1 / 14

Experiences with EMS in combined road / waterway transport

Experiences with EMS in combined road / waterway transport. EMS Forum, September 18 th , 2012 André Pluimers Bolk Transport / Combi Terminal Twente. Topics. Introduction of our company Why and how we use EMS trucks Experiences Benefits Backward modal shift? Conclusion.

johana
Télécharger la présentation

Experiences with EMS in combined road / waterway transport

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Experienceswith EMS in combinedroad / waterway transport EMS Forum, September 18th, 2012 André Pluimers Bolk Transport / Combi Terminal Twente

  2. Topics • Introduction of ourcompany • Why and how we use EMS trucks • Experiences • Benefits • Backwardmodal shift? • Conclusion

  3. Bolk Transport • Private-owned business, € 45m turnover • Active in variousforms of transport (oversized, distribution, intermodal) • Founder of Combi Terminal Twente (CTT) • Bargecontainer service Rotterdam-Hengelo (200km) • Start of operation in 2001

  4. Combi Terminal Twente • Extendedgatefor Port of Rotterdam • Serving Twente region and Northern Germany • 2012: largestinland terminal of NL by volume

  5. Why and how we use EMS trucks • Why: Co-modalityforbetter service • Complementaryroad transport neededforoptimizingintermodal service (speed, closing time, peakshaving) • EMS reducesroadtruckingrate to bargerate • Has contributed to growth of CTT • How: Terminal-terminaltraffic • CTT has steady and “own” freight base with the proper characteristics • Combination of 20’ and 40’ containers • Craneloading, noshunting • Note: Onlyintermodal operators have the freight base neededfor EMS in container transport

  6. EMS fleet • Start of trial with 2 combinations in 2004 • Currently 5 combinations • 7 roundtrips / week (140.000 km / year) • 3 million kilometers since start of trial

  7. Ourexperiences • Operational: noproblems • Drivingbehaviour of EMS (steering, braking) • Roadsafety, otherroadusers • Extension of roadnetwork to virtually all places • Financial: substantialgains • Total yearly extra cost +15-20% (€ 20.000) • Total yearlybenefits: 140.000 TEU-km (€ 70.000) • Net financial benefit: € 50.000 per unit per year • Additionalbenefits: • 60 tons CO2 (30%) reduction per unit per year • Support of co-modality: helping CTT grow

  8. Whowillgain? • Marketforceswill pass onbenefits • Trial phase: hauliers • Introductionphase: forwarders / logistic service providers • Adaptionphase: industry • End phase: consumers • Road transport industrywillnotretainbenefits • General benefitsfor society remain • Roadcongestion • CO2 reduction • Helpingfacilitategrowingdemandfor transport

  9. Backwardmodal shift? • EU transport marketwillbecomesupply-driven • No single mode canaccomodatepredictedgrowth • Co-modality is needed to furtherdevelopintermodalinitiatives • Playing field is permanentlyshifting • Costcomponents of road transport are all rising • Availability and quality of modes constantlychanges(Betuwelijn, rail tunnels, Rhine water level, newinlandterminals) • EMS is a logicalnext step • Road transport remainsindispensable • Cornerstone of EU economicdevelopment • Intermodal services are notpossibleeverywhere(volume, distance, infrastructure) • Butfear of backwardmodal shift blocksintroduction of EMS

  10. Taxationformaximization! • Net financialgain is incredibly high • 20% EMS in NL alonecanbring € 1 billiongaineachyear • On EU scalethisamountwillmultiplyby 10, 20 or more • Butthisgainwill end up withindustry and/orconsumer, not the logistics providers and hauliers • Sowhynotconsiderimposing EMS roadtax to invest in infrastructure(road / rail / waterway)? • 60 tons EMS caneasilyfinancenecessaryinvestments in bridges • … and leaveenoughleftfor all rail and waterway wishes!

  11. Conclusions • EMS: • Will notstructurallyincreasehaulier’s profits • Will support co-modality and therefore rail and water • Canfinanceconsiderableinvestments in infrastructure; road as well as rail and waterways EMS is not a threatbutanopportunityforEurope’slogisticsindustry, economy and environment

More Related