1 / 20

2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD. September 9, 2013. Performance Index System. Comprised of 4 Indexes Each Index is scored from 0-100 No single rating as of 2013 Each Index is a separate rating. Additional Information. ELL/LEP

jada
Télécharger la présentation

2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013

  2. Performance Index System • Comprised of 4 Indexes • Each Index is scored from 0-100 • No single rating as of 2013 • Each Index is a separate rating

  3. Additional Information • ELL/LEP • 2013 ELL students are excluded completely if they have been in US schools three years or less. • Retest Results • EOC retest and SSI 1st and 2nd administration results are included in all index calculations.

  4. 2013 Northwest ISD Accountability Rating (Met Standard in All 4 Index Standards)

  5. Index 1 Student Achievement Student performance based on satisfactory student achievement across all subjects for all students Student Group: All Students only Minimum Size Criteria: None Target: • 50 for campuses and districts; • NISD: 87

  6. NISD Student Achievement Table: All NISD Students

  7. Index 2 Student Progress Measure of actual student growth independent of overall achievement levels for race/ethnicity student groups, student with disabilities served by special education, and English Language Learners Subjects: Reading and Mathematics; Writing for available grades Student Groups: 10 which include All students, ELL, Sped, Af. Am. , Am. Ind., Asian, Hispanic, Pac. Isl., White, Two or More Races Minimum Size Criteria: • All Students > 10 • Race/Ethnicity, ELL, Sped > 25

  8. Index 2 Methodology: • For each student group, the % of students at the growth level on the assessment is multiplied by the weight for that growth level – each subject • One point for each % of student at the Met growth level • Two points for each % of students at the Exceeded growth level • Combine all subjects and points for a final index score Target: • High Schools > 17 • Middle Schools > 29 • Elementary Schools > 30 • District > 21 • NISD: 36

  9. Index 3 Closing Performance Gaps Methodology: Each subject contributes points from each student group: • One point for each % of tests that meet Phase-In I Level II Performance and above • Combine all subjects and points for a final index score Target: • Index Score of 55 for campuses and districts • NISD: 82

  10. Index 4 Postsecondary Readiness Purpose is to emphasize the importance for students to receive a high school diploma that provides the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training programs, or the military; and the role of the elementary and middle schools in preparing students for high school.

  11. Index 4 Graduation Score: Combined performance across the graduation rates from either the 4-Year or 5-Year Graduation rate Methodology: 3 Step Process • Determine the number of students who completed High School (graduated) in 4 years (2012): • RHSP/DAP Graduates for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups • Determine the number of students who completed High School (graduated) in 5 years (2011): • RHSP/DAP Graduates for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups • Compare 4 & 5 year graduation rate. Determine which group size is greater. • If a campus does not have a four or five year graduation rate, the high school dropout rate is used instead. • RHSP/DAP Graduates for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups Target: • Index Score of 75 • NISD: 86

  12. 2013 Ratings Criteria • Transition year – Ratings criteria and targets designed to apply to 2013 only. • Rating Labels • Met Standard • Met Alternative Standard • Improvement Required (Did not meet 1 or more index targets) • Not Rated • Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues • Ratings Criteria – Campuses and districts must meet the Accountability Targets in all indexes for which they have performance data to receive a Met Standard. • 24 schools met standard • 1 Improvement Required • Denton Creek is not rated – TJJD Facility

  13. Steele Accelerated High School

  14. 2013 Distinctions Campuses that receive an accountability rating of Met Standard are eligible for the following distinction designations in 2013. • Top 25%: Student Progress • Academic Achievement: Reading/ELA • Academic Achievement: Mathematics

  15. Distinctions Top 25%: Student Progress • Based on performance on Index 2: Student Progress. Campuses that are in the top quartile of their campus comparison group in performance on Index 2 • Campus Comparison Group: 40 campuses across the state that look demographically similar based on: • School Type: Elementary, Middle, High • Numbers of students enrolled • Percentage of English Language Learners • Percentage of economically disadvantaged students • Mobility Rate of students Each campus has a unique group of 40. No two campuses has an identical group.

  16. NISD Schools with Top 25% Student Progress • Hatfield Elementary School • Nance Elementary School • Hughes Elementary School

  17. Academic Achievement Distinction Designation Reading/ELA Schools needed to be in quartile 1 of their comparison campuses in 2 of the following: • Greater Than Expected Student Growth in Reading/ELA • Grade 3 Reading Performance • Grade 4 Writing Performance • Grade 7 Writing Performance • Grade 8 Reading Performance • Overall Attendance Rate

  18. NISD Schools with Reading/ELA Distinctions • Medlin Middle School • Tidwell Middle School

  19. Academic Achievement Distinction Designation Mathematics Schools needed to be in quartile 1 of their comparison campuses in 2 of the following: • Greater Than Expected Student Growth in Mathematics • Grade 5 Mathematics Performance • Algebra I by Grade 8 - Participation • Algebra I by Grade 8 - Performance • Overall Attendance Rate

  20. NISD Schools with Mathematics Distinctions • Chisholm Trail Middle School • Hatfield Elementary School

More Related