1 / 27

Student Engagement in a Co-Sourced Learning Environment

Student Engagement in a Co-Sourced Learning Environment. Joanne Kossuth January 14, 2011. Olin College. Located in Needham, Massachusetts 4 year undergraduate engineering college Collaboration with Babson and Wellesley Colleges How is Olin Different? http://www.olin.edu

jam
Télécharger la présentation

Student Engagement in a Co-Sourced Learning Environment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Student Engagement in a Co-Sourced Learning Environment Joanne Kossuth January 14, 2011

  2. Olin College • Located in Needham, Massachusetts • 4 year undergraduate engineering college • Collaboration with Babson and Wellesley Colleges • How is Olin Different? • http://www.olin.edu • http://www.olinprojects.com

  3. Agenda • Learner Engagement • Assessment of Learner Engagement • Learning Environments • What should we be doing to increase engagement? • What is the impact of technology tools now available? • Who are the learners? • How do we create the cohesive co-sourced experience?

  4. Student Engagement • Create an emotionally safe environment • Create an intellectually safe environment • Cultivate an engagement meter (know your audience) • Practice different communication tools: journals, blogs, twitter (Mr. Wiki, Carpe-diem, HelpMe) • It is not just about the right answer but about the explanation (BOW, Grand Challenges)

  5. Student Engagement (Edutopia) • Teach self-awareness about knowledge • Questioning strategies make all students think • Use the design process to increase the quality of work • Teach students to market their work and sell their concepts • Olin examples: UOCD, EXPO, SCOPE

  6. Assessing Student Engagement • Level of Academic Challenge • Active and Collaborative Learning • Student-Faculty Interaction • Enriching Educational Experiences • Supportive Campus Environment

  7. Engagement Assessment:NSSE Categories • Diverse, but interpersonally fragmented • Homogeneous and interpersonally cohesive • Intellectually stimulating • Interpersonally supportive • High-Tech, low-touch • Academically challenging and supportive • Collaborative

  8. Other Student Engagement • Chat with a librarian • E-portfolios • Graduation planners (degree audit) • Self service administrative functions • Ask Us, Chat with Us, Blog with Us, etc. • Others?

  9. Learning Environments • Face to Face • Blended • On line • At a distance • Immersive

  10. Environment Types • High collaboration/low self-direction • Classroom with breakout • Multi purpose room • High collaboration/ high self direction • Project room • Conference room

  11. Types II • Low collaboration/low self direction • Lecture hall • Computer classroom • Low collaboration/ high self direction • Distance learning class • Media lab

  12. Increasing Engagement • Shift our focus from education to life-long learning • Navigate the increased availability of resources on the internet • Lack of resource constraint • Reflection and practice • Make work in progress public

  13. Increasing Engagement, Cont. • Provide education in giving and receiving feedback (orientation, FIB) • Increase peer interaction • Learn from others • Learn from failure (as well as success) • Multiple learning opportunities from shared “public” learning experiences • Learn more about “learning to be”

  14. Technology Use • Questions about the effectiveness of new technologies for enhancing education • Little focus on evolvingappropriate new teaching practices to take advantage of the potential of the new technologies • Technology, alone, is not the solution • What has been your experience?

  15. Students • Students multitask; create and learn at the same time • Need to access content easily and be able to manipulate the content in a personal manner • Their way is the right way for their learning style • These activities bridge learning and knowledge

  16. Learning Profiles (Mosley) • Transforming Learners  prefer loosely structured, flexible mentoring environments that promote challenging goals, discovery, strategies, problem solving, and self-managed learning. • Performing Learners   prefer semi-structured environments that stimulate personal value and provide details, tasks, processes, and creative interaction (hands-on) not exploration and great effort. • Conforming Learners  prefer simple, safe, low-learner control, structured environments that help learners achieve comfortable, low-risk learning goals in a linear fashion.

  17. Creativity Traits • Seven traits of creative people: • independence of judgment • self-confidence • attraction to complexity • aesthetic orientation • openness to experience • risk taking • self-actualization (Sternberg et al, 2005. p. 358). • Where do these traits fit with the creativity traits? • Where do these traits intersect with knowledge?

  18. Content • Knowledge is combined in new and exciting ways by the learners themselves • Innovation occurs at these edges • Examples: • Wikipedia • Creative commons • Open source • Video (You-Tube) • Gaming • Mobile applications • What has been your experience?

  19. Content • Important to interact with classmates online (Muirhead) • Reflect and comment on observations and ideas • Be constructive • Suggest alternative solutions • Identify potential or real problems • Explore new theories • Share relevant work and research experiences and knowledge

  20. Tools • Personal learning environments • YouTube • Blogs, Wikis • Facebook • Chats • GPS • Crowd sourcing • Games/augmented reality

  21. Tools II • Cloud services • SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, AaaS • Rackspace, Dropbox, Google Docs, Google Apps, Microsoft Live, bill.com, salesforce.com • Skype • Others?

  22. Potential Co-sourced Example • Student designed personal learning environment web site • Website running on institutional servers in Rackspace (cloud service) • MiMedia cloud storage and backup • Photos from FLICKR • E-portfolio of work • Videos from Youtube

  23. Example, cont. • Music from iTunes • Skype for video conferencing • Google docs for collaboration with others • Wiki for community source work • Research from library databases throughout the world on topics of interest • My blog and My surveys/research • Links faculty and expert resources

  24. Where do Educators Fit? • What is our role in this new paradigm? • Are we relevant? • What do we need to do to adapt and continue to serve our future leaders?

  25. Resources • http://www.edutopia.org/project-learning-teaching-strategies • http://www.nsse.iub.edu/ • http://nsse.iub.edu/NSSE_2010_Results/pdf/NSSE_2010_AnnualResults.pdf#page=8 • http://www.johnseelybrown.com/newlearning.pdf • http://www.trainingplace.com/source/research/designingenvironments.htm

  26. Resources • http://ifets.ieee.org/discussions/discuss_september2006.html • http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/StudentEngagement/213723 • http://cpr.iub.edu/uploads/Pike,%20Kuh%20(2005)%20A%20Typology%20of%20Student%20Engagement%20for%20American%20Colleges%20and%20Universities.pdf

  27. Resources • http://www.wgsite.com/Resources/LearningEnvironments.pdf • Muirhead, 2006c, Weekly Participation, para 1

More Related