270 likes | 473 Vues
PEER 2G02 – Code Usage Exercise: OpenSees Zhaohui Yang UCSD 2/15/2005. Treasure Island site. Total model height: 100 m (328 ft) Discretized into 106 elements Lysmer transmitting boundary with incident motion specified as ½ of the outcropping motion given . Model base.
E N D
PEER 2G02 – Code Usage Exercise: OpenSees Zhaohui Yang UCSD 2/15/2005
Total model height: 100 m (328 ft) • Discretized into 106 elements • Lysmer transmitting boundary with incident motion specified as ½ of the outcropping motion given Model base Elastic half space
G/Gmax and damping curves • Fitted MD/damping curves (blue) were used at UCLA • Measured MR curves (red) were used at UCSD, with higher damping
Rayleigh damping employed: Damping ratio = 1% at 1 Hz and 6 Hz (as measured damping ratio at low strain is about 1%)
Comments on response spectrum • All analyses give similar spectrum shapes. • Compared to rock outcropping motion, response at soil surface is amplified for period > 0.25 sec and de-amplified for period < 0.25 sec. • Nonlinear analysis results are much lower than that of SHAKE at period 0.6-2 sec, due to strong nonlinearity at this soft soil site. • UCLA response is generally higher than that of UCSD, due to lower damping curves used at UCLA.
Profile of maximum shear strain (UCSD) • approximately in proportion to shear wave velocity (Gmax) profile, as lower Gmax -> lower backbone curve -> more nonlinearity -> higher shear strain
Permanent displacement profile after shaking (UCSD) (strong correlation with shear wave velocity (Gmax) profile)
Location with strongest shear stress-strain response (UCSD) • Notice permanent shear strain incurred in a single pulse
Total model height: 170.7 m (560 ft) • Discretized into 173 elements • Lysmer transmitting boundary with incident motion specified as ½ of the outcropping motion given Model base Elastic half space
G/Gmax and damping curves • Fitted MD/damping curves (blue) were used at UCLA • Measured MR curves (red) were used at UCSD, with higher damping
G/Gmax and damping curves • Fitted MD/damping curves (blue) were used at UCLA • Measured MR curves (red) were used at UCSD, with higher damping
Rayleigh damping employed: • UCSD: Damping ratio = 3% at 1 Hz and 6 Hz (as measured damping ratio at low strain is about 3%) • UCLA: Damping ratio = 1% at 1 Hz and 6 Hz
Response Spectrum (5% damping) Significant surface amplification at 0.13-2 second periods
Comments on response spectrum • All analyses give similar spectrum shapes. • Compared to rock outcropping motion, response at soil surface is amplified for period > 0.13 sec and de-amplified for period < 0.13 sec. • Nonlinear analysis results are similar to that of SHAKE, as this site is more competent (less nonlinearity). • UCLA response is generally higher than that of UCSD, due to lower damping curves used at UCLA.
Profile of maximum shear strain (UCSD) • Strong correlation with shear wave velocity (Gmax) profile.