1 / 57

Chapter 13

Chapter 13. Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population. Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs. Percent Urban by Region.

Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 13

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 13 Urban Patterns

  2. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

  3. Percent Urban by Region Fig. 13-2b: Although under half of the people in most less developed regions are urban, Latin America and the Middle East have urban percentages comparable to MDCs.

  4. The exceptional nature of American cities 1: Gigantic “footprints” for the urbanized area • Chicago vs. London • Low densities • The predominance of SFDs 2: Suburban Dominance • Only 3 million out of 8 million in Chicago metropolitan area live in the city of Chicago 3: Much greater levels of automobile dependency

  5. 4. Very steep density gradients • High-rise downtown vs. low-density sprawl 5. Inverse social Geography • Rich on periphery • Poor in the center

  6. Contemporary Neighborhood types in American Central Cities • 1: declining “ghetto complexes” • 2: “new immigrant enclaves” • 3: gentrified “core areas”

  7. 1: Declining Ghetto Complexes • A: These neighborhoods are products of historical and continued racial segregation, exhibiting African American populations of 90-100%. • B: very steep and sustained population losses. • Ex. Washington Park neighborhood in Chicago lost almost 1/3 of it population between 1990 and 2000. • C: job losses, capital flight, and diminishing local economic opportunity • D: virtually no new foreign-born immigrants have settled in these neighborhoods

  8. 2: The New Immigrant Enclaves a. Very impressive population growth • 45% in Gage Park, average growth of 20% b. Geographical expansion as well c. Middle position in terms of quality of life indicators d. Most of the “multi-ethnic” census tracts are found in these zones

  9. 3: Gentrified “Core Area” • Moderate population gains *slight increase in areas where industry was converted to residential use *slight decreases in traditionally residential neighborhoods being subject to gentrification • Economic dynamism • Rising incomes *The Near North Side jumped from $43,000 to $92,000 between 1990 and 2000. • Dramatic gains in the value of real estate *In the Gold Coast, the value of real estate appreciated 9.4 times faster than the city average between 1991 and 1997.

  10. Urban Structure • Three models of urban structure • Concentric zone model • Sector model • Multiple nuclei model • Geographic applications • Use of the models outside North America • European cities • Less developed countries

  11. Concentric Zone Model Fig. 13-5: In the concentric zone model, a city grows in a series of rings surrounding the CBD.

  12. Sector Model Fig. 13-6: In the sector model, a city grows in a series of wedges or corridors extending out from the CBD.

  13. Multiple Nuclei Model Fig. 13-7: The multiple nuclei model views a city as a collection of individual centers, around which different people and activities cluster.

  14. Indianapolis: Percent Renters Fig. 13-8: The distribution of renters in Indianapolis illustrates the concentric zone model.

  15. Indianapolis: Household Income Fig. 13-9: The distribution of high income households in Indianapolis is an example of a sector model.

  16. Indianapolis: Ethnic Patterns Fig. 13-10: The distribution of minorities in Indianapolis is an example of a multiple nuclei model.

  17. Professionals in Glasgow Fig. 13-11: Top professionals in Glasgow, Scotland, are more likely to live near the center of the city, in contrast to most U.S. cities.

  18. Mexico City Fig. 13-12: The Aztec city of Tenochtitlán was built on an island in Lake Texcoco. Today poorer people live on a landfill in the former lakebed, and the elite live to the west.

  19. Fès (Fez), Morocco Fig. 13-13: The old city has narrow winding streets and dense population. The French laid out a new district to the west with a geometric street pattern.

  20. Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Fig. 13-14: In Ho Chi Minh City (formerly Saigon), the French demolished the previous city and replaced it with a colonial design with boulevards and public squares.

  21. Latin American City Model Fig. 13-15: In many Latin American cities, the wealthy live in the inner city and in a sector extending along a commercial spine.

  22. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Fig. 13-16: High income households in Rio de Janeiro live in the CBD and in a spine along the ocean. Low-income households often live in peripheral areas.

  23. Inner Cities • Inner-city physical problems • Deterioration process • Urban renewal • Inner-city social problems • Underclass • Culture of poverty • Inner-city economic problems • Annexation

More Related