1 / 12

Presented by Sarah S. Flournoy , J.D., Ed.D . Of Counsel, West & Associates, LLP

Placement Decisions and Least Restrictive Environment Special Education Laws Made Simple November 2013 – Austin, Texas National Business Institute. Presented by Sarah S. Flournoy , J.D., Ed.D . Of Counsel, West & Associates, LLP. FAPE. Free and Appropriate Public Education

ishana
Télécharger la présentation

Presented by Sarah S. Flournoy , J.D., Ed.D . Of Counsel, West & Associates, LLP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Placement Decisions andLeast Restrictive EnvironmentSpecial Education Laws Made SimpleNovember 2013 – Austin, Texas National Business Institute Presented by Sarah S. Flournoy, J.D., Ed.D. Of Counsel, West & Associates, LLP

  2. FAPE • Free and Appropriate Public Education • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act • Qualify for federal funds • Constitutional right • Not the same education for all students • Definition intentionally flexible and broad

  3. LRE, Mainstreaming and Inclusion • With nondisabled peers to maximum extent • Deviation if “nature or severity” of disability prevent education in general classroom • Preference referred to as mainstreaming or inclusion

  4. Continuum of Alternative Placements

  5. Placement Decision Requirements • Part of IEP • Determined by ARD Committee • Start at left and work to the right as necessary • Little different for visually and auditory

  6. Factors That Can and Cannot be Considered • Consider • Potential harmful effect • Quality of services • Impact on attainment of goals • Not Consider • Necessity of modifying general curriculum • Disability (as opposed to impact of disability)

  7. Predetermining Placement • Do not do! • Usurps ARD committee • Not individualized • Parents prevented from participating

  8. Private Schools • Two scenarios • Parents voluntarily place there • LEA cannot provide services necessary to ensure FAPE • LEA responsible for • Locating • Providing services to • tracking

  9. Private Schools • Two Part Test • School district’s placement pursuant to IEP inappropriate; and, • Private placement desired by parents appropriate. • LEA FAPE does not need to exceed private school to be adequate

  10. Change in PlacementProcedures • By ARD committee as part of IEP • Parents may request ARD mtg to discuss • 10 or more cumulative days • TEA Methods to Resolve Disputes • TEA Investigation • Mediation • Due Process Hearing

  11. Change in PlacementReview of Placement Decisions & “Stay-Put” • Reviewed • At least annually • Disciplinary issues may force earlier review • Student “stay-put” while placement is being reviewed • Gave rise to dangerousness exclusion • SC in 1988 • No such exclusion where manifestation of disability • 10 day cooling off period okay • 1997 Amendments to IDEA • Only 3 reasons why student can be unilaterally moved

  12. Questions? Sarah S. Flournoy, J.D., Ed.D. Of Counsel, West & Associates, LLP 320 South R. L. Thornton Frwy, Suite 300 Dallas, Texas 75203 Sarah.f@westllp.com 214.941.1881

More Related