1 / 10

Student Paper Awards Subcommittee

Student Paper Awards Subcommittee. Rob Taylor Structures TC Meeting 10/11/2012. 2013 SDM Student Papers Technical Chair. John Whitcomb jdw@tamu.edu 979-845-4006 Using same process and criteria as 2012. Student Awards Process for SDM (Long Range Planning Requirements).

janae
Télécharger la présentation

Student Paper Awards Subcommittee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Student Paper Awards Subcommittee Rob Taylor Structures TC Meeting 10/11/2012

  2. 2013 SDM Student Papers Technical Chair • John Whitcombjdw@tamu.edu979-845-4006 • Using same process and criteria as 2012

  3. Student Awards Process for SDM (Long Range Planning Requirements) • Student papers can be scheduled throughout the entire week of the conference (M - Th). • First round of the contest will be based on the manuscripts. All the student paper manuscripts will be evaluated using predetermined criteria to be provided by Student Paper Chair to a panel of judges representing all the TCs and co-located conferences. • This review of the manuscripts will be the responsibility of the panel of judges and will be coordinated by Student Paper Chair. • Based on the manuscript ratings for all the student manuscripts, the Student Paper Chair will down select the Top 6 manuscripts for the second round of the contest. • The second round of the contest will consist of judging the actual presentations of the students. The Student Paper Chair will provide the judging criteria. • The Student Paper Chair will assemble a panel of judges for the Top 6 paper presentations. • Top 6 student papers will be judged in a special evening (recommended Tuesday, but could be Sunday or Monday, to the discretion of the SDM Organizing Committee) judging session. This session is expected to run for 3.5 – 4 hours.

  4. Student Awards Process for SDM (Long Range Planning Requirements) • The SDM Student Paper Chair is only responsible for selecting the Jefferson Goblet and the American Society for Composite (ASC) student paper award winners. • The 6 finalists based on manuscripts will include at least 2 composite material or composite structures related papers. • The highest ranked paper based on manuscript and presentation will receive the Jefferson Goblet Award. • The highest ranked composite related paper will receive the ASC student paper award. If the Jefferson Goblet award is given to a composite related paper, the second ranked composite related paper will receive the ASC award. • The names of the Jefferson Goblet and ASC awardees will be shared with the Structures TC. The Structures TC will be responsible for selecting the Lockheed Martin and Hilton award winners. The winners of the Jefferson Goblet and ASC awards will be excluded from receiving the Structures TC sponsored student paper awards.

  5. Time Line for Student Paper Competition • Aug – Student Paper Chair Sends draft judging criteria to SDM planning committee • Sep – SDM planning committee finalizes judging criteria • Oct – Chairs provide list of all student papers to SDM Student Paper Chair. • Oct – Send manuscript judging criteria to authors. • Jan – Contact TC reps and conference chairs for list of manuscript reviewers. • Feb – Manuscript reviewer assignments complete. • Mar – Send oral presentation judging criteria to authors. • Mar – Contact TC reps and conference chairs for list of presentation reviewers. • Mar – Notify students that have not submitted manuscript that they have until 2 Apr to submit manuscript. • Apr – Student manuscript deadline • Apr – Contact delinquent students to inform them that their paper has been withdrawn from student competition. • Apr – Manuscript reviews complete, TC/conference reps give rankings to student papers chair • Apr – Teleconto downselect 6 finalists • Apr – Student papers chair notifies all students of status • Apr – Student presentation session at SDM Conference

  6. Manuscript Judging Criteria

  7. Oral Presentation Judging Criteria

  8. Manuscript Reviews • Last year • 127 student abstracts • 99 student manuscripts uploaded • 14 Structures manuscripts • Very tight schedule—Submission deadline April 2 to review deadline April 9 • Subcommittee organization very helpful in completing process 2012 Reviewers—Thank you! Mike Hyer Mary Mahler Michael Enright Marc Schultz Maenghyo Cho Stan Smeltzer Moshe Domb Mike Ross Eric Lundgren Michael Wolff JohanneHeald Anthony Palazotto Lisa Hardaway Jeanette Domber Joe Hackel John Wang Mark Sensmeier Harry Hilton—willing but recused

  9. Finalists • 8 students invited to present at Tuesday evening judging session • 6 Finalists Eligible for Jefferson Goblet • Need 2 composites papers in 6 finalists eligible for ASC (Amer. Soc. Comp.) award • Next 2 Structures manuscripts eligible for Structures TC awards but not Jefferson Goblet or ASC award • Need Structures reviewers • At least 1 for 6 finalist session • Best to have multiple reviewers for Structures finalists • Confusing to student finalists

  10. Personal Opinion • Tuesday evening judging session is very difficult to manage, conflicts with all TC meetings, and is unfair to students • Intractable if additional awards added • I don’t know best solution but LRP really needs to address and revise process

More Related