1 / 19

RADIOLOGY - CXR

RADIOLOGY - CXR. Bronchiectasis - vessel ‘crowding’ - loss of vessel markings - tramline/ring shadows - cystic lesions/ air-fluid levels - evidence of TB Poor: diagnostic sensitivity monitoring of progression 3. RADIOLOGY - HRCT. - bronchial dilatation - bronchial wall thickening

jolie
Télécharger la présentation

RADIOLOGY - CXR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RADIOLOGY - CXR Bronchiectasis - vessel ‘crowding’ - loss of vessel markings - tramline/ring shadows - cystic lesions/ air-fluid levels - evidence of TB Poor: • diagnostic sensitivity • monitoring of progression 3

  2. RADIOLOGY - HRCT - bronchial dilatation - bronchial wall thickening - classification (pathology) • sensitivity (97%) > CXR3 • chromosomal radiosensitivity - plain CXR (x 3 days background) - HRCT: x 30-40 - conventional CT: x 200 • ? routine baseline • ? (a)symptomatic monitoring

  3. UNSUSPECTED DISEASE(Clinical v CXR v HRCT) • Bronchiectasis in Hypogammaglobulinaemia - A ComputedTomography assessment.Curtin et al. Clinical Radiology (1991) 44, 82-84 • Radiologic Findings of Adult primary Immunodeficiency Disorders.Obregon et al. Chest (1994)106, 490-495 • Chest High Resolution CT in Adults with Primary Humoral Immundeficiency.Feydy et al. British Journal of Radiology (1996) 69, 1108-1116 • Clinical Utility of High-Resolution Pulmonary Computed Tomography in Children with Antibody Deficiency.Manson et al. Pediatric Radiology (1997)27, 794-798 • The Value of Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis & Managementof Bronchiectasis.Pang et al. Clinical Radiology (1989) 40, 40-44 • Review Article: Imaging in Bronchiectasis.Smith et al. British Journal of Radiology (1996) 69, 589-593 3

  4. Kainulainen et al 1999 CVID x 18, XLA x 4 CXR HRCT Bronchiectasis3 16 3 year follow-up  Disease progression (5) Serum IgG Case NoT=0 T=36 1 9.9 10.0 2 4.6 6.1 8 3.7 5.1 10 3.7 4.9 21 3.1 5.7 RADIOLOGY

  5. RADIOLOGY - HRCT RCP Specialty Specific Standards ‘Fit’ patients…….CT scanning should be undertaken in a minority of patients but usually not more than once a year or if respiratory function tests or symptoms deteriorate JCIA November 20014

  6. MANAGEMENT – GENERAL ISSUES • Shared Care (Immunologist/Respiratory Physician) optimal 4 • Bronchodilators (reversible airflow obstruction) • Mucolytics - insufficient evidence to evaluate routine use (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 3, 2003) • Physical therapy- insufficient evidence to support or refute usage (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 3, 2003) • Anti-inflammatory agents

  7. REPLACEMENT THERAPY • Risk/benefit assessment 4 • IV/Sc routes optimal 2 •  pulmonary infections in XLA/CVID (v untreated)2 • Optimal dosing/frequency/serum IgG level not established • Tailor route/dose/infusion frequency3 --------------------------------------------------------------- • Maintain IgG >5g/l2 • Paediatric target: mid reference range4 • IgG: >8g/l   infection (v 5g/l, XLA, children)3 9.4 g/l   infection (v 6.5g/l, XLA/CVID, children/adults)3 • High v standard doses   infections (no. & duration)2  days hospitalised  serum IgG • Insidious disease progression despite ‘adequate’ replacement3

  8. REPLACEMENT THERAPYHigh dose v low dose: secondary outcome, pulmonary function • Eijkhout et al 2001(randomised, double-blind, multicentre, crossover, n=43) High dose (mean trough IgG 9.4 g/l): PEFR 37.3 l/min Standard dose (mean trough IgG 6.5 g/l): PEFR 11.4 l/minNS • Roifman & Gelfand 1988 (ramdomised, crossover, n=12) High dose   FVC & FEV1p<0.01 • Roifman et al 1987(randomised, crossover, n=12) Mean FEV1 & FVC high dose phase v low dose phasep<0.01 • Bernatowska et al 1987 (two-dose, crossover, non-randomised, n=13) High dose  Max. expiratory flow & FEV1NA

  9. ACUTE INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY • Culture & sensitivity routinely in acute setting3 • Value unclear in chronic situation - confirm original pathogen - ? emerging resistance - additional pathogens ANTIBIOTICS • Effectiveness established in exacerbations (bronchiectasis)2 • Higher doses for longer periods4 • Local treatment protocols4

  10. ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS • Chronic bronchitis - no place in routine treatment (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 3, 2003) • Cystic fibrosis benefits - principally staphylococci - infancy  3/6 years - ? older children/adults - ? > 3years treatment (The Cochrane Library, Oxford. 2, 2003) (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 3, 2003) • Bronchiectasis - limited meta-analysis (6 RCTs) - marginal benefit / cautious support (Evans et al. Thorax 2001)

  11. ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS • No robust data v placebo • No substantial data v (or additional to) IVIg/SCIg(Silk et al. 1990) • ? Single intervention in mild antibody deficiency - not in more severe phenotypes / tissue damage • Papworth protocol:consider if: > 3 exacerbations / year4 radiological / PFT deterioration • ? Eradication/clean-up therapy prior to prophylaxis - no clear evidence of benefit in antibody deficiency + structural lung damage • Development of local protocols for management of infections (esp.with Primary Care) and initiating prophylaxis4

  12. (Heelan et al., ESID 2002) ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS

  13. SURGERY • Diagnostic delay > 2 years:  need for surgical procedures Adequate treatment:  lobectomy/pneumonectomy by 95% (UK PAD Audit 1993-96)3 • Important treatment option with favourable outcomes especially in focal bronchiectasis (Cohen et al 1994, Mansharamani & Koziel 2003)3

  14. QUESTIONS / ISSUES • HRCT in routine screening & monitoring • Radiological changes a primary therapeutic target - Does HRCT modify our current assumptions about criteria for adequate treatment of antibody deficiency disorders? • Correct level of Ig treatment - arbitrary target serum level (evidence) or individualised (clinical + HRCT factors) - single intervention universally applicable in all patients (probably not) - higher doses: expense, complications, limited commodity • Roles of: antibiotics anti-inflammatory agents bronchodilators aids to airway clearance • Role of co-factors (e.g. 1AT) • Selective IgA deficiency

  15. PIN GUIDELINES • Identify need for focused clinical research • Encourage debate and discussion • Reflect uncertainties in the field • Proscriptive as necessary, flexible where possible

More Related