1 / 30

The story of CP Violation has changed qualitatively in the past two years.

f CP. f CP. Time-Dependent Particle-Antiparticle Asymmetries in the Neutral B-Meson System Michael D. Sokoloff University of Cincinnati. The story of CP Violation has changed qualitatively in the past two years.

jayme-branch
Télécharger la présentation

The story of CP Violation has changed qualitatively in the past two years.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. fCP fCP Time-Dependent Particle-Antiparticle Asymmetries in the Neutral B-Meson SystemMichael D. SokoloffUniversity of Cincinnati The story of CP Violation has changed qualitatively in the past two years. Babar and BELLE have observed time-dependent CP violation in neutral B-mesons, in accord with the Standard Model. The ensemble of these and other results appear to validate the Kobayashi-Maskawa mechanism as the source of CP violation in the electroweak sector. New Physics may yet be manifest in CP violation measurements to come. Michael D. Sokoloff

  2. The Nature of Particle Physics • Particle physicists study the fundamental constituents of matter and their interactions. • Our understanding of these issues is built upon certain fundmental principles • The laws of physics are the same everywhere • The laws of physics are the same at all times • The laws of physics are the same in all inertial reference systems (the special theory of relativity) • The laws of physics should describe how the wave function of a system evolves in time (quantum mechanics) • These principles do not tell us what types of fundamental particles exist, or how they interact, but they restrict the types of theories that are allowed by Nature. • In the past 30 years we have developed a Standard Model of particle phyiscs to describe the electromagnetic, weak nuclear, and strong nuclear interactions of constituents in terms of quantum field theories. Michael D. Sokoloff

  3. Special Relativity • Energy and Momentum • Energy and momentum form a four-vector (t,x,y,z). The Lorentz invariant quantity defined by energy and momentum is mass: • For the special case when an object is at rest so that its momentum is zero • When a particle decays in the laboratory, we can measure the energy and momenta of it decay products (its daughter particles), albeit imperfectly. • The energy of the parent is exactly the sum of the energies of its daughters. Similarly, each component of the parent’s momentum is the sum of the corresponding components of the daughters’ momenta. From the reconstructed energy and momentum of the candidate parent, we can calculate its invariant mass. Michael D. Sokoloff

  4. Classical Field Theory (E&M) Michael D. Sokoloff

  5. Fields and Quanta • Electromagnetic fields transfer energy and momentum from one charged particle to another. • Electromagnetic energy/momentum is quantized: • E = hn ; p = hn/c • These quanta are called photons: g • In relativistic quantum field theory: Amg • To calculate cross-sections and decay rates we use perturbation theory based on Feynman Diagrams: Michael D. Sokoloff

  6. The Nobel Prize in Physics 2004 Gross Politzer Wilczek Strong Nuclear Interactions of Quarks and Gluons Each quark carries one of three strong charges, and each antiquark carries an anticharge. For convenience, we call these colors: Just as photons are the quanta of EM fields, gluons are the quanta of strong nuclear fields; however, while photons are electrically neutral, gluons carry color-anticolor quantum numbers. Michael D. Sokoloff

  7. Baryons and Mesons • Quarks are never observed as free particles. • Baryons consist of three quarks, each with a different color (strong nuclear) charge proton = neutron = • Mesons consist of quark-antiquark pairs with canceling color-anticolor charges • Baryons and meson (collectively known as hadrons) have net color charge zero. • A Van der Waals-types of strong interaction creates an attractive force which extends a short distance (~ 1 fm) to bind nucleii together. Michael D. Sokoloff

  8. Weak Charged Current Interactions charm decay neutrino scattering f ~ f As a first approximation, the weak charged current interaction couples fermions of the same generation. The Standard Model explain couplings between quark generations in terms of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matirx. Michael D. Sokoloff

  9. b = f1; a = f2; g = f3 Weak Phases in the Standard Model Michael D. Sokoloff

  10. Particle-Antiparticle Mixing • A second order weak charged current process, a box diagram amplitude, provides a mechanism by which particles oscillate into antiparticles. • Particles decay exponentially with characteristic times • Neutral B-mesons mix sinusoidally with characteristic times • Experimentally which makes mixing observation relatively easy. Michael D. Sokoloff

  11. fCP fCP Time-Dependent CP Violation • Both particles and antiparticles can decay to common final states which are CP eigenstates. As an example, • The final state is invariant under charge and parity conjugation; that is, it remains . • The Standard Model predicts that the CKM phase will produce a time dependent asymmetry in the decays of and to this final state, and that the asymmetry will vary sinusoidally. Michael D. Sokoloff

  12. fCP Elements of Macroscopic CP Violation Michael D. Sokoloff

  13. Some Relevant Feynman Diagrams Michael D. Sokoloff

  14. The PEP-II Storage Ring at SLAC Total: 244 fb-1 (Jul 31st 04) • PEP-II is SLAC’s e+e-B factory running at the (4S) c.m. energy • The (4S) resonance decays to charged and neutral B-anti-B pairs Michael D. Sokoloff

