1 / 16

Cross-cutting Concepts and Scientific & Engineering Practices in Oregon Classrooms

Cross-cutting Concepts and Scientific & Engineering Practices in Oregon Classrooms. Bruce Schafer Phone: 503-725-2915 Email: bruce_schafer@ous.edu February 2014. Advisory & Review Panel. Engineering Design in Oregon Science Classrooms EDOSC

iniko
Télécharger la présentation

Cross-cutting Concepts and Scientific & Engineering Practices in Oregon Classrooms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cross-cutting Concepts and Scientific & Engineering Practices in Oregon Classrooms Bruce Schafer Phone: 503-725-2915 Email: bruce_schafer@ous.edu February 2014

  2. Advisory & Review Panel Engineering Design in Oregon Science Classrooms EDOSC Original Purpose: Help Oregon Teachers use engineering design to teach science Computational Thinking • Major Milestones • Tested with ES, MS, & HS Teachers in February 2013 • Train-the-Facilitator Workshop in June 2013 for 8 School Districts

  3. EDOSC Overview • Supports current Oregon Science Standards • Uses most of the Engineering Practices embodied in NGSS • Teacher’s Guides • Elementary School • Middle School • High School • Sample Lessons • Lesson Plans • Readings • Vocabulary • Exploration Activity • Design Activity • Workshops • For trainer/facilitators – 4 days – 1 to 3 people per grantee • For teachers – 2 ½ days – grade-band specific • http://opas.ous.edu/EDOSC/Materials.php Computational Thinking

  4. EDOSC Lessons Computational Thinking

  5. Questions? Computational Thinking

  6. Planning for NGSS • Translating cross-cutting concepts into cognitive skills • Using scientific and engineering practices to enhance learning • Lessons • Leverage and improve EDOSC lessons • Creating new lessons • Lesson clearinghouse • Issues: Timing, budget Computational Thinking

  7. Intervention Model 0. Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. 1. Ref. Hestenes; Halloun; Sibley; Gotzer and Perkins 2. Tied to CCSS English Language Arts. 3. Ref. Kuhn, et al; Aufschnaiter, et al; Also Michaels et al. (2008) re: Accountable Talk 4. Tied to NGSS practices: pedagogically-effective progressions based on subsets of professional practices.

  8. High Impact Classrooms

  9. 1. Asking questions (for science) and defining problems (for engineering) * From NGSS Appendix F

  10. 2. Developing and using models * From NGSS Appendix F

  11. 3. Planning and Carrying Out Investigations * From NGSS Appendix F

  12. Planning for NGSS • Translating cross-cutting concepts into cognitive skills • Using scientific and engineering practices to enhance learning • Lessons • Leverage and improve EDOSC lessons • Creating new lessons • Lesson clearinghouse • Issues: Timing, budget Computational Thinking

  13. Discussion Computational Thinking

More Related