group, please be ready to share your: • Name • Connection to Oakwood (teacher, parent, alumnus, etc.) • If your work/career is related to a STEM (science-technology-engineering-math) field, please explain. • A science-related book, movie, TV show, experience, field trip, etc. that influenced your feelings about science.

  4. Group’s Purpose & Composition • Purpose: To utilize the review process to strengthen Oakwood’s K-12 science programming. • Provide input • Propose ideas • Serve as watchdog/accountability check • Involve stakeholders • Composition: K-12 science teachers, administrators, content experts, and parents and community members.

  5. Group’s Scope of Work • Review the K-12 science audit report commissioned by Oakwood and conducted by an outside Audit Panel of content experts (university professors). The audit evaluated Oakwood's current K-12 science program and identified strengths and suggestions for growth. • Review Oakwood's science data (ITBS, OAA, OGT, AP, ACT, etc.). • Consider recommendations for changes from internal and external stakeholders. • Make recommendations for changes to the Board of Education.

  6. Science Data • Part I (last meeting) • Ohio Achievement Tests • Ohio Graduation Tests • Part II (today) • ACT • Iowa Test of Basic Skills • Advanced Placement exams • College Connection Data • Gender Data

  7. ACT Data

  8. ACT Data

  9. ACT Data

  10. ACT Data

  11. ACT Data Percent of ACT-Tested Students Ready for College-Level Coursework

  12. ACT Data

  13. Advanced Placement Data

  14. AP Data (2009)

  15. AP Data: Biology

  16. AP Data: Chemistry

  17. AP Data: Physics

  18. Iowa Test of Basic Skills Data Fall, 2010

  19. Iowa Test of Basic Skills Data

  20. College Connection Data* * Data from 2005-2007 (2005: Miami; 2006: OSU; 2007: UD)

  21. College Connection Data* * Data from 2008-2010 (2008: OU; 2009: WSU; 2010: Denison)

  22. College Connection Data* • Qualitative data regarding science preparation: • Astro easy with physics background (D) • Good teachers (D) • AP bio helped a lot (D) • The science department teachers approached students exactly the same as the college professors do. (W) • Bio training under tough--but--fair Teacher’s Name left me ready for the biology trilogy. (W) • Everything we learned in my…science classes I have learned about from my time at Oakwood. (W) • I had trouble in this when I was there, classes run with the most advanced rather than slower. (O) • Awesome, our program at Oakwood was very helpful. • I’m not good at science, but I did okay in nutrition because I studied a lot. • I took Chem 121. I got an “A” in the course. Chem made more sense the 2nd time I took it. * Data from 2008-2010 (2008: OU; 2009: WSU; 2010: Denison)

  23. Data by Gender: OAA & OGT

  24. Data by Gender: PLTW

  25. Data by Gender: AP Courses

  26. Data by Subgroup: OAA & OGT (2010)

  27. Audit Process • Purpose: To have an external panel identify strengths and areas of growth in the Oakwood K-12 Science program. • Audit Team: • Al Fratini, UD • Bob Kearns, UD • Carl Friese, UD • Elizabeth George, Wittenberg • Lalitha Locker, Sinclair • Douglas Bradley-Hutchison, Sinclair • Lisa Kenyon, WSU (ex officio) • Data: • Grade level/course artifacts • Teacher survey • Classroom observations and informal mini-interviews of teachers • Report will be sent to team members and posted on our website.

  28. Audit Report • With your group, identify: • Key findings • Strengths • Areas for growth • Recommendations to consider making to the Board • Questions that remain • Capture your ideas on chart paper • Be ready to share with the whole group

  29. Homework • What recommendations do you have for improvements to our K-12 science programming that have not been considered? • You will receive via email sometime this week a template to use to document your recommendations. • The Curriculum Review Team will review these recommendations at our next meeting.

  30. Next Steps • April 26, 2011 • Review recommendations submitted for consideration • Finalize recommendations to the Board • Identify next steps/timeline for working groups (teacher/admin members of the Science Curriculum Review Team).

  31. Questions?

More Related