1 / 21

Sample 1

X. Sample 2 and 3. Sample 1. Sample 2. Sample 1. Sample 1. Sample 3. Constant heading surveys. Sample 2. Sample 1: Inside the eddy, ADCP, 60 s ensembles, rel vort. at z=20 m, 2 km gridding, no IWs, 2 cm/s rand. error. Sample 2: Outside the eddy, filament.

jhigdon
Télécharger la présentation

Sample 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. X Sample 2 and 3 Sample 1

  2. Sample 2 Sample 1

  3. Sample 1 Sample 3 Constant heading surveys Sample 2

  4. Sample 1: Inside the eddy, ADCP, 60 s ensembles, rel vort. at z=20 m, 2 km gridding, no IWs, 2 cm/s rand. error

  5. Sample 2: Outside the eddy, filament

  6. Sample 3: Outside the eddy, front

  7. Sample 2: Outside the eddy, filament, 1 km gridding

  8. Measured velocitiy fields IW velocity field variability is 3-9 times greater than model submesoscale variability Is IW velocity field reasonable? Jody data from Pacific Ocean

  9. Sample 2: Outside the eddy, filament, 2 km gridding, w/ IWs

  10. Ship track is significantly influence by IW velocities Not reflected in current analysis

  11. Horizontal Shear Spectra

  12. Scalar Variance Salt gradient spectra:

  13. Scalar Variance

  14. Scalar Variance

  15. Scalar Variance

  16. Scalar Variance • Time change following a patch:

  17. Points • Velocity and its gradients hard • Need IW “filter” like PV • Passive scalars easier • IW “filter” is semi-Lagrange transform (need depth info). • Scalar variance not correlated or scaled by background scalar gradients! • Very counter-intuitive • Scalar variance correlated in a patch for a number of hours (~10?)

More Related