1 / 28

A community service-learning approach to destigmatise student perceptions about psychiatric patients

A community service-learning approach to destigmatise student perceptions about psychiatric patients. Stefanus Snyman , Martie van Heusden. Context of study. Positioned in context of curriculum design Specific application in Health Sciences Education (HSE)

javen
Télécharger la présentation

A community service-learning approach to destigmatise student perceptions about psychiatric patients

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A community service-learning approach to destigmatise student perceptions about psychiatric patients Stefanus Snyman, Martie van Heusden

  2. Context of study • Positioned in context of curriculum design • Specific application in Health Sciences Education (HSE) • Purpose of HSE: To prepare students to address the health needs of patients and communities effectively (Kern et al, 2009)

  3. The challenge: Students are not crazy about Psychiatry • Negative and stigmatising attitudes of medical students towards psychiatric patients (Gelder, 1998) • Attitude usually improve while rotating through Psychiatry, but not for long (Sinclair, 1997) • WHO estimates: 500 million people suffer from psychiatric disorders (WHO, 2011)

  4. The challenge: The Psychiatry curriculum • Not aligned • Overemphasis of cognitive (proposional knowledge) with progression to psychomotor skills during clinical rotations • Students struggle to contextualise (epistemic knowledge) and to develop personalskills through reflection on reflection in action (Wensing et al, 2010;Lucket, 2009) • Negative evaluation of Middle clinical rotation

  5. The interventionStep 1: What are we suppose to do? • Determine outcomes for Psychiatry: • International core curricula • World Psychiatric Association • World Federation for Medical Education • Leading universities • South African Legislation • Stellenbosch University’s Community interaction policy and Pedagogy of Hope • Faculty of Health Sciences vision - Leader in Africa

  6. The intervention Step 2: What was done already? • We analysed the exposure to mental health and psychiatry in medical curriculum

  7. Step 3: Determine outcomes for Middle Clinical Rotation • Continuity between 3rd year theory and Late Clinical Rotation • Formulate clear outcomes: • Clinical exposure and skills regarding Psychiatry • Integrated theoretical component • Graduate Attributes • Service-learning approach

  8. The InterventionStep 4: Clinical and community exposure • Thorough orientation • Clinical exposure and skills • Contextualising theory • Continuous assessment

  9. The Intervention Step 5: Graduate Attributes • Communication • Counselling • Role in a team • Reflective practitioner • Bio-psycho-social-spiritual approach • Social responsiveness • Ethics • Human Rights

  10. The Intervention: Step 7: Community Engagement (service-learning) • Focus from “our” perspective: • Impact of psychiatric disorders on community • Outside ivory tower of hardcore “super-specialised” psychiatry • Psychosocial rehabilitation • Prevention and mental health promotion • University’s CE policy • Collaboration with 7 NGO’s (12 placements)

  11. The question What difference did a community service-learning approachmake to destigmatisestudent perceptions about psychiatric patients?

  12. Method • Interpretive paradigm with a qualitative inductive approach • Focus group interviews were conducted with 32 students: • Immediately after the completion • A year later, to determine if non-stigmatising changes in perceptions, if any, were sustained. • Interviews were also conducted to determine if students, who previously followed the traditional Psychiatry course, have in accordance with international trends, stigmatising perceptions about psychiatric patients. • Student reflections analysed

  13. Results: Group who followed previous curriculum • Questioning role of Psychiatryin medicine I don’t think it [Psychiatry] is a medical subjectI don’t know where it fits in Niedeel van my verwysingsraamwerknie

  14. Results: Group who followed previous curriculum • Fear I’m still afraid of psychiatric patients • Confused My fear was just replaced by confusion Ek kan honestly nie … kop of stert uitmaak nie • Unorganised

  15. Results: Group immediately after revised curriculum • Role of Psychiatry acknowledged as brain pathology • Fear for Psychiatric patients overcome • Knowledge integration due to community engagement and clinical experience at Lentegeur hospital • The correlation between textbook and what you saw there [community] was very evident … it was astronomical, like our benefits. • .. .got most of my basic knowledge that I need to know [at Lentegeur]. I probably will use most of that knowledge … [as] general practitioner.

