1 / 25

Capital Budgeting Techniques: Evaluating Investment Proposals

This chapter explores the capital budgeting decision-making process and four methods for evaluating investment proposals: payback period, net present value, internal rate of return, and profitability index.

Télécharger la présentation

Capital Budgeting Techniques: Evaluating Investment Proposals

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Capital Budgeting Decision 12 Chapter

  2. What is Capital Budgeting? 4 Methods of Evaluating Investment Proposals Payback Period Net Present Value Internal Rate of Return Profitability index Accept/Reject Decision Net Present Value Profile Summary and Conclusions Chapter 12 - Outline

  3. Capital Budgeting Techniques Should we build this plant?

  4. What is Capital Budgeting? Capital Budgeting: • represents a long-term investment decision • for example, buy a new computer system or build a new plant • involves the planning of expenditures for a project with a life of 1 or more years • emphasizes amounts and timing of cash flows and opportunity costs and benefits • investment usually requires a large initial cash outflow with the expectation of future cash inflows • considers only those cash flows that will change as a result of the investment • all cash flows are calculated after tax

  5. Table 12-1Cash flow for Alston Corporation Earnings before amortization and taxes (cash inflow) . . . $20,000 Amortization (non-cash expense) . . . . . . . . 5,000 Earnings before taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,000 Taxes (cash outflow) . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,500 Earnings after taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,500 Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + 5,000 Cash flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,500

  6. 4 Methods of Evaluating Investment Proposals • Payback Period (PP) • Internal Rate of Return (IRR) • Net Present Value (NPV) • Profitability Index (PI)

  7. Types of Capital Projects Independent Projects • Projects whose cash flows are not affected by the acceptance or rejection of other projects. • Ex: A book publishing company trying to purchase a TV network Mutually Exclusive Projects • A set of projects where the acceptance of one project means the others cannot be accepted • Ex: Got a parcel of land: Build apartments or Amusement parks

  8. Accounting, finance, engineering Decision making Idea development Collection of data Results Assign probabilities Reassign probabilities Reevaluation PPT 12-4 Figure 12-1Capital budgeting procedures

  9. Payback Period Payback Period (PP): • computes the amount of time required to recoup the initial investment • a cutoff period is established • Advantages: • easy to use (“quick and dirty” approach) • emphasizes liquidity • Disadvantages: • ignores inflows after the cutoff period • fails to consider the time value of money

  10. Formula For Pay Back period where, A= The year in which the cumulative net cash flow is nearer to NCO NCO= Net cash outlay C=Cumulative net cash flow of year A. D= Net cash flow of the year following the year A

  11. Net Present Value Net Present Value (NPV): • the present value of the cash inflows minus the present value of the cash outflows • the future cash flows are discounted back over the life of the investment • the basic discount rate is usually the firm’s cost of capital (WACC)(assuming similar risk)

  12. Net Present Value (NPV) Method • NPV is a method of evaluating capital investment proposals by finding the present value of future net cash flows, discounted at the rate of return required by the firm • One of two discounted cash flow (DCF) techniques using time value of money that we will cover NPV = PV of inflows – Cost (Initial Investment) = Net gain in wealth

  13. NPV Method: Advantage • It Considers the time value of money concept. • It considers the total benefit arising out of invest proposal over its life time. • It is particularly useful for the selection of mutually exclusive project. NPV Method: Disadvantage • It involves the calculation of the required rate of return to discount the cash flows. • It is absolute measures that favors the higher present value project that may also involves a larger initial outlay. • In case of projects having different lives it may not give dependable results.

  14. PPT 12-12 Internal Rate of Return Internal Rate of Return (IRR): • represents a yield on an investment or an interest rate • requires calculating the discount rate that equates the initial cash outflow (cost) with the future cash inflows (benefits) • is the discount rate where the cash outflows equal the cash inflows (or NPV = 0)

  15. Formula for IRR PV of inflows = Investment Cost (Initial Investment) So the discount rate at which NPV=O is IRR.

  16. IRR: Advantage • Business executives and non-technical people understand the concept of IRR much more readily than they understand the concept of NPV. • IRR recognizes the time value of money concepts. • It considers all the cash flows occurring over the entire life of the project. • It does not use the concept of required rate of return. • It is consistent with the overall objective of maximizing shareholders’ wealth.

  17. IRR: Disadvantage • Multiple IRRs • Calculation is very much difficult. • It is determined based on the assumption that all intermediate cash inflows are reinvested at IRR.

  18. Profitability Index Method • The method measures the present value of returns per unit of present value of investment. • The profitability index is defined as the ratio which is obtained by dividing the present value of future cash inflows by cash outflows.

  19. The Profitability Index (PI) • Advantages: • May be useful when available investment funds are limited • Easy to understand and communicate • Correct decision when evaluating independent projects • Disadvantages: • Problems with mutually exclusive investments> ignores differences in scale

  20. Accept/Reject Decision Payback Period (PP): • if PP < cutoff period, accept the project • if PP > cutoff period, reject the project Internal Rate of Return (IRR): • if IRR > cost of capital, accept the project • if IRR < cost of capital, reject the project Net Present Value (NPV): • if NPV > 0, accept the project • if NPV < 0, reject the project Profitability Index (PI) • if PI > 1, accept the project • if PI > 1, reject the project

  21. Net Present Value Profile Net Present Value Profile: • a graph of the NPV of a project at different discount rates shows the NPV at 3 different points: • a zero discount rate • the normal discount rate (or cost of capital) • the IRR • allows an easy way to visualize whether or not an investment should be undertaken

  22. Net present value ($) 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Investment B IRRB = 14.33% Investment A 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% IRRA = 11.16% Discount rate (percent) Figure 12-2Net present value profile B A B A

  23. $200 $800 0 1 2 3 - $800 -$200 100% = IRR2 0% = IRR1 Multiple IRRs (Project C) There are two IRRs for this project: Which one should we use?

  24. Summary and Conclusions • Payback period indicates risk and liquidity of a project • NPV gives a direct measure of the dollar benefit to the shareholders • IRR provides information about a project’s “safety margin” • IRR reinvestment assumption may be unrealistic • Watch out for multiple IRRs

  25. Summary and Conclusions • This chapter evaluates the most popular alternatives to NPV: • Payback period • Internal rate of return • Profitability index • When it is all said and done, they are not the NPV rule; for those of us in finance, it makes them decidedly second-rate.

More Related