1 / 10

Chad Hrdina, MS, EMT, GC-WMD Chief, Medical Countermeasure Utilization and Response Integration

Division of Medical Countermeasure Strategy and Requirements. Mass Casualty Emergency Medical Response to a Nuclear Detonation: Utilization of Oxygen Transporters. Chad Hrdina, MS, EMT, GC-WMD Chief, Medical Countermeasure Utilization and Response Integration

issac
Télécharger la présentation

Chad Hrdina, MS, EMT, GC-WMD Chief, Medical Countermeasure Utilization and Response Integration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Division of Medical Countermeasure Strategy and Requirements Mass Casualty Emergency Medical Response to a Nuclear Detonation:Utilization of Oxygen Transporters Chad Hrdina, MS, EMT, GC-WMD Chief, Medical Countermeasure Utilization and Response Integration Given at Oxygen Carrier State of the Science Meeting Fort Detrick, MD 6 February 2017

  2. Bottom line up front • Following a nuclear detonation there will be hundreds of thousands of casualties that could benefit from intervention with oxygen transporters. With efficient response to a mass casualty incident, and early application of hemostats, many lives can be saved with oxygen transporters later in the care paradigm.

  3. Nuclear detonationresponse considerations • Nuclear detonation will result in • Infrastructure damage (response will require flexibility and adaptability) • Complex spectrum of injuries (treatment will require polypharmacy approaches) • Radiation exposure • Mechanical trauma: blunt force, fractures, lacerations, penetrations • Thermal burns • Combined injuries of acute radiation exposure, • Spectrum of injuries changes with different scenarios • Resource limitations • Medical management will require complex coordination

  4. Potential casualties resulting from a nuclear detonation in a major city 1 injury severity score 2 % total body surface area, partial- and full-thickness burns 3 centigray *Adapted from Knebel, et al., DMPHP (S1), March 2011: http://jnls.cup.org/pdftext.do?componentId=8848885&jid=DMP&freeFlag=OA †http://www.childstats.gov

  5. Nuclear detonation = scarce resources situation • Resource adequacy will vary greatly across the response areas by time and location (local and region, possibly nationally) • Response resources will be overwhelmed by casualty numbers and needs and concerned citizens requesting assistance • Limited access to interventions, (e.g., IV, transfusions, MCMs, conventional care) • To achieve fairness in resource allocation, a common triage approach is important • Possible change from "conventional" to "contingency" or "crisis" standards of care (treating those "most likely to survive" first approach) • Clinical reassessment and repeat triage are critical, as resource scarcity worsens or improves.  • Bottom line: MCMs that provide benefit in lieu of extensive medical interventions (e.g., transfusion therapy) provide greatest effectiveness in response

  6. CONOPS for responseRadiation TRiage, TRansport, TReatment RTR Sites (Field evacuation RTR1 – combined injuries (trauma, burn, radiation) RTR2 – radiation exposure RTR3 – limited injuries AC – assembly centers (screening, initial intervention) MC – medical centers (triage, screening, intervention) 1Hrdina, et al. Prehospital Disaster Medicine, 2009 May-Jun; 24(3); 167-78 2Planning Guidance for Response to a Nuclear Detonation / 2nd Edition / June 2010

  7. CONOPS for response: activities Field stabilization (initial triage) ASPR/PHEMCE objective is to develop a flexible, adaptable, coordinated armamentarium – we must understand the limitations and capabilities of each MCM to help coordinate a cohesive response. Screening/assessment Stabilization / resuscitation some initial definitive care Definitive care

  8. Response: MCM considerations Response timeline (transition of care) Stabilization and Resuscitation field care / ER and early intervention Definitive Care inpatient/outpatient therapy • Activities • Triage and radiation assessment • Decontamination • Biodosimetry if possible • Stabilize mechanical trauma injuries • Initial burn management and covering • Initial hemodynamic stabilization • Pain control • Initiate anti-neutropenic therapy • Control nausea and vomiting • Activities • Provide specialized care • Surgical interventions • Burn debridement and management • Long-term inpatient/outpatient care • Pain control • Biodosimetry • Neutropenia therapy / bone marrow transplant • Transfusion therapy for hemodynamic maintenance and late hemostatic risks Medical countermeasure considerations • Immediate to early access needed • Ease of administration, use, application • Topical, intramuscular, oral, etc. • High therapeutic index required • Poor diagnostics, concerned but healthy casualties • Robust storage, easy deployment • Room temperature, lightweight, pre-formulated, etc. • Delayed access ok timed as patients arrive • Expertise required to administer is ok • Surgical grafting, expert assessment, etc. • Low therapeutic index acceptable • Better diagnostics, expert assessment • Limiting storage requirements may be ok • Frozen, cryopreservation, etc.

  9. Role of oxygen transporters • Hemostats are needed in the field • Must be • Easy to use • Effective • Universal • Oxygen transporters may be used in the emergency room and definitive care settings • Nonspecific products are easily administered without compatibility testing • Oxygen transporters/substrates are more beneficial if they behave somewhat like whole blood: maintain hemodynamic stability • They increase volume • Transport oxygen, carbon dioxide, wastes, etc • Hemostatic (if safe)

  10. Bottom line • Field stabilization will be about • splinting, • hemostasis, and • addressing other medical issues that present impedance of progression through care system • To be most effective, oxygen transporters must be easy to use. • Universal products are easier to use • Easily administered products are preferred • Will be administered in the emergency room and definitive care settings

More Related