1 / 12

WGA – 6th April 2004 Blocking the central foot / Validation

WGA – 6th April 2004 Blocking the central foot / Validation. Progress follow-up Validation process proposal Proposal for a first CM geometry stability criteria. Progress follow-up. Progress follow-up. Some information obtained. Magnet 3065 adjusted to itp20

joann
Télécharger la présentation

WGA – 6th April 2004 Blocking the central foot / Validation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WGA – 6th April 2004Blocking the central foot / Validation Progress follow-up Validation process proposal Proposal for a first CM geometry stability criteria

  2. Progress follow-up WGA workshop – 6th of april 2004 Presentation by Fabien Seyvet - Blocking the central foot/Validation

  3. Progress follow-up WGA workshop – 6th of april 2004 Presentation by Fabien Seyvet - Blocking the central foot/Validation

  4. Some information obtained Magnet 3065 adjusted to itp20 • No deformation of CM curvature during blocking • Transfer function accuracy remains within 15-20% • End cartography reliability WGA workshop – 6th of april 2004 Presentation by Fabien Seyvet - Blocking the central foot/Validation

  5. Some information obtained • WP01 geometric measurement re-implemented because of differences between itp20 and after cryostating (effect of transport and/or cryostating) WGA workshop – 6th of april 2004 Presentation by Fabien Seyvet - Blocking the central foot/Validation

  6. Some information obtained • During cryostating there has been some deformation imposed on CM • Procedure was changed (marked note* in follow-up table) • There might be other deformation effect as well WGA workshop – 6th of april 2004 Presentation by Fabien Seyvet - Blocking the central foot/Validation

  7. Some information obtained • Other example (3111), magnet still NC WGA workshop – 6th of april 2004 Presentation by Fabien Seyvet - Blocking the central foot/Validation

  8. Some information obtained • There exists an effect of transport (example on 3058) • It was studied based on previous data (geo. meas. at reception of CM), with the results that reshaped magnets only were affected by transport… WGA workshop – 6th of april 2004 Presentation by Fabien Seyvet - Blocking the central foot/Validation

  9. Some information obtained • An other example of difference between geometry at industry and after cryostating • Plus warm magnetic measurement of Juan G. at warm -> correlation WGA workshop – 6th of april 2004 Presentation by Fabien Seyvet - Blocking the central foot/Validation

  10. Validation process proposal • For >10 validation magnets • 3122,3111,1051,2063,1055**,3118, • 3119,2019,1073,3058,1088,3117, • 3129, at least • Evaluation of stability • With central foot blocked • Without central foot blocked • Comparison with one or several definite • geometry criteria at each step • **One cryodipole with all 3 support posts lubricated Plan CM transport Wp01 geometry meas. Cryostating Wp03 fiducialisation Blocking Cold test SM18 Wp08 fiducialsation. Cryodipole transport-> SMi2 Wp08b fiducialisation Tunnel WGA workshop – 6th of april 2004 Presentation by Fabien Seyvet - Blocking the central foot/Validation

  11. Proposal for a first CM geometry stability criteria • dS (sagitta error) • Representative of CM curvature. This is directly related to eliminating CM center lateral DOF • Calculated by AT-MAS (Elena’s section) providing CM sagitta error when compared with theoretical value (“validated” information) • Available for each steps • cryodipole assembly • cold tests • Transport -> Would enable partial evaluation of effect of central foot blockage AND the shape graphs, of course, as a first approximation… WGA workshop – 6th of april 2004 Presentation by Fabien Seyvet - Blocking the central foot/Validation

  12. Measurement of CM geometry and deformation, during cryogenic operation • Measurement from Juan G. on 1051 • Correlation of magnetic meas. with fidu geometric meas. obtained at room temperature • Method is still in validation period for cold meas. It seems not applicable for the validation process yet… • Measurement of cryostat fiducials during cool down • Missed on 1051 (planned for Monday and executed during WE without measurement running) • Next magnet should be identified… WGA workshop – 6th of april 2004 Presentation by Fabien Seyvet - Blocking the central foot/Validation

More Related