  15. BaBar Detector All subsystems crucial for CP analysis SVT:97% efficiency, 15 mm z hit resolution (inner layers, transverse tracks) SVT+DCH: (pT)/pT = 0.13 %  pT+ 0.45 % DIRC: K- separation 4.2  @ 3.0 GeV/c  2.5  @ 4.0 GeV/c EMC:E/E = 2.3 %E-1/4  1.9 %

  16. Belle Detector Aerogel Cherenkov cnt. n=1.015~1.030 SC solenoid 1.5T 3.5GeV e+ CsI(Tl) 16X0 TOF counter 8GeV e- Tracking + dE/dx small cell + He/C2H5 m / KL detection 14/15 lyr. RPC+Fe Si vtx. det. 3 lyr. DSSD

  17. e+e-  (4S)  BB m- Flavor tag and vertex reconstruction K- Btag m- Brec m+ B0 KS B0 p+ Coherent L=1 state p- Start the Clock Stop the Clock Experimental Technique at the (4S) Resonance Boost: bg= 0.55 (4S) Exclusive B meson and vertex reconstruction Michael D. Sokoloff

  18. ( ) Identifying Fully Reconstructed B’s For fits, both Belle and Babar characterize signals and backgrounds with PDF’s which utilize Mbc, DE, tagging category, etc. Michael D. Sokoloff

  19. typical mistagging & finite time resolution Tagging Errors and Finite Dt Resolution perfect tagging & time resolution (f-) (f+) B0D(*)-p+/ r+/ a1+ Ntagged=23618 Purity=84% Michael D. Sokoloff

  20. r = estimated tagging dilution 6 hep-ex/020825 v1 Effective Tagging Efficiency QQ=e(1-2w)2 Michael D. Sokoloff

  21. sin2b Golden Sample: (cc)KS and (cc)KL 85 x 106 BB evts 2938 events used tomeasure sin2f1 Michael D. Sokoloff

  22. CP odd: sin 2f1 = 0.716  0.083 CP even: sin 2f1 = 0.78  0.17 sin(2b) Fit Results |lf| = 0.948  0.051 (stat)  0.017 (sys) Scss = sin(2f1 ) = 0.759  0.074 (stat)  0.032 (sys) sin(2f1 ) = 0.719  0.074 (stat)  0.035 (sys)asumming |lf| = 1 (hep-ex/020825, v1) Summer 2002 Michael D. Sokoloff

  23. |lf| = 0.948  0.051 (stat)  0.017 (syst) Sf = 0.759  0.074 (stat)  0.032 (syst) } hf =-1 sin(2b) Fit Results hf =+1 hf =-1 sin2b = 0.755  0.074 sin2b = 0.723  0.158 sin2b = 0.741  0.067 (stat)  0.034 (sys) with |lf| = 1 Summer 2002 Michael D. Sokoloff

  24. Golden Modes with a Lepton Tag The best of the best! Ntagged = 220 Purity = 98% Mistag fraction 3.3% sDt 20% better than other tag categories background Consistent results across mode, data sample, tagging category sin2b = 0.79  0.11 Michael D. Sokoloff

  25. r = r (1-l2/2) h = h (1-l2/2) sin2b = 0.722  0.040 (stat)  0.023 (sys) sin2b = 0.741  0.067 (stat)  0.034 (sys) sin2f1= 0.728  0.056 (stat)  0.023 (sys) sin2f1= 0.719  0.074 (stat)  0.035 (sys) HFAG@ICHEP2004: Im(lyK) = 0.725  0.037 Standard Model Comparison One solution for b is in excellent agreement with measurements of unitarity triangle apex Method as in Höcker et al, Eur. Phys.J.C21:225-259,2001 Nir@ICHEP2002: Im(lyK) = 0.734  0.054 Michael D. Sokoloff

  26. sin2b from the Penguin Decay bsss 2.4 from s-penguin to sin2 (cc) 2.7 from s-penguin to sin2 (cc) Michael D. Sokoloff

  27. With Penguins (P): B pp to Measure sin2aeff No Penguins (Tree only): mixing decay Michael D. Sokoloff

  28. B ppCP Asymmetry Results Michael D. Sokoloff

  29. B ppCP Asymmetry Results PRL 93, 021601 (2004)152M BB pairs Michael D. Sokoloff

  30. Time-Dependent CP Violation in B-DecaysA Summary Babar and BELLE have observed time-dependent CP violation in neutral B-mesons, in accord with the Standard Model. HFAG@ICHEP2004: Im(lyK) = 0.725  0.037 The ensemble of these and other results appear to validate the Kobayashi-Maskawa mechanism as the source of CP violation in the electroweak sector. New Physics may yet be manifest in CP violation measurements to come. Lots of experimental work is being done. Several “> 2.5s” effects are stimulating theoretical work. Michael D. Sokoloff

More Related