1 / 36

Field quality in correctors: Episode III

MEL. Field quality in correctors: Episode III. Update on warm magnetic measurements of lattice correctors V. Remondino. FQWG 3/5 2005, V. Remondino AT/MEL. MEL. Introduction. As only lattice correctors are concerned, we do not consider MCDOs & MCSs (~3700 magnets)

illana-christensen
Télécharger la présentation

Field quality in correctors: Episode III

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MEL Field quality in correctors: Episode III Update on warm magnetic measurements of lattice correctors V. Remondino FQWG 3/5 2005, V. Remondino AT/MEL

  2. MEL Introduction • As only lattice correctors are concerned, we do not consider MCDOs & MCSs (~3700 magnets) • Reminder: we measure modules and not the final correctors • Only data stored in MTF (Oracle WMM table ) are taken into account (no preliminary data from modules approval) • We concentrate mainly on the dispersion of the Transfer Functions for the SSS correctors

  3. MOs: Transfer Function 289 modules analyzed

  4. MOs: Transfer Function

  5. MOs: Transfer Function  = 0.27 %

  6. MOs: Histograms (phase & alignment)

  7. MOs: Normal Harmonics

  8. MOs: B1 Modules in Fast-Track included

  9. MOs: Normal Harmonics MOs:

  10. MOs: Skew Harmonics

  11. MOs: Skew Harmonics

  12. MOs: Summary

  13. MSMs: Transfer Function 441 modules analyzed

  14. MSMs: Transfer Function 441 modules analyzed  = 0.33 %

  15. MSMs: Histograms (phase & alignment)

  16. MSMs: Normal Harmonics

  17. MSMs: Normal Harmonics

  18. MSMs: Skew Harmonics

  19. MSMs: Skew Harmonics

  20. MSMs: Summary

  21. MQTs: Transfer Function 88 modules analyzed

  22. MQTs: Transfer Function  = 0.23 %

  23. MQTs: Histograms (phase & alignment)

  24. MQTs: Normal Harmonics

  25. MQTs: Normal Harmonics

  26. MQTs: Skew Harmonics

  27. MQTs: Summary

  28. MCBMs: Transfer function 397 correctors analyzed

  29. MCBMs: Transfer function 397 modules analyzed  = 0.33 %

  30. MCBMs: Normal harmonics

  31. MCBMs: Skew harmonics

  32. MCBMs: Summary

  33. Conclusions - modulus • The measured systematic of the modulus is often out of the limits scaled at low current (but this is not a problem) • The measured sigma on the modulus is < 0.33 % for all correctors: this satisfies the specifications, with the exception of MCBMs, for which a  of 0.02 % was specified

  34. Conclusions - Phase • The phase is not a issue as it can be easily corrected modifying the ‘keys’

  35. Conclusions : Alignment • During the construction, modules are aligned with particular care. Measurements show that we are within tolerances. • At the beginning of the production, MQTs were out of specs. Now the situation is under control.

  36. Conclusions: Harmonics • Recently, we observed a jump in the trend of the low harmonics (b1, b2, a1, a2 too high) in MOs. • The coil manufacturing process has been modified in order to solve this problem. Measurements on last modules show that harmonics are back to usual values. • Part of this ‘bad’ production has been rejected or is in stand-by. However, we decided to accept most of the modules after discussion with A. Lombardi.

More Related