1 / 11

Study of AEC Firms' Adoption Plans for MasterFormat™ 2004: Insights & Timeline

This study explores how top AEC firms plan to adopt MasterFormat™ 2004, aiming to standardize construction documents. The research method involved surveying ENR's Top 500 Design Firms, with 79% currently using MF on over 50% of projects. Findings reveal that 60 out of 79 firms intend to transition to MF 2004 by or during 2006, indicating a shift in the industry towards the updated standard. Potential implications include new projects aligning with MF 2004 by 2006. The study provides valuable insights into the adoption timeline and preferences of leading architecture firms regarding MasterFormat™ updates.

jordan-morrow
Télécharger la présentation

Study of AEC Firms' Adoption Plans for MasterFormat™ 2004: Insights & Timeline

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Kevin R. Miller, Ph.D. D. Mark Hutchings, Ph.D. Brigham Young University Study of Top 500 Design Firms’ Plans to Adopt MasterFormat™ 2004

  2. Introduction • 1961 initial meeting • Objective Standardize the Organization of Construction Documents • Since the creation of MasterFormat (MF) 1964, Updates occurred approx. every 7 – 8 years

  3. 2004 Update • Update process started in 2001; lasted 3 years. • 2004 version changed from 16 to 50 divisions. 1995 Version Division 1 General Requirement Division 2 Site Work Division 3 Concrete Division 4 Masonry Division 5 Metals Division 6 Carpentry Division 7 Moisture Control Division 8 Doors, Windows Division 9 Finishes Division 10 Specialties Division 11 Equipment Division 12 Furnishings Division 13 Special Construction Division 14 Conveying Systems Division 15 Mechanical Division 16 Electrical ***Similar between both versions 2004 Version Division 00 Procurement & Contracting Requirements Division 02 Existing Conditions Division 21 Fire Suppression Division 22 Plumbing Division 23 Heating, Ventilating, & Air Conditioning Division 25 Integrated Automation Division 26 Electrical Division 27 Communications Division 28 Electronic Safety and Security Division 31 Earthwork Division 32 Exterior Improvements Division 33 Utilities Divisions 34+ for Transportation & Industrial process Construction

  4. Question • With such a radical change, will designers adopt the change and what is the time table of their adopting MF 2004?

  5. Methodology • Identified ENR's Top 500 Design Firms as the basis of the survey. • ENR has published this list 40 years. • The information that ENR collects is self reported by the companies. • Survey conducted during the summer of 2005

  6. Methodology Cont • Randomly selected 200 of the 500 in the list. • Stratified the sample by Annual Revenue • (shown in Millions) • 500 + • 100 – 500 • 50 – 100 • 25 – 50 • 17 - 25 • Contacted the Spec Writers in each company. • Survey conducted by phone

  7. Methodology Cont. • Contacted 143 of the companies. • 29 chose not to participate in the study. • 114 firms participated. • Of the 114, 79 companies currently use MF on over 50% of their projects.

  8. All Firms

  9. Primarily Architecture Firms

  10. Firms by Annual Revenue

  11. Other Findings & Conclusion • 60 of the 79 firms adopting MF 2004 plan on doing so before or during 2006. • This should translate to Construction companies should start to see new projects bidding during 2006 using MF 2004

More Related