  16. Results: Group immediately after revised curriculum • Acceptance of psychiatric patients • … one thing I really learnt … behind all of that there is a person… • I need to start treating psychiatric patients … as a real condition and not just some crazy person …

  17. Results: Group immediately after revised curriculum • Better clinical experience … for the first time you do actually feel like a medical student. You are tired the whole time, you are working a lot, and I think maybe it gave us a little bit of an idea what it would be like to be SIs, and as tough as it was, I think it was important. A very valuable skill … psychiatric interview I spoke to … final years … we were actually better off because we got a chance to at least see patients … • Learning outside tertiary complex … I felt that I learnt a lot more there … The doctors there were way more prepared.

  18. Results: Group immediately after revised curriculum • Graduate attributes cultivated: • Counselling • Better communication • Interprofessionality • Role of community and community organisations • Bio-psycho-social-spiritual approach • Teamwork • “multi-tasking”

  19. Results: Group immediately after revised curriculum • Social responsiveness Die gemeenskapsprojek … vir ons dokters wat in Suid-Afrika opgelei word … gewys ons kan hier iets beteken.. … I have realised … my life [is revolving] around Stellenbosch University … thinking that that is the end of the world … we do need to get out of these gates, there is a whole new world out there that we do need to experience. (5th year) the community project linked with reflection … is important and everybody learns a lot from it, but …

  20. Results: Group immediately after revised curriculum • Personal growth … I have always been told throughout my course is that we need to detach ourselves from our patients … something that I have been struggling with, but … on psychiatry I actually realised that there is no way that you can actually detach emotionally from them… I actually realised that it’s not necessary … it just makes me more human … helps me to give better care to my patients… (5th year) … I have never seen that in any other rotation… that kind of relationship ever… the amount of attention and the amount of empathy that they gave to this patient … that is the kind of attention that I need to give to my patients…

  21. Results: Group immediately after revised curriculum • Logistic and administration “Die bes georganiseerde blok ooit…”

  22. Results: A year later – the positives • “Middle rotation totally took away stigmatisation” • Now… I see the benefit of … [S-L] project and the reflections • ... I got angry ... With the perceptions of those doctors [stigmatising patients] • “The community project stood out for me and it’s something I’ll take with me for the rest of my live” • “it definitely changed my perception... broadened my scope...” • Nice to see psychiatric conditions ... in ... ordinary people ... • Interact with [psychiatric] people with their normal sort of daily ... psychiatric conditions ...

  23. Results: A year later – the positives • The impact society has on mental illness • The impact mental illness has on society • … Impact on families and how they adapted their entire lifestyle…

  24. Results: A year later – the challenges • Programme too busy • Not uniform approach to patients • Within Psychiatry • What is taught in other disciplines

  25. Results: A year later – the challenges • Community project • Convincing all stakeholders that “non-hardcore Psychiatry” is also department’s role • Selecting the right community partners to reach outcomes • Improve design of structured reflections • Be careful that community projects don’t overwhelm students • Better coaching of students

  26. Conclusion • Sustained non-stigmatising perceptions about psychiatric patients were found in students who participated in CSL activities, compared to stigmatising perceptions in those who previously completed the traditional course in Psychiatry. • These perceptions were still present a year after the rotation

  27. Take home message • Medical faculties worldwide can take note that a CSL approach contributes to ensure sustained, non-stigmatising perceptions among medical students about psychiatric patients.

  28. Thank you • Students • Tygerberg- en Lentegeur lecturers • Dr Antoinette Smith-Tolken • Dr Alwyn Louw • Prof Dana Niehaus • Jacob du Plessis • FINLO

More